The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MRI-Guided Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions
Open accessAbstract
We present the clinical implementation of a novel hybrid system that combines magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and near-infrared (NIR) optical measurements for the noninvasive study of breast cancer in vivo. Fourteen patients were studied with a MR-NIR prototype imager and spectrometer. A diffuse optical tomographic scheme employed the MR images as a priori information to implement an image-guided NIR localized spectroscopic scheme. All patients who entered the study also underwent gadolinium-enhanced MRI and biopsy so that the optical findings were cross-validated with MR readings and histopathology. The technique quantified the oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin of five malignant and nine benign breast lesions in vivo. Breast cancers were found with decreased oxygen saturation and higher blood concentration than most benign lesions. The average hemoglobin concentration ([H]) of cancers was 0.130+/-0.100 mM, and the average hemoglobin saturation (Y) was 60+/-9% compared to [H]=0.018+/-0.005 mM and Y=69+/-6% of background tissue. Fibroadenomas exhibited high hemoglobin concentration [H]=0.060+/-0.010 mM and mild decrease in oxygen saturation Y=67+/-2%. Cysts and other normal lesions were easily differentiated based on intrinsic contrast information. This novel optical technology can be a significant add-on in MR examinations and can be used to characterize functional parameters of cancers with diagnostic and treatment prognosis potential. It is foreseen that the technique can play a major role in functional activation studies of brain and muscle as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A clearer vision for in vivo imaging
Weissleder, R. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/86684 · Cited by 3,839
Tumor Hypoxia: Definitions and Current Clinical, Biologic, and Molecular Aspects
Hockel, M., & Vaupel, P. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.4.266 · Cited by 2,662
Cited by
Shedding light onto live molecular targets
Weissleder, R., & Ntziachristos, V. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0103-123 · Cited by 1,909
Self-citationDiffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography
Durduran, T., Choe, R., Baker, W. B., & Yodh, A. G. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076701 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationRecent advances in diffuse optical imaging
Gibson, A. P., Hebden, J. C., & Arridge, S. R. (2005) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/r01 · Cited by 1,114
FLUORESCENCE MOLECULAR IMAGING
Ntziachristos, V. (2006) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095831 · Cited by 731
Self-citationBoas, D. A., Dale, A. M., & Franceschini, M. A. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.011 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Ntziachristos, V., Yodh, A. G., Schnall, M. D., & Chance, B.
- Venue
- Neoplasia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 347-354
- ISSN
- 1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089499666
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI-Guided Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.neo.7900244
- The paper
- Ntziachristos, V., Yodh, A. G., Schnall, M. D., & Chance, B. (2002). MRI-Guided Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Neoplasia. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.