Cited by 26Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Validation of the Stabil-O-Graph blood pressure self-measurement device

Westhoff, T H, Schmidt, S, Zidek, W, van der Giet, M·2008·Journal of Human Hypertension

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002287

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westhoff, T. H., Schmidt, S., Zidek, W., & van der Giet, M.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Venue
Journal of Human Hypertension
Published
2007-09-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
233-235
ISSN
  • 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5527
OpenAlex
W2035214693
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
blood pressure self-measurement, home blood pressure monitoring, device validation, hypertension diagnosis, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Pressure Monitors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review