Cited by 84Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Efficacy of a text messaging (SMS) based intervention for adults with hypertension: protocol for the StAR (SMS Text-message Adherence suppoRt trial) randomised controlled trial

Open access
Bobrow, Kirsty, Brennan, Thomas, Springer, David, Levitt, Naomi S, Rayner, Brian, Namane, Mosedi, Yu, Ly-Mee, Tarassenko, Lionel +1 more·2014·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interventions to support people with hypertension in attending clinics and taking their medication have potential to improve outcomes, but delivery on a wide scale and at low cost is challenging. Some trials evaluating clinical interventions using short message service (SMS) text-messaging systems have shown important outcomes, although evidence is limited. We have developed a novel SMS system integrated with clinical care for use by people with hypertension in a low-resource setting. We aim to test the efficacy of the system in improving blood pressure control and treatment adherence compared to usual care. METHODS/DESIGN: The SMS Text-message Adherence suppoRt trial (StAR) is a pragmatic individually randomised three-arm parallel group trial in adults treated for hypertension at a single primary care centre in Cape Town, South Africa. The intervention is a structured programme of clinic appointment, medication pick-up reminders, medication adherence support and hypertension-related education delivered remotely using an automated system with either informational or interactive SMS text-messages. Usual care is supplemented by infrequent non-hypertension related SMS text-messages. Participants are 1:1:1 individually randomised, to usual care or to one of the two active interventions using minimisation to dynamically adjust for gender, age, baseline systolic blood pressure, years with hypertension, and previous clinic attendance. The primary outcome is the change in mean systolic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up from baseline measured with research staff blinded to trial allocation. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with 80% or more of days medication available, proportion of participants achieving a systolic blood pressure less than 140 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, hospital admissions, health status, retention in clinical care, satisfaction with treatment and care, and patient related quality of life. Anonymised demographic data are collected on non-participants. DISCUSSION: The StAR trial uses a novel, low cost system based on widely available mobile phone technology to deliver the SMS-based intervention, manage communication with patients, and measure clinically relevant outcomes. The results will inform implementation and wider use of mobile phone based interventions for health care delivery in a low-resource setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02019823.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-14-28

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobrow, K., Brennan, T., Springer, D., Levitt, N. S., Rayner, B., Namane, M., Yu, L.-M., Tarassenko, L., & Farmer, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Bobrow, Kirsty
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2014-01-11
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
28-28
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976523718
Cited by
83
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10077)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
hypertension, text messaging, text messaging intervention, medication adherence, blood pressure control, appointment reminders, mobile health, resource-limited settings, primary care, automated messaging, patient retention, health education
MeSH terms
Adult, Appointments and Schedules, Blood Pressure, Health Status, Humans, Hypertension, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Research Design, South Africa, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review