Cited by 237Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Methylphenidate-elicited dopamine increases in ventral striatum are associated with long-term symptom improvement in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene-Jack, Tomasi, Dardo, Kollins, Scott H., Wigal, Tim L., Newcorn, Jeffrey H., Telang, Frank W., Fowler, Joanna S. +3 more·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Stimulant medications, such as methylphenidate, which are effective treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), enhance brain dopamine signaling. However, the relationship between regional brain dopamine enhancement and treatment response has not been evaluated. Here, we assessed whether the dopamine increases elicited by methylphenidate are associated with long-term clinical response. We used a prospective design to study 20 treatment-naive adults with ADHD who were evaluated before treatment initiation and after 12 months of clinical treatment with a titrated regimen of oral methylphenidate. Methylphenidate-induced dopamine changes were evaluated with positron emission tomography and [ 11 C]raclopride (D 2 /D 3 receptor radioligand sensitive to competition with endogenous dopamine). Clinical responses were assessed using the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale and revealed a significant reduction in symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity with long-term methylphenidate treatment. A challenge dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous methylphenidate significantly increased dopamine in striatum (assessed as decreases in D 2 /D 3 receptor availability). In the ventral striatum, these dopamine increases were associated with the reductions in ratings of symptoms of inattention with clinical treatment. Statistical parametric mapping additionally showed dopamine increases in prefrontal and temporal cortices with intravenous methylphenidate that were also associated with decreases in symptoms of inattention. Our findings indicate that dopamine enhancement in ventral striatum (the brain region involved with reward and motivation) was associated with therapeutic response to methylphenidate, further corroborating the relevance of the dopamine reward/motivation circuitry in ADHD. It also provides preliminary evidence that methylphenidate-elicited dopamine increases in prefrontal and temporal cortices may also contribute to the clinical response.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 20 treatment-naive adults with ADHD, methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in ventral striatum after 12 months of oral methylphenidate were associated with improvement in inattention. The study also reports preliminary evidence for cortical dopamine increases and attenuated striatal dopamine responses after long-term treatment.

Key findings

  • Acute intravenous methylphenidate (0.5 mg/kg) significantly increased striatal dopamine, measured as decreased D2/D3 receptor availability (BPND). The reductions were larger before treatment than after long-term oral methylphenidate in putamen (26 ± 7% vs 18 ± 10%, p < 0.01) and showed a trend in ventral striatum (18 ± 15% vs 9 ± 15%, p < 0.07); caudate differences were not significant (10 ± 8% vs 5 ± 10%).
  • After long-term treatment, methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in ventral striatum correlated with reduction in inattention ratings (CAARS A: r = 0.70, p < 0.001), with trends for hyperactivity (CAARS B: r = 0.50, p < 0.03) and total symptoms (CAARS G: r = 0.54, p < 0.02).
  • SPM corroborated the ventral striatum correlation with inattention and also identified correlations with dopamine increases in caudate, putamen, prefrontal (BA 8, BA 9, BA 24), and temporal (BA 22) cortices; correlations with hyperactivity or total symptoms did not reach significance in SPM.
  • Placebo-condition D2/D3 receptor availability was higher before treatment than after long-term treatment in caudate (p < 0.005) and putamen (p < 0.006), but not ventral striatum; SPM showed the same trend only at p < 0.05 uncorrected and not after familywise error correction.

Methods

  • Prospective study of 20 never-medicated adults with ADHD (12 females, 8 males) diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria, treated for 12 months with titrated oral methylphenidate (mean total daily dose near 1 mg/kg or equivalent; mean dose 75 mg).
  • PET with [11C]raclopride was performed before treatment and after 12 months, each with placebo and intravenous methylphenidate (0.5 mg/kg), to measure D2/D3 receptor availability (BPND); clinical symptoms were assessed with the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS).
  • Region-of-interest and SPM analyses assessed drug effects and correlations between methylphenidate-induced dopamine changes and symptom changes; K1 and Hamilton anxiety/depression scores were used as controls.

Limitations

  • The paper states that [11C]raclopride binding relates to extracellular dopamine but its relationship with synaptic dopamine is not completely understood; the method is best suited to striatum and much less sensitive to cortical regions, making cortical findings preliminary.
  • The paper states that ROIs were obtained from [11C]raclopride images rather than MRIs; it cannot determine whether the dampening of methylphenidate’s dopamine-enhancing effects after long-term treatment is associated with tolerance to clinical efficacy or whether it is long lasting; ethical reasons prevented an untreated ADHD control group; no cognitive performance or motivation measures were obtained; and the study focused on dopamine, not noradrenergic effects.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (n = 20), clinical treatment was open-label and titrated without a placebo-controlled clinical arm, and some reported correlations were trends or not corroborated by SPM.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4461-11.2012

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Intravenous methylphenidate significantly reduced D2/D3 receptor availability in striatal regions (caudate, putamen, ventral striatum).

    “Conversely, intravenous MP significantly reduced D2/D3 receptor availability in striatal regions (caudate, putamen, VS) (Fig. 1) (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Placebo measures showed higher D2/D3 receptor availability before treatment initiation than after long-term treatment with oral methylphenidate for caudate and putamen but not ventral striatum.

    “The ROI analysis on the measures of D2/D3 receptor availability (BPND of [ 11C]raclopride) obtained with placebo (without intravenous MP) revealed higher D2/D3 receptor availability for the measures obtained before treatment initiation (treatment-naive) than those obtained after long-term treatment with oral MP, both for caudate (p < 0.005) and putamen (p < 0.006) but not for VS (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Intravenous methylphenidate did not change K1 in striatum for neither the naive nor long-term treatment condition.

    “Intravenous MP did not change K1 (transport constant of radiotracer from plasma to tissue) in striatum for neither the naive nor long-term treatment condition (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Reductions in BPND with intravenous methylphenidate showed a trend toward being higher for treatment-naive than long-term treatment in ventral striatum (18±15 vs 9±15%, p < 0.07).

    “and showed a trend in VS (18±15vs9± 15%, p < 0.07)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The correlations between differences in K1 (placebo vs intravenous methylphenidate) and improvement in clinical symptoms during treatment were not significant for either striatal or cortical regions.

    “The correlations between the differences in K1 (placebo vs intravenous MP) and improvement in clinical symptoms during treatment (changes in scores in CAARS A, CAARS B, CAARS G) were not significant for either striatal or cortical regions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The correlation between methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in ventral striatum and improvement in inattention was significant for measures obtained after long-term treatment but not for those obtained before treatment initiation.

    “The ROI analysis revealed that the correlations between improvement in clinical symptoms with oral MP treatment (before treatment initiation vs after long-term treatment) and the DA increases elicited by intravenous MP (quantified as decreases in D2/D3 receptor availability) were significant for the measures obtained after long-term treatment but not with those obtained before treatment initiation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SPM analysis showed the same trend for higher D2/D3 receptor availability before treatment than after long-term treatment, but the effect was not significant when corrected for multiple comparisons with familywise error.

    “The SPM analysis showed the same trend (p < 0.05 uncorrected), although the effect was not significant when corrected for multiple comparisons with familywise error (pFWE-CORR > 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Clinical treatment with oral methylphenidate over 12 months significantly reduced ADHD symptoms, with all CAARS scales higher before treatment initiation than after 1 year of treatment.

    “The prospective clinical treatment with MP was associated with a significant decrease in average ratings of ADHD symptoms. All scales of the CAARS were significantly higher before treatment initiation than after 1 year of treatment with the titrated regimen or oral MP (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    None of these findings was affected when Hamilton Depression and Anxiety scores were used as covariates.

    “None of these findings was affected when we used as covariates the scores on the Hamilton's Depression and Anxiety scales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Baseline measures of D2/D3 receptor availability in putamen (naive condition) were higher than those reported in another group of naive ADHD adults (3.64 vs 3.44) but similar to the controls from that study (3.63).

    “Baseline measures of D2/D3 receptor availability in putamen (naive condition) were higher than those we reported in another group of naive ADHD adults (3.64 vs 3.44) but similar to the controls from that study (3.63) (Volkow et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Volkow et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Long-term treatment with methylphenidate decreased methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in striatum but not in cortex.

    “Long-term treatment with MP decreased MP-induced DA increases in striatum but not in cortex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Baseline measures of D2/D3 receptor availability in dorsal striatum (placebo measures) were lower after long-term treatment with oral methylphenidate than before treatment, but SPM did not corroborate this unless significance was decreased to puncorr < 0.05.

    “The ROI analysis revealed that baseline measures of D2/D3 receptor availability in dorsal striatum (placebo measures) were lower after long-term treatment with oral MP than before treatment (treatment-naive), but SPM did not corroborate this unless we decreased significance to puncorr < 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Disrupted dopamine neurotransmission has been implicated in the pathophysiology of ADHD.

    “Disrupted dopamine (DA) neurotransmission has been implicated in its pathophysiology (Volkow et al., 2007; Prince, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Volkow et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Prince, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Methylphenidate increases dopamine by blocking dopamine transporters (DATs).

    “MP increases DA by blocking dopamine transporters (DATs) and amphetamine by releasing DA from the terminal using the DAT as carrier (Kuczenski and Segal, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kuczenski and Segal, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Methylphenidate and amphetamine are the primary medications used to treat ADHD.

    “The stimulants drugs methylphenidate (MP) and amphetamine are the primary medications used to treat ADHD (Ilgenli et al., 2007; Rubia et al., 2009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ilgenli et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rubia et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All images were carefully inspected to ensure whole-brain coverage and exclude images with potential artifacts.

    “All images were carefully inspected to ensure whole-brain coverage and exclude images with potential artifacts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Because only 10% of adults in the U.S. population meeting ADHD criteria are treated at any given time, the exclusion criteria did not pose a selection bias.

    “Because it is estimated that only 10% of adults in the U.S. population meeting the criteria for ADHD are treated at any given time (Kessler et al., 2006), this exclusion criteria did not pose a selection bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kessler et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Dopamine enhancement in ventral striatum (the brain region involved with reward and motivation) was associated with therapeutic response to methylphenidate, further corroborating the relevance of the dopamine reward/motivation circuitry in ADHD.

    “Our findings indicate that dopamine enhancement in ventral striatum (the brain region involved with reward and motivation) was associated with therapeutic response to methylphenidate, further corroborating the relevance of the dopamine reward/motivation circuitry in ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Findings with the ROI analysis were considered significant only if corroborated with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).

    “Findings with the ROI analysis were considered significant only if corroborated with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) (Friston et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Friston et al., 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To control for the contribution of depression and anxiety on methylphenidate-induced dopamine changes, Hamilton scores were included as covariates in the analyses.

    “To control for the contribution of depression and anxiety on MP-induced DA changes, we included the Hamilton scores as covariates in the analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Evidence was required from each subject's history that some symptoms of ADHD were present in childhood (before age 7 years).

    “In addition, evidence was required from each subject's history that some symptoms of ADHD were present in childhood (before age 7 years) even when the diagnosis was not made until adulthood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The PET scans for the long-term treatment condition were conducted 24-48 h after the last clinical dose of methylphenidate to allow levels to dissipate, and plasma methylphenidate levels were measured to ensure they were nondetectable.

    “The PET scans for the long-term treatment condition were conducted 24–48 h after the last clinical dose of MP to allow for the levels of MP from the final dose to dissipate before the PET study (Modi et al., 2000). To corroborate this, we measured plasma MP levels before intravenous injection of MP to ensure that they were nondetectable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Modi et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Urine drug screens were obtained on all subjects the day of the PET scan to check for psychoactive drug use.

    “Urine drug screens were obtained on all subjects the day of the PET scan to check for psychoactive drug use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Correlations were restricted to three subscales to limit the number of analyses.

    “We restricted correlations to three subscales to limit the number of analyses”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants underwent urine drug toxicological tests to ensure absence of drug use both at screening and before the PET scan evaluations.

    “To ascertain past history of substance abuse, participants were asked about present or past substance abuse and underwent urine drug toxicological tests to ensure absence of drug use both at the time of screening and before the PET scan evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    At least two clinicians interviewed the patients to ensure that they met DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD.

    “At least two clinicians interviewed the patients to ensure that they met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for ADHD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [11C]raclopride is a dopamine D2/D3 receptor radioligand whose specific binding is sensitive to competition by endogenous dopamine.

    “The DA increases to the acute MP challenge were assessed using positron emission tomography (PET) with [ 11C]raclopride (DA D2/D3 receptor radioligand whose specific binding is sensitive to competition by endogenous DA) (Dewey et al., 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dewey et al., 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increasing evidence suggests that a reward and motivation deficit may be of equal importance to an attention deficit in ADHD.

    “Historically, the core feature of ADHD has been characterized as one of an attention deficit, but increasing evidence suggests that a reward and motivation deficit may be of equal importance (Haenlein and Caul, 1987; Sonuga-Barke, 2003; Tripp and Wickens, 2008; Castellanos, 2009; Volkow et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haenlein and Caul, 1987 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sonuga-Barke, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tripp and Wickens, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study used a single blind design in which subjects were blind to the drugs received.

    “The study used a single blind design (subjects were blind to the drugs received).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prefrontal regions express low dopamine transporter levels.

    “Although prefrontal regions expresses low DAT levels (Sesack et al., 1998), MP also blocks norepinephrine transporters (Hannestad et al., 2010), which in prefrontal cortex contribute to DA reuptake and mediate DA increases (Carboni et al., 1990; Morón et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sesack et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A key component of the dopamine-deficit theory of ADHD proposes that methylphenidate treatment enhances dopamine in the prefrontal cortex and this contributes to its therapeutic effects.

    “A key component of the DA-deficit theory of ADHD proposes that MP treatment enhances DA in the prefrontal cortex and this contributes to its therapeutic effects (Arnsten, 2009), and fMRI studies support this (Bush et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Arnsten, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bush et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The attenuation in striatum but not cortical regions suggests changes in dopamine autoreceptor sensitivity and/or dopamine transporter upregulation.

    “Because the attenuation was in striatum and not in cortical regions, this suggests that they reflect changes in DA autoreceptor sensitivity and/or DAT upregulation because cortical DA projections are much less sensitive to regulation by DA autoreceptors or DAT (Lammel et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lammel et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The reductions in D2/D3 receptor availability in prefrontal and temporal cortices are reliable effects, based on consistency across both assessments and high statistical significance.

    “Although the accuracy of [11C]raclopride to measure DA changes in cortical regions is limited (Egerton et al., 2009), the consistency across both assessments and the high level of statistical significance suggest that these are reliable effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Oral methylphenidate (0.63 mg/kg) increased dopamine in prefrontal and temporal cortices in controls.

    “Moreover, a previous study showed that oral MP (0.63 mg/kg) increased DA in prefrontal and temporal cortices in controls using [ 11C]FLB 457 [(S)-5-bromo-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2,3-dimethoxybenzamide monohydrobromide] (Montgomery et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Methylphenidate blocks norepinephrine transporters.

    “Although prefrontal regions expresses low DAT levels (Sesack et al., 1998), MP also blocks norepinephrine transporters (Hannestad et al., 2010), which in prefrontal cortex contribute to DA reuptake and mediate DA increases (Carboni et al., 1990; Morón et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hannestad et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In adolescents with ADHD, decreased dopamine synthesis in the nucleus accumbens is correlated with symptoms of inattention.

    “In ADHD, the decreased DA synthesis of adolescents in nucleus accumbens (located in VS) was also correlated with symptoms of inattention (Forssberg et al., 2006), suggesting that our findings may also pertain to adolescents with ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Forssberg et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is evidence of the involvement of temporal cortical regions in ADHD and of their sensitivity to methylphenidate.

    “Although much less investigated, there is also evidence of the involvement of temporal cortical regions in ADHD (Kobel et al., 2010) and on their sensitivity to MP (Rubia et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kobel et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rubia et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The reductions in dopamine increases are likely to reflect neuroplasticity effects of chronic methylphenidate treatment rather than natural decline.

    “These reductions are likely to reflect neuroplasticity effects of chronic MP treatment rather than natural decline because, in healthy controls, DA increases induced by amphetamine were higher (not lower) when subjects were retested 12 months later without any therapeutic intervention (Boileau et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boileau et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Methylphenidate could ameliorate inattention by both enhancing saliency (through effects on the ventral striatum) and enhancing the executive components of attention that are mediated through prefrontal regions.

    “MP could ameliorate inattention by both enhancing saliency (through effects on VS) and enhancing the executive components of attention that are mediated through prefrontal regions (including cingulate gyrus) (Fan et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fan et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Methylphenidate, by increasing dopamine in the ventral striatum, enhances the saliency of the task, thus improving attention in ADHD.

    “we had proposed that MP, by increasing DA in VS (central brain region for motivation and reward; Wise, 2002) would enhance the saliency of the task, thus improving attention in ADHD (Volkow et al., 2001, 2004), and our current finding of a correlation between MP-induced DA increases in VS and reductions in inattention support this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wise, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Volkow et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Volkow et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dopamine increases in prefrontal and temporal cortices have been reported with drug challenges (tetrahydrocannabinol and methamphetamine) using [11C]raclopride.

    “Indeed, others have reported DA increases in prefrontal and temporal cortices with drug challenges (tetrahydrocannabinol and methamphetamine) using [ 11C]raclopride (Piccini et al., 2003; Stokes et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Piccini et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stokes et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In adults with ADHD, dopamine markers in the ventral striatum are associated with symptoms of inattention and reduced trait motivation.

    “They are also consistent with previous findings of an association between DA markers in the VS and symptoms of inattention and with reduced scores in a trait measure of motivation in adults with ADHD (Volkow et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Volkow et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In prefrontal cortex, norepinephrine transporters contribute to dopamine reuptake and mediate dopamine increases.

    “Although prefrontal regions expresses low DAT levels (Sesack et al., 1998), MP also blocks norepinephrine transporters (Hannestad et al., 2010), which in prefrontal cortex contribute to DA reuptake and mediate DA increases (Carboni et al., 1990; Morón et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carboni et al., 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morón et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study cannot determine whether the dampening of dopamine-enhancing effects of methylphenidate after long-term treatment is associated with tolerance to clinical efficacy, whether it is long lasting or dissipates promptly.

    “We show dampening of the DA-enhancing effects of MP after long-term treatment, but we cannot determine whether this is associated with tolerance to clinical efficacy, whether it is long lasting or dissipates promptly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not obtain measures of motivation, which would have allowed testing whether dopamine increases in the ventral striatum were associated with increased motivation while on clinical treatment.

    “In our study, we did not obtain measures of motivation, which would have allowed us to test whether DA increases in VS were associated with increased motivation while on clinical treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The [11C]raclopride method is best suited for regions with high D2/D3 receptor density, such as striatum, and much less sensitive to cortical regions, which renders the cortical findings preliminary.

    “The [ 11C]raclopride method is best suited for regions with high D2/D3 receptor density, such as striatum, and much less sensitive to cortical regions, which renders our cortical findings as preliminary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Using ROIs obtained directly from [11C]raclopride images rather than MRIs is unlikely to have influenced the findings, because measures of D2/D3 receptor availability obtained using ROIs selected directly from [11C]raclopride images do not differ from those selected from the subject's MRIs.

    “ROIs were obtained directly from the [ 11C]raclopride images and not from MRIs but, because measures of D2/D3 receptor availability obtained using ROIs selected directly from [ 11C]raclopride images do not differ from those selected from the subject's MRIs (Wang et al., 1996), this is unlikely to have influenced our findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These differences are likely to reflect intersubject variability as well as noncontrolled variables that influence D2/D3 receptor availability.

    “These differences are likely to reflect intersubject variability as well as noncontrolled variables that influence D2/D3 receptor availability (i.e., sleep deprivation) (Volkow et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Volkow et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because of ethical reasons, the study did not use a group of untreated ADHD controls to rule out the possibility that the attenuation reflects an age-related decline.

    “Because of ethical reasons, we did not use a group of untreated ADHD controls to rule out the possibility that the attenuation reflects an age-related decline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Changes in [11C]raclopride binding are related to extracellular dopamine, but the relationship with synaptic dopamine is not completely understood.

    “Changes in [ 11C]raclopride binding are related to extracellular DA, but the relationship with synaptic DA is not completely understood (Gjedde et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gjedde et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

45 of 45
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationship between dopamine increases elicited by stimulant medications and the response to clinical treatment in ADHD individuals is not known.

    “However, the relationship between DA increases elicited by stimulant medications and the response to clinical treatment in ADHD individuals is not known.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relationship between regional brain dopamine enhancement and treatment response has not been evaluated.

    “However, the relationship between regional brain dopamine enhancement and treatment response has not been evaluated.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term stimulant medication was associated with abnormally elevated striatal DAT levels.

    “Our meta-regression analysis of positron emission tomography studies, on the other hand, showed that long-term stimulant medication was associated with abnormally elevated striatal DAT levels (14), which was also found in a prospective 1-year positron emission tomography study 86, 87, suggesting brain adaptation and tolerance to long-term stimulants.”

    From Effects of stimulants on brain function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) says that a previously reported 12-month methylphenidate study found striatal DAT upregulation. This paper's own prospective study measured dopamine responses and D2/D3 receptor availability, not DAT levels; it also does not establish that DAT levels were abnormally elevated. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Significant correlations exist between global clinical improvement in ADHD symptoms following methylphenidate treatment and striatal dopamine transporter availability.

    “Furthermore, studies have shown significant correlations between global clinical improvement in ADHD symptoms following MPH treatment and striatal DAT availability (213, 214), and the MPH-induced increases in DA availability in the ventral striatum are associated with improved ADHD symptomology in adults with ADHD (215).”
  • Methylphenidate-elicited dopamine increases were associated with therapeutic response in individuals with ADHD.

    “corroborating Volkow et al.'s (2012) conclusion that methylphenidate-elicited dopamine increases were associated with therapeutic response in individuals with ADHD [46].”
  • A number of studies have shown that ADHD is associated with a motivational deficit due to a dopamine dysfunction in the basal ganglia.

    “A number of studies have shown that ADHD is associated with a motivational deficit due to a dopamine dysfunction in the basal ganglia [71–73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Symptom-total subscale is identified as both CAARS G and CAARS H

    Minor

    The clinical-scales section identifies CAARS G as the DSM-IV symptom total and CAARS H as the ADHD index, but later says symptom improvement was quantified using CAARS H for the symptom total. The subsequent statistical analysis also specifies CAARS G for total symptoms.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Tomasi, D., Kollins, S. H., Wigal, T. L., Newcorn, J. H., Telang, F. W., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Wong, C. T., & Swanson, J. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
841-849
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2072626594
Cited by
237
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ACO2‐76CH00016, 76CH00016)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066961, R01MH66961)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24DA023464)
  • Biological and Environmental Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, dopamine, ventral striatum, treatment response, inattention, hyperactivity, prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, adult ADHD, stimulant medication
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Protein Binding, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Receptors, Dopamine, Statistics as Topic, Antipsychotic Agents, Raclopride, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review