Cited by 66Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Psychostimulants induce low-frequency oscillations in the firing activity of dopamine neurons

Shi, Wei-Xing, Pun, Chen-Lun, Zhou, Yan·2004·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The reinforcing properties of psychostimulants depend critically on their effects on dopamine (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Using in vivo single unit recording in rats and spectral analysis, this study presents evidence for a new, non-DA-mediated effect of psychostimulants on VTA DA neurons. Thus, as previously observed with D-amphetamine, all psychostimulants tested, including cocaine, methamphetamine, and methylphenidate, had two opposing effects on firing rate of DA neurons: a DA-mediated inhibition and a non-DA-mediated excitation. The latter effect was normally masked by the DA-mediated inhibition and was revealed when the inhibition was blocked by a DA antagonist. Using spectral analysis, this study further showed that during psychostimulant-induced excitation, DA cells exhibited not only an increase in firing rate and bursting but also a low-frequency rhythmic oscillation (0.5-1.5 Hz) in their firing activity. The oscillatory response was unique to psychostimulants since it was not observed with the GABA(A) agonist muscimol, which also increased DA cell firing, and not mimicked by the nonpsychostimulant DA agonist L-dopa. Results further suggest that the effect requires activation of adrenergic alpha1 receptors and depends on intact forebrain inputs to DA neurons. Further understanding of this novel effect may provide important insights into both the mechanism of action of psychostimulants and the neuronal circuitry that controls the activity of DA neurons in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300534

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, W.-X., Pun, C.-L., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Wei-Xing
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2004-07-14
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2160-2167
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2313888853
Cited by
66
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Scholars Repository - LLU (Loma Linda University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
psychostimulants, dopaminergic neurons, ventral tegmental area, low-frequency oscillations, neuronal firing rate, cocaine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, burst firing, muscimol, L-DOPA
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Dopamine, Drug Interactions, Functional Laterality, Male, Muscimol, Neurons, Periodicity, Spectrum Analysis, Dopamine Agents, Prosencephalon, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Ventral Tegmental Area, GABA Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review