Cited by 85Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatment

Measurement of Methylphenidate-Induced Change in Extrastriatal Dopamine Concentration using [11C]FLB 457 PET

Montgomery, Andrew J, Asselin, Marie-Claude, Farde, Lars, Grasby, Paul M·2007·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

[(11)C]FLB 457 is a very high-affinity radiotracer that allows the measurement of dopamine D(2/3) receptor availability in regions of the brain where densities are very low, such as the cerebral cortex. It is not known if [(11)C]FLB 457 binding is sensitive to the concentration of endogenous dopamine in humans in a manner analogous to [(11)C]raclopride and [(123)I]IBZM in the striatum. To test this possibility, extrastriatal [(11)C]FLB 457 binding was measured at baseline and after the oral administration of 40 to 60 mg of the psychostimulant methylphenidate (MP) in 12 healthy volunteers using positron emission tomography (PET) in a balanced-order, double-blind design. The dynamic PET data were quantified using a two-tissue compartment model with a metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function. Two volunteers were excluded because of excessive head movement. In the remainder, MP caused significant reductions in the volume of distribution (VD) in temporal and frontal cortical regions and thalamus, suggesting that [(11)C]FLB 457 binding is sensitive to endogenous dopamine concentration. Moreover, the change in [(11)C]FLB 457 binding after MP correlated with the dose of MP (in mg/kg body weight) in all regions assessed. We conclude that MP in doses within the therapeutic range for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder causes increases in dopamine concentrations in extrastriatal regions and that [(11)C]FLB 457 PET may be a useful tool for the assessment…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600339

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, A. J., Asselin, M.-C., Farde, L., & Grasby, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, Andrew J
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2007-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
369-377
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2024249150
Cited by
85
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
methylphenidate, [11C]FLB 457, endogenous dopamine, psychostimulants, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cerebral cortex, thalamus, volume of distribution, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Algorithms, Carbon Radioisotopes, Cerebral Cortex, Dopamine, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Methylphenidate, Pyrrolidines, Salicylamides, Dopamine Antagonists, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review