Cited by 21Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsmelanin and skin pigmentationNuclear Structure and Function

Requirement of Dynactin p150Glued Subunit for the Functional Integrity of the Keratinocyte Microparasol

Open access
Randolph Byers, H., Dykstra, Sarah G., Boissel, Sandrine J.S.·2007·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

The keratinocyte microparasol, composed of a perinuclear microtubular/melano-phagolysosomal complex, protects the nucleus from UV-induced DNA damage. We have previously demonstrated that cytoplasmic dynein is the motor involved in the perinuclear-directed aggregation of phagocytosed melanosomes. Dynactin, of which p150(Glued) is the major subunit, can link directly to microtubules and links organelles to dynein at different domains. To further define the mechanism of the microparasol, we transfected siRNA targeted against p150(Glued) into human keratinocytes cultured with 0.5 mm fluorescent microspheres and performed time-lapse analysis, confocal immunolocalization, and Western immunoblotting after 24 and 48 hours. Western blots revealed a significant knockdown of the p150(Glued) subunit. The knockdown decreased p150(Glued) colocalization with microtubules and decreased perinuclear positioning of the convergent microtubular framework. It also inhibited perinuclear aggregation of phagocytosed fluorescent microspheres and reduced mean centripetal microsphere displacement. The findings provide evidence that dynactin p150(Glued) plays an important role in the functional integrity of the keratinocyte microparasol.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jid.5700760

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randolph Byers, H., Dykstra, S. G., & Boissel, S. J. S.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
127
Issue
7
Pages
1736-1744
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034154683
Cited by
21
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ca045587-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-45587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
dynactin, p150Glued, cytoplasmic dynein, microtubules, melanosomes, phagocytosis, UV-induced DNA damage, nuclear protection, siRNA knockdown
MeSH terms
Dynactin Complex, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, DNA Damage, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Lysosomes, Male, Microspheres, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Keratinocytes, Melanosomes, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review