Cited by 97Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex

Gilbert, Donald L, Ridel, Keith R, Sallee, Floyd R, Zhang, Jie, Lipps, Tara D, Wassermann, Eric M·2006·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Stimulant and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor medications have different effects at the neuronal level, but both reduce symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To understand their common physiologic effects and thereby gain insight into the neurobiology of ADHD treatment, we compared the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and NE uptake inhibitor atomoxetine (ATX) on inhibitory and excitatory processes in human cortex. Nine healthy, right-handed adults were given a single, oral dose of 30 mg MPH and 60 mg ATX at visits separated by 1 week in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. We used paired and single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex to measure conditioned and unconditioned motor-evoked potential amplitudes at inhibitory (3 ms) and facilitatory (10 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISI) before and after drug administration. Data were analyzed with repeated measures, mixed model regression. We also analyzed our findings and the published literature with meta-analysis software to estimate treatment effects of stimulants and NE reuptake inhibitors on these TMS measures. There were no significant pretreatment differences or effects of treatment order. Both agents produced a significant increase in facilitation and a decrease in inhibition. Effects of ATX and MPH did not differ significantly. Pooled estimates from published studies show similar results for stimulants and NE reuptake inhibitors. In conclusion, in hea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300806

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, D. L., Ridel, K. R., Sallee, F. R., Zhang, J., Lipps, T. D., & Wassermann, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Donald L
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2005-07-20
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
442-449
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2019205381
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS041920, K23 NS41920)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, stimulant medication, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, motor cortex, cortical inhibition, cortical facilitation, motor evoked potentials, interstimulus interval, transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Motor Cortex, Neural Inhibition, Propylamines, Time Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Cross-Over Studies, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review