Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, there has been growing enthusiasm that functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could achieve clinical utility for a broad range of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, several barriers remain. For example, the acquisition of large-scale datasets capable of clarifying the marked heterogeneity that exists in psychiatric illnesses will need to be realized. In addition, there continues to be a need for the development of image processing and analysis methods capable of separating signal from artifact. As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, and movement-related artifact being a significant confound in functional imaging studies, ADHD offers a unique challenge. As part of the ADHD-200 Global Competition and this special edition of Frontiers, the ADHD-200 Consortium demonstrates the utility of an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions in addressing these challenges. The work aimed to (1) examine the impact of emerging techniques for controlling for "micro-movements," and (2) provide novel insights into the neural correlates of ADHD subtypes. Using support vector machine (SVM)-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) we show that functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes. The application of graph-theory revealed that the Combined (ADHD-C) and Inattentive (ADHD-I) subtypes demonstrated some overlapping (particularly sensorimotor systems), but unique patterns of atypical connectivity. For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum. Systematic motion-related artifact was noted, and highlighted the need for stringent motion correction. Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed. These data suggest that resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD and to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using the aggregated ADHD-200 resting-state fMRI dataset, this paper shows that stringent micro-movement correction is necessary and that functional connectivity patterns can differentiate ADHD Combined and Inattentive subtypes from each other and from typically developing controls. The two subtypes show overlapping sensorimotor atypicality but distinct connectivity signatures, with ADHD-C involving default-network/insular regions and ADHD-I involving dorsolateral prefrontal and cerebellar regions.
Key findings
- In 455 typically developing children and 193 children with ADHD, SVM-based MVPA classified ADHD subtypes from controls above chance after conservative motion correction: Procedure 5 gave 77.0% accuracy for ADHD-C vs. TDC (75% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity) and 80.8% for ADHD-I vs. TDC (78.9% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity); Procedure 10 gave 71.2% for ADHD-C vs. TDC and 82.7% for ADHD-I vs. TDC.
- Three-group classification (chance = 33%) reached 69.2% overall with Procedure 5, 56.4% with Procedure 8, and 68.6% with Procedure 10.
- Traditional motion parameters showed a non-linear relationship with whole-brain BOLD change (DVARS), and frame-to-frame measures such as FD also remained non-linear; several correction procedures reduced the short- vs. long-range connectivity distinction, while age prediction remained possible (e.g., R² = 0.36 for Procedure 1, R² = 0.46 for Procedure 9).
- Graph-theory node-strength analyses showed ADHD-C atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components and insular cortex, whereas ADHD-I showed atypical patterns in dorsolateral prefrontal regions and cerebellum; both subtypes showed sensorimotor system involvement.
Methods
- Design: retrospective aggregation of ADHD-200 rs-fcMRI data from multiple institutions; participants were youth ages 7–14 years, comprising 455 typically developing controls and 193 subjects with DSM-IV-TR ADHD (ADHD-I N = 80; ADHD-C N = 112 in Table 1).
- Imaging/analysis: 160 a priori ROIs, single-subject 160 × 160 correlation matrices, Fisher r-to-z transformation, FDR correction, SVM/SVR-based MVPA with leave-one-out cross-validation, and graph-theory node-strength visualization.
- Motion handling: ten motion correction procedures were compared, including traditional regression, frame-to-frame covariates, mean FD covariate/matching, frame censoring (FD > 0.2 mm or DVARS > 4), and polynomial r-value correction; diagnostic comparisons used Procedures 5, 8, and 10 and controlled for site, gender, and IQ via multiple regression.
Limitations
- The paper states that movement correction still has room for improvement; data were aggregated across sites without coordinated recruitment, diagnostic, or imaging protocols, so marked site-related variation exists.
- The paper notes that ADHD diagnosis relies on strict symptom counts and DSM-IV, and that ADHD-I includes participants subthreshold for hyperactivity; it also cannot rule out that differences reflect the effort required to remain still in ADHD.
- Evident from the text: frame-removal procedures reduce sample size/power, interpolation added more noise than simple removal, classification algorithms were not optimized, and the hyperactive-impulsive subtype was omitted due to its relative rarity in the age range studied.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed.
“Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For ADHD-I, atypical patterns were exhibited within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.
“For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes (ADHD-C and ADHD-I).
“Using support vector machine (SVM)-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) we show that functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.
- Findingown data
For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex.
“For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Systematic motion-related artifact was present in the data.
“Systematic motion-related artifact was noted, and highlighted the need for stringent motion correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
With Procedure 9, the ability to make age predictions was the highest of all methods thus far (R2 = 0.46).
“the ability to make age predictions was the highest of all of the methods thus far (R2 = 0.46) (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Censoring the frames as in Procedure 7 after applying Procedure 10 reveals no effect of movement.
“Censoring the frames as in Procedure 7 after applying this procedure reveals no effect of movement (Figure A8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Despite volume censoring with FDi > 0.2 mm, age and mean FD remain associated (p = 0.0001).
“Importantly, despite the removal of motion related frames exceeding a threshold of 0.2 mm displacement, age, and mean FD continued to be associated, p = 0.0001 (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in mean distance of long-range connections using mean FD as a covariate (Procedure 5) relative to traditional correction (Procedure 1) is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
“The difference in mean distance of long-range connections using this method relative to Procedure 1 was also highly significant (p < 0.0001) (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
- Findingown data
Using Procedure 8, predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 78.8% accuracy (75.0% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity).
“while our predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 78.8 % accuracy (75.0% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Volume censoring with DVARSi > 4 and subject matching using mean DVARS (Procedure 9) significantly reduces the short- and long-range distinctions in their relationships with age.
“Interestingly, while the short- and long-range distinctions in terms of their relationship with age were also significantly reduced as with other methods”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is a non-linear relationship between all six traditional motion parameters and changes in the whole brain BOLD signal (DVARS).
“Figure 1A clearly illustrates that there is a non-linear relationship between all six traditional motion parameters and changes in the BOLD signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Including mean FDi across all frames as a group-level covariate in the correlation between functional connectivity and age substantially attenuates the distinction between long- and short-range connections in their relationships with age.
“As previously shown, this method substantially attenuates the distinction between long- and short-range connections in terms of their relationships with age (Van Dijk et al., 2012) (see Figures 2 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Dijk et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
- Findingown data
Re-running Procedure 7 including only subjects with <60% of frames removed yields largely convergent results.
“We therefore re-ran our analysis for Procedure 7 while including only those subjects with <60% of their frames removed. Results were largely convergent (see Figure A6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Imputing missing frames using cubic spline interpolation adds significantly more noise than simply removing volumes of high movement.
“As can be seen in Figure 6, imputing missing frames using cubic spline interpolation added significantly more noise than simply removing the volumes of high movement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
With volume censoring (Procedure 7), the ability to make age predictions based on SVR-based MVPA was similar to Procedures 5 and 6 (R2 = 0.42).
“The ability to make age predictions based on SVR-based MVPA was similar to Procedures 5 and 6 (R2 = 0.42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in mean distance of short-range connections using subject matching (Procedure 6) relative to traditional correction (Procedure 1) is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
“The difference in mean distance of short-range connections using this method relative to no “micro-movement” motion correction (i.e., Procedure 1) was also highly significant (p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 5, SVM-based MVPA predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 77.0% accuracy (75% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity).
“Using procedure 5, our predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 77.0% accuracy (75% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subject matching based on mean FDi (Procedure 6) also attenuates the distinction between short- and long-range connections in their relationships with age.
“This analysis also attenuated the distinction between short- and long-range connections in terms of their relationships with age (Figures 2 and 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The node strength findings were qualitatively similar across the motion correction methods.
“The findings were qualitatively similar across the motion correction methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in mean distance of long-range connections using subject matching (Procedure 6) relative to traditional correction (Procedure 1) is significant (p < 0.0001).
“The difference in mean distance of long-range connections using this method relative to no “micro-movement” motion correction was significant, as well (p < 0.0001) (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in mean distance of short-range connections using mean FD as a covariate (Procedure 5) relative to traditional correction (Procedure 1) is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
“The difference in the mean distance of short-range connections using this method relative to those obtained using Procedure 1 (i.e., traditional correction) was highly significant (p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
- Findingown data
Using Procedure 5, predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 80.8% accuracy (78.9% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity).
“while our predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 80.8% accuracy (78.9% sensitivity and 82.7% specificity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 8, predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 63.4% accuracy (61.5% sensitivity, 65.4% specificity).
“Using procedure 8, our predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 63.4% accuracy (61.5% sensitivity, 65.4% specificity)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ADHD-I group, differences were most prominent in specific regions of the fronto-parietal and cerebellar systems, specifically dorsolateral prefrontal regions.
“However, most notable in the ADHD-I group was the prominence of differences in specific regions of the fronto-parietal and cerebellar systems—specifically dorsolateral prefrontal regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The three techniques (Procedures 5, 8, and 10) reveal similar, albeit not identical, findings.
“Nonetheless, the three techniques reveal similar, albeit not identical findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Procedure 10 (r-value correction using polynomial regression based on volume censoring) was quite productive at motion correction.
“This procedure utilized censoring techniques to generate a polynomial capable of correcting the original r-values, and was quite productive at motion correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 10, a 3-group classifier achieved overall 68.6% accuracy (TDC = 71.2%, ADHD-C = 63.5%, ADHD-I = 71.2%).
“For procedure 10 the findings again revealed largely consistent strong findings (overall 68.6%; TDC = 71.2%, ADHD-C = 63.5%, ADHD-I = 71.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sensorimotor regions were also atypical in ADHD-I, similar to ADHD-C.
“In addition, similar to ADHD-C, sensorimotor regions (light blue) (Figure 8) were also atypical in ADHD-I.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using rs-fcMRI, the study found that distinctions are present in the neural substrates of ADHD-C and ADHD-I.
“Using rs-fcMRI, we found that while commonalities exist in the neural substrates of the two subtypes, distinctions are also present—suggesting that ADHD-I may capture not simply a “less severe” form of ADHD-C, but a neurobiologically distinct syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 10, predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 71.2% accuracy (73.1% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity).
“Last, using procedure 10, our predictions for ADHD-C relative to controls showed 71.2% accuracy (73.1% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 5, a 3-group classifier (TDC, ADHD-C, ADHD-I) achieved overall 69.2% accuracy (TDC = 67.3%, ADHD-C = 71.1%, ADHD-I = 69.2%).
“For procedure 5, the 3-group classifier revealed results that were highly significant (overall 69.2% accuracy; TDC = 67.3%, ADHD-C = 71.1%, ADHD-I = 69.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 8, a 3-group classifier achieved overall 56.4% accuracy (TDC = 59.6%, ADHD-C = 44.2%, ADHD-I = 65.4%).
“For procedure 8, the results were also promising albeit reduced (overall 56.4%; TDC = 59.6%; ADHD-C = 44.2%; ADHD-I = 65.4%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Direct comparison between ADHD-I and ADHD-C was largely consistent with the distinctions noted above.
“The direct comparison between ADHD-I and ADHD-C were largely consistent with the distinctions noted above (Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ADHD-associated differences in connectivity of primary sensorimotor systems were observed across both subtypes.
“Along with the other systems noted above, ADHD-associated differences in connectivity of primary sensorimotor systems was observed across both subtypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ADHD-I, atypical nodes in left and right dorsolateral prefrontal regions and the cerebellum were more strongly predictive.
“In the case of ADHD-I, atypical nodes in left and right dorsolateral prefrontal regions along with the cerebellum were more strongly predictive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using Procedure 10, predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 82.7% accuracy (78.9% sensitivity, 86.5% specificity).
“while our predictions for ADHD-I relative to controls showed 82.7% accuracy (78.9% sensitivity, 86.5% specificity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Procedure 10, node strength patterns that most strongly separate each ADHD subtype from TDC reveal stark differences between ADHD-C and ADHD-I.
“For procedure 10, visualization of those nodes whose strength most strongly separated each of the two ADHD subtypes considered from TDC (i.e., Node Strength), revealed stark differences between the two (Figure 8; Figures A4, A5; Table A1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using rs-fcMRI, the study found that commonalities exist in the neural substrates of ADHD-C and ADHD-I.
“Using rs-fcMRI, we found that while commonalities exist in the neural substrates of the two subtypes, distinctions are also present—suggesting that ADHD-I may capture not simply a “less severe” form of ADHD-C, but a neurobiologically distinct syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study was able to make significant disease status predictions well above chance.
“While this particular effort did not focus on maximizing our supervised learning algorithm and feature selection, we were able to make significant disease status predictions well above chance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD.
“These data suggest that resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD and to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Findings related to short and long-range functional connectivity can be augmented by micro-movements.
“We focus this analysis on results related to short and long-range functional connectivity, as recent works suggest that findings related to these types of connections can be augmented by micro-movements (Power et al., 2012a; Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Power et al., 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Dijk et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.
“These data suggest that resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD and to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
ADHD is associated with increased prevalence of motion in fMRI-based research.
“As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, ADHD presents exceptional challenges for fMRI-based research, due to importance of addressing the increased prevalence of motion in this population, which can artificially produce or obscure ADHD-related differences in rs-fcMRI metrics (Power et al., 2012a; Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Power et al., 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Dijk et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Subject matching based on mean FDi achieved no relationship between mean FDi and age (p = 0.63).
“We next employed a method that excluded subjects on the basis of their mean FD until there was no relationship between the measure and age (p = 0.63) as shown in Figure 5C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Prediction analyses and subtype comparisons controlled for potentially confounding variables (site, gender, and IQ) using multiple regression analysis.
“Importantly, these analyses were careful to consider potentially confounding variables (site, gender, and IQ) by controlling for them using multiple regression analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ADHD-200 Consortium demonstrates the utility of an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions in addressing the challenges of clarifying psychiatric heterogeneity and separating signal from artifact.
“As part of the ADHD-200 Global Competition and this special edition of Frontiers, the ADHD-200 Consortium demonstrates the utility of an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions in addressing these challenges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The limited effect of frame-to-frame covariate procedures on short-long range distinctions is likely due to the non-linear relationships between changes in BOLD and movement.
“The limited effect of these procedures on the short-long range distinctions is likely secondary to the non-linear relationships between changes in BOLD and movement (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The non-linear relationship between traditional motion parameters and BOLD signal violates the linearity assumptions of traditional preprocessing movement correction procedures (e.g., linear regression) for task and connectivity-based fMRI analyses.
“These findings violate the assumptions inherent to several traditional preprocessing movement correction procedures (e.g., linear regression), for both traditional task and connectivity-based fMRI analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Traditional motion correction does not adequately control for the changes in signal intensity that accompany abrupt changes in head position.
“Three recent reports (Power et al., 2012a; Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012) suggest that these assumptions are likely incorrect and that traditional motion correction does not adequately control for the changes in signal intensity that accompany abrupt changes in head position.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Power et al., 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Dijk et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In ADHD-I, functional connectivity differences were more evident in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal regions and cerebellum rather than in the default mode network.
“Although similar observations were present in the predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) functional connectivity differences were more evident in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal regions, and in the cerebellum, rather than in the default mode network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The relationship between traditional reference frame movement measurements and the BOLD signal can be misleading in some instances.
“we showed that the relationship between movement measurements based on traditional reference frame calculations can, in some instances, be misleading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The finding of prominent ADHD-I differences in fronto-parietal/cerebellar regions is largely consistent with the idea that ADHD-I is characterized mainly by problems in task level control systems.
“Given that ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention, this finding is largely consistent with the idea that this subtype is characterized mainly by problems in task level control systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention.
- Interpretationreasoning
Observed differences among ADHD subtypes can be understood in terms of their network distributions.
“observed differences among the subtypes can be understood in terms of their network distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Interpolation as a means of minimizing data loss can be counter-productive unless more elaborate approaches are developed and validated beyond the common methods attempted here.
“our simulations suggest that the introduction of interpolation as a means of minimizing data-loss can be counter-productive, unless more elaborate approaches are developed and validated beyond the common methods attempted here [e.g., Carp (2011)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carp (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The findings from the current study suggest that patterns of sensorimotor connectivity may prove effective in identifying ADHD, particularly those with the combined subtype.
“The findings from the current study further suggest that patterns of sensorimotor connectivity may prove effective in identifying ADHD, particularly those with the combined subtype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Classification analyses predicting individual diagnostic status based on functional connectivity highlight differential neural substrates for the two ADHD subtypes.
“Classification analyses aimed at predicting individual diagnostic status based on patterns of functional connectivity further highlight differential neural substrates for the two subtypes, and serve to provide a vision for future clinical applications of neuroimaging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Traditional functional connectivity and fMRI movement correction using linear regression are likely limited for micro-movement correction.
“As such, traditional functional connectivity and fMRI movement correction that utilize linear regression are likely to be limited with regard to micro-movement correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Graph-theoretic metrics implicate atypical connectivity across multiple systems in ADHD-C, particularly in the default network.
“Application of graph-theoretic metrics implicated atypical connectivity across multiple systems in the combined subtype (ADHD-C), particularly in the default network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ADHD-I may capture not simply a "less severe" form of ADHD-C, but a neurobiologically distinct syndrome.
“suggesting that ADHD-I may capture not simply a “less severe” form of ADHD-C, but a neurobiologically distinct syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The distributed nature of the current findings is likely suggestive of significantly more heterogeneity in the ADHD population.
“While the present work focused on testing the existing categorization among individuals with ADHD, the previous work highlighted above and the distributed nature of our current findings is likely suggestive of significantly more heterogeneity in this population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The work suggests that there is an ability to classify individuals based on disease status using information available from a brief MRI brain scan.
“The work provides several important outcomes, and suggests that there is an ability to classify individuals based on disease status using information available from a brief MRI brain scan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The present work made use of data aggregated across imaging sites that were not coordinated with respect to their recruitment, diagnostic, or imaging protocols.
“In addition, the present work made use of data aggregated across imaging sites that were not coordinated with respect to their recruitment, diagnostic, or imaging protocols—as such, marked site-related variation exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
This demonstration was accomplished even after the study's most conservative motion correction procedures.
“This demonstration was accomplished even after our most conservative motion correction procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The ability to make valid predictions in individuals with atypical functional neuroanatomy using rs-fcMRI data acquired across multiple institutions provides evidence that this approach can be fruitfully applied in translational studies of disorders with developmental origins.
“Nonetheless, the ability to make valid predictions in individuals with atypical functional neuroanatomy using rs-fcMRI data acquired across multiple institutions provides evidence that this approach can be fruitfully applied in translational studies of disorders with developmental origins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Marked site-related variation exists in the data.
“In addition, the present work made use of data aggregated across imaging sites that were not coordinated with respect to their recruitment, diagnostic, or imaging protocols—as such, marked site-related variation exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- May combine two claims. 44
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWith mean FD as a covariate (Procedure 5), the ability to make age predictions rose slightly from the original estimate (Procedure 1) to R2 = 0.39.
“Interestingly, while the short-long range effect was reduced, the ability to make age predictions in the data rose slightly from the original estimate (i.e. Procedure 1) with the movement correction procedures (R2 = 0.39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNode strength analysis for Procedures 5, 8, and 10 reveals a distributed pattern of connectivity predictive of age, with several subcortical structures highly predictive; connections that get stronger with age are within networks, and those that get weaker are between networks.
“The figure shows a distributed pattern of connectivity with several subcortical structures being highly predictive. Connections that tended to get stronger with age appeared to be within networks, and connections that got weaker with age were between networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFindings for Procedure 8 were consistent across individual sites.
“[Note: findings were consistent across individual sites (Figure A2)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdding frame-to-frame displacement (FDi) or frame-to-frame 6 motion parameters as covariates in partial correlation estimates only modestly alters the distinction between short- and long-range connections' relationships with age, while maintaining age prediction ability.
“As can be observed in Figures A1 and 4, the distinction between short- and long-range connections in terms of their relationships with age was only modestly altered by these additional correction procedures, while the ability to make age predictions was maintained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn simulation, the distance between original and simulated correlation matrices is low when few frames are removed, but the tight relationship degrades as the fraction of frames removed approaches 1.
“As can be seen, the distance is low when few frames are removed; however, the tight relationship degrades as the fraction of frames removed approaches 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombining volume censoring with mean FD matching (Procedure 8) reduces short- and long-range relationships but shows a slight decline in age classification ability (R2 = 0.34).
“This combined method also reduces the short- and long-range relationships (Figures 2 and 4), but shows a slight decline in the ability to make age classifications in individuals (R2 = 0.34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVolume censoring with FDi > 0.2 mm (Procedure 7) reduces but does not completely remove the distinction between short- and long-range connectivity in their relationships with age.
“While age-relationships were not completely removed, we once again see a reduction in the distinction noted between short- and long-range connectivity (Figures 2 and 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWith subject matching based on mean FDi (Procedure 6), the ability to make age predictions increased to R2 = 0.42.
“The ability to make age predictions increased (R2 = 0.42) (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn typically developing children, functional connections that become stronger with increasing age tend to link distant regions (long-range), while connections that become weaker with age are primarily between proximal regions (short-range).
“we found that connections that became stronger with increasing age, or “grew-up,” tended to link distant regions (i.e., long-range connections). Connections that became weaker with increasing age, or “grew-down,” were primarily found between proximal regions (i.e., short-range connections) (see Figures 2 and 4; p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith r-value correction using polynomial regression (Procedure 10), short- and long-range distinctions in age relationships were significantly reduced, while age prediction ability remained (R2 = 0.40).
“As with the other procedures, the short- and long-range distinctions in terms of age were significantly reduced, yet the ability to make age predictions remained (R2 = 0.40; Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is a positive but non-linear relationship between frame-to-frame motion parameters (FD) and changes in the whole brain BOLD signal.
“while the relationship of frame-to-frame motion parameters (i.e., FD) and changes in the whole brain signal is positive, there is still a non-linear relationship (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn typically developing children, SVR-based MVPA using rs-fcMRI provides robust age predictions, with Von Bertalanffy's growth curve model fitting brain maturity (R2 = 0.36).
“We also saw robust age-predictions for the TDC group. Von Bertalanffy's growth curve model ([a•(1 − e−bx)]) provided a significant fit for predicting brain maturity (Figure 3A) (R2 = 0.36).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect of FD on DVARS is similar across all ages (no strongly discernible relationship between movement effect on BOLD and age).
“Because there appears to be no strongly discernible relationships between the effect of movement on the BOLD signal and age (i.e., the effect of FD on DVARS is similar for all ages—Figure 5)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegional brain contributions associated with age or ADHD status were not equally distributed throughout the cortex, with some regions having many connections that strongly correlated with age or differentiated TDC from ADHD subjects and others having few or none.
“Regional brain contributions associated with age or ADHD status were not equally distributed throughout the cortex.”
- Also stated in: § Visualizing regional brain contributions · plain
“Some regions had many connections that strongly correlated with age (or differentiated TDC from ADHD subjects), while others had few or none.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Visualizing regional brain contributions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNodes most strongly differentiating ADHD-C from TDC were distributed across the cortex, most prominent in medial prefrontal and posterior parietal nodes of the default network, with other atypical regions in sensorimotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular systems.
“Nodes most strongly differentiating ADHD-C and TDC were distributed across the cortex (Figure 8), but were most prominent in the medial prefrontal and posterior parietal nodes of the default network. Other atypical regions included nodes of the sensorimotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMany developmental principles identified previously are still present even after stringent motion correction, while others are not.
“Similar to a recent report (Satterthwaite et al., 2012), our findings show that many of the developmental principles identified previously are still present even after stringent motion correction, while others are not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNetwork configuration appears similar to that of adults, even in younger ages, though not identical.
“Network configuration, while not identical, appears to be similar to that of adults, even in our younger ages, as shown in Figure A7 and in Power et al. (2012a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Power et al. (2012a)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAge-related growth curves were improved with several motion correction procedures, with the strongest age-related effects when using DVARS and matching as the surrogate measure for frame removal.
“Age-related growth curves were improved with several of the motion correction procedures, with the strongest age-related effects occurring when using DVARS and matching as the surrogate measure for frame removal (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor ADHD-I, consensus features were largely distributed across systems including prominent sensorimotor features, similar to ADHD-C, but the patterns between subtypes were distinct.
“Findings with regard to consensus features and ADHD-I were similar to those of ADHD-C in that they were largely distributed across systems including prominent features in the sensorimotor systems; however, the patterns between the subtypes were also quite distinct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataProcedures 8 and 10 revealed largely consistent findings with regard to overall patterns (Figure A4).
“As can be seen in Figure A4, procedures 8 and 10 revealed largely consistent findings with regard to overall patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFindings for both ADHD subtypes were relatively distributed, with each affecting only a subset of regions in any one network.
“Findings for both subtypes were relatively distributed, with each affecting only a subset of regions in any one network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSimulations suggest that correlation structure can be altered with frame removal, but the concern appears largest only after significant portions of frames are removed.
“Our simulations suggest that the correlation structure can be altered with frame removal; however, the concern appears to be largest only after significant portions of the frames are removed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile both subtypes revealed largely distributed atypical connectivity, findings for ADHD-C were more prominent in the default network.
“While both subtypes revealed largely distributed atypical connectivity, findings for the ADHD-C were more prominent in the default network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAge-related predictions are still possible and were even improved with motion correction procedures.
“For example, age-related predictions are still possible and were even improved with motion correction procedures (Dosenbach et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosenbach et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBoth populations showed atypical nodes in primary sensorimotor systems, supporting previous work implicating this system in ADHD.
“Both populations showed atypical nodes in primary sensorimotor systems, supporting previous work implicating this system in ADHD (Mostofsky et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mostofsky et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDespite potential differences across centers, there are brain features related to the presence of ADHD and ADHD subtype that are robust to this variation.
“Our findings suggest that despite potential differences across centers, there are brain features related to the presence of ADHD and ADHD subtype that are robust to this variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAbrupt head displacement typically manifests as signal loss in echo-planar imaging.
“This measure is based on the fact that abrupt head displacement typically manifests as signal loss in echo-planar imaging (Smyser et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smyser et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe modules used to categorize regions had a high quality index (Q) and were the most resistant to perturbation by randomization, measured by variation of information (VOI).
“The modules (i.e., communities) used to categorize regions had a high quality index (Q) and were the most resistant to perturbation by randomization, measured by variation of information (VOI) (Karrer et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karrer et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThese preprocessing steps are thought to reduce spurious variance unlikely to reflect neuronal activity.
“These preprocessing steps are thought to reduce spurious variance unlikely to reflect neuronal activity (Fox and Raichle, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fox and Raichle, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMotion can artificially produce or obscure ADHD-related differences in rs-fcMRI metrics.
“As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, ADHD presents exceptional challenges for fMRI-based research, due to importance of addressing the increased prevalence of motion in this population, which can artificially produce or obscure ADHD-related differences in rs-fcMRI metrics (Power et al., 2012a; Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Power et al., 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Dijk et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationrs-fcMRI results are remarkably reliable across imaging centers.
“and rs-fcMRI results are remarkably reliable across imaging centers (Biswal et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Biswal et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSubsample size was matched to avoid biasing the classifier group.
“To avoid biasing our classifier group, subsample size was matched (see Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitationrs-fcMRI yields consistent results across subjects, scans, and days.
“it yields consistent results across subjects, scans, and days (van de Ven et al., 2004; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Shehzad et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites van de Ven et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Damoiseaux et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shehzad et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataReplacing traditional movement parameters with frame-to-frame motion parameters in linear regression preprocessing will assist but likely not fully account for movement artifact.
“These data suggest that simply replacing traditional movement parameters with frame-to-frame motion parameters in traditional preprocessing steps (i.e., linear regression) will assist, but likely not fully account for potential movement artifact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe continued association between age and mean FD after volume censoring is likely due to a small increase in movement in younger subjects for remaining frames and a small relationship between DVARS and FD even under the 0.2 mm cutoff.
“This observation is likely due to a small increase in movement in younger subjects for the remaining frames and what can be observed as a small relationship of frame-to-frame changes in BOLD (i.e., DVARS) and FD even under this 0.2 mm cutoff (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSpontaneous neural activity is associated with correlated low-frequency (<~0.1 Hz) BOLD signal fluctuations in functionally related brain regions at rest.
“rs-fcMRI is based on the discovery that spontaneous neural activity (Biswal et al., 1995; Leopold et al., 2003; Nir et al., 2006; Scholvinck et al., 2010) is associated with correlated low-frequency (<~0.1 Hz) blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in functionally related brain regions at rest (Biswal et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Biswal et al., 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leopold et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nir et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFrame-to-frame changes in signal intensity related to movement are significantly greater than those caused by neurophysiologic changes in the BOLD signal.
“Because frame-to-frame changes in signal intensity related to movement are significantly greater than those caused by neurophysiologic changes in the BOLD signal, this measure provides a natural parameter with which to directly examine the relationship of movement measurements and the BOLD response (Smyser et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smyser et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitationrs-fcMRI can be used during sleep as well as during sedation.
“Importantly, rs-fcMRI can be used during sleep as well as during sedation (Fukunaga et al., 2006, 2008; Vincent et al., 2007; Greicius, 2008; Horovitz et al., 2008);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fukunaga et al., 2006, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vincent et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Greicius, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAs data for this investigation were aggregated retrospectively, slightly different ADHD assessment protocols were used across institutions.
“As data for this investigation were aggregated retrospectively (as a large collaborative effort), slightly different ADHD assessment protocols were used across institutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe large sample size in this study afforded the ability to examine conservative motion correction approaches, but other samples may not support the same opportunity.
“The large sample size here afforded us the ability to examine these conservative approaches, but other samples may not support the same opportunity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese approaches perform respectably for reducing artifact induced by changes in head position, but more robust procedures are likely to emerge.
“It should be emphasized, however, that while these approaches appear to perform respectably for reducing artifact induced by changes in head position, work in this area is currently ongoing and even more robust procedures are likely to emerge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent theories suggest the default network is associated with remembering the past, as well as planning for, and anticipating future events.
“Recent theories suggest the default network is associated with remembering the past, as well as planning for, and anticipating future events (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Buckner et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buckner and Carroll, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buckner et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe fronto-parietal network is believed to be an important system for task level control.
“The fronto-parietal network is believed to be an important system for task level control (Dosenbach et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosenbach et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChildren with ADHD show increased variability during performance of simple motor skills and during motor adaptation.
“Furthermore, in parallel with numerous recent studies showing ADHD-associated increases in intrasubject response time variability (Castellanos et al., 2005; Vaurio et al., 2009; Epstein et al., 2011), children with ADHD show increased variability during performance of simple motor skills and during motor adaptation (Izawa et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Izawa et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur findings demonstrate the potential utility of functional MRI approaches in characterizing clinical heterogeneity in ADHD, which should be similarly useful with other psychiatric disorders.
“In summary, our findings demonstrate the potential utility of functional MRI approaches in characterizing clinical heterogeneity in ADHD, which should be similarly useful with other psychiatric disorders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior.
“To that end, recent studies of motor cortex physiology using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) and that lower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior (Gilbert et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilbert et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies of gray matter thickness and connectivity measurements have shown that many of the same regions correspond to various forms of impulsivity measures.
“Studies of gray matter thickness (Shaw et al., 2007) and connectivity measurements (Shannon et al., 2011) have shown that many of these same regions correspond to various forms of impulsivity measures, supporting this claim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shaw et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shannon et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile significant changes occur throughout development, the general network structure appears intact at early ages.
“Thus, while significant changes do occur throughout development, the general network structure appears to be intact at early ages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataChanges in short- and long-range connectivity remain but are significantly reduced after motion correction procedures, indicating that the distance between connections that get weaker with age and those that get stronger overlap more than previously appreciated.
“However, while the changes in short- and long-range connectivity appear to remain, this phenomena is significantly reduced after motion correction procedures (and becomes only weakly significant for some procedures)—highlighting that the distance between those connections that get weaker with age and those that get stronger overlap more than was previously appreciated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent studies of motor cortex physiology using TMS reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI).
“To that end, recent studies of motor cortex physiology using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) and that lower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior (Gilbert et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilbert et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationImpairments in incentive salience, motivation, and reward processing are increasingly appreciated in ADHD.
“In particular, impairments in incentive salience, motivation, and reward processing are increasingly appreciated in ADHD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sagvolden et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Musser et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nigg and Casey (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChildren with ADHD often demonstrate difficulties with motor control, paralleling difficulties with higher-order executive control.
“Children with ADHD often demonstrate difficulties with motor control, paralleling difficulties with higher-order executive control (Pennington and Ozonoff, 1996; Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pennington and Ozonoff, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mostofsky et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese findings for ADHD-C are consistent with a growing body of studies implicating the default network in ADHD.
“These findings for ADHD-C are consistent with a growing body of studies implicating the default network in ADHD (Castellanos et al., 2008; Fassbender et al., 2009; Fair et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Castellanos et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fassbender et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fair et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA consistent characteristic of children with ADHD is that they fail to meet age-norms on timed repetitive and sequential movements and manifest a greater amount of motor overflow than age-matched controls.
“A consistent characteristic of children with ADHD is that they fail to meet age-norms on timed repetitive and sequential movements and manifest a greater amount of motor overflow than age-matched controls (Denckla and Rudel, 1978; Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Denckla and Rudel, 1978
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mostofsky et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth overflow and variability in motor execution have been found to be related to ADHD-associated impairments at the behavioral level.
“Both overflow and variability in motor execution have been found to be related to ADHD-associated impairments at the behavioral level (Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mostofsky et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe dorsolateral prefrontal and cerebellar nodes have been empirically linked to fronto-parietal systems by community detection methods.
“These particular nodes (see Figure A6) have been empirically linked with community detection methods to fronto-parietal systems (black/yellow) (Dosenbach et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosenbach et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThese data highlight the need to take careful consideration of movement-related artifact in all connectivity studies, particularly during classification of clinical samples.
“Most importantly, however, these data in aggregate highlight the need to take careful consideration of movement related artifact in all connectivity studies, particularly during classification of clinical samples as noted below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProcedure 10 cannot completely resolve the issues of frame removal; it still relies on a valid estimate of the correlation structure after removing frames and requires participant removal when a high degree of motion is present.
“The results were promising, but the method is not able to completely resolve the issues noted by frame removal. The method still relies on a valid estimate of the correlation structure after removing frames, and thus still requires participant removal when a high degree of motion is present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSeveral motion correction methods appeared relatively robust at controlling for motion artifact in the BOLD signal, and all reduced the distinction between short- and long-range connections in their relationships with age.
“we found several methods that appeared relatively robust at controlling for motion artifact in the BOLD signal. All of these additional approaches reduced the distinction between short- and long-range connections in terms of their relationships with age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFrame-to-frame measurements (FD) also share a non-linear relationship with the BOLD signal, so simple linear regression of these measurements provides only limited improvement for motion artifacts.
“while frame-to-frame measurements (i.e., FD), appear to be superior with relation to the assumption of linearity, they too share a non-linear relationship with the BOLD signal. Thus, simple linear regression of these measurements from the BOLD signal also provides only limited improvement with regard to motion artifacts (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFrame removal approaches reduce sample size due to matching or effectively removing subjects, thus reducing statistical power.
“In particular, the approaches reduce sample size due to “matching” (i.e., subject exclusion) or, effectively removing subjects due to the high percentage of frames removed. Thus, statistical power is reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis work does not consider the possibility that the differences noted here could be unique to the effort required to remain still in the ADHD population.
“Last, we mention that this work does not consider the possibility that the differences noted here could be unique to the effort required to remain still in the ADHD population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese results suggest that ADHD-I has distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in control systems, which may underlie the prominent inattentive symptoms in this population.
“Taken together, these results suggest that ADHD-I has distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in control systems, which may underlie the prominent inattentive symptoms in this population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWhile the study's movement correction procedures were carefully considered, there is still room for improvement in controlling for the movement confound.
“Notably, while our movement correction procedures were carefully considered, there is still room for improvement in controlling for this confound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataADHD-C also shows distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in systems such as the default network, which may mark for an inability to exert top-down attentional control-perhaps in the context of an inability to integrate contextual information supported by default mode processing.
“ADHD-C also shows distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in systems such as the default network, which may mark for an inability to exert top-down attentional control—perhaps in the context of an inability to integrate contextual information supported by default mode processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese findings point to potential distinct connectivity patterns underlying ADHD subtypes, but also emphasize the vast heterogeneity in these populations.
“These findings point to potential distinct connectivity patterns underlying ADHD subtypes, but also emphasizes the vast heterogeneity in these populations, which will need to be considered in future clinical investigations of ADHD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings presented here highlight the translational potential of rs-fcMRI for developmental neuropsychiatric disorders in general by demonstrating the ability of SVM-based MVPA to classify individuals with the disorder using rs-fcMRI.
“Beyond a simple characterization of the neural signatures of ADHD subtypes, the findings presented here highlight the translational potential of rs-fcMRI for developmental neuropsychiatric disorders in general by demonstrating the ability of SVM-based MVPA to classify individuals with the disorder using the rs-fcMRI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The hyperactive-impulsive subtype is relatively rare in the age ranges studied.
“we omit the hyperactive-impulsive subtype due to its relative rarity in the age ranges studied”
The paper relies on this without support.
The neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.
“given the growing consensus that the neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Imaging studies have generally ignored distinctions among ADHD subtypes.
“imaging studies have generally ignored these distinctions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
“Using mean FD as a covariate (i.e., Procedure 5) with age assumes that movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.
“For each of these subjects we than calculated their correlation matrix across the 160 ROIs, which served as our baseline (i.e., the true correlation structure).”
The paper relies on this without support.
ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention.
“Given that ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention”
The paper relies on this without support.
ADHD relies on strict symptom counts and the DSM-IV system for identifying ADHD-I includes participants who are subthreshold for hyperactivity.
“We note that ADHD relies on strict symptom counts and the DSM-IV system for identifying ADHD-I includes participants who are subthreshold for hyperactivity.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distinctions between these subgroups are consistent with prior research characterizing heterogeneity in typical and ADHD samples.
“The distinctions between these subgroups are consistent with prior research, which characterized heterogeneity in typical and ADHD samples and found multiple subgroups characterized by either a small spatial span, slow RT, and high information processing, or high spatial span, fast RT and low information processing71.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Prior work by Fair et al. has shown similar heterogeneity in both typically developing and ADHD children, and accounting for this heterogeneity improved diagnostic accuracy.
“Prior work by Fair et al. has shown similar heterogeneity in both TD and ADHD children; as with Katuwal, taking into account this heterogeneity improved diagnostic accuracy 71.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Variation within the ASD subgroups may be nested within the normal variation found in brain networks across typical children.
“it is possible that variation within the ASD subgroups identified here may actually be “nested” within the normal variation found in brain networks across typical children 1,71,91”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
This approach extends prior work that seeks to cluster and identify clinically important subgroups.
“Therefore, this approach extends prior work that seeks to cluster and identify clinically important subgroups 71.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Prior identification of subgroups has relied on calculating the distance between each individual directly.
“Prior identification of subgroups have relied on calculating the distance between each individual directly 102.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [102]
Most evidence for this phenomenon has been from neuropsychological data and behavior or symptom report, with recent evidence suggesting heterogeneity in the biological components as well.
“Most evidence for this phenomenon has been from neuropsychological data and behavior or symptom report (e.g., [2]), with recent evidence suggesting heterogeneity in the biological components as well [48].”
From Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Stated age range excludes a reported site mean
MajorThe Methods section limits participants to ages 7-14, but Table 1 reports a mean age of 16.09 for the 82 WashU controls. A group entirely within the stated range cannot have that mean.
“Data from Brown University, Beijing Normal University, Kennedy Krieger Institute, New York University Child Study Center, Washington University at St. Louis, and Oregon Health and Science University were aggregated for youth ages 7–14 years.”
“| WashU | 82 | 16.09 | 48 | 0.11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |”
ADHD-I total mean age disagrees with site means
MinorWeighting the five reported ADHD-I site mean ages by their respective sample sizes gives 11.4065 years, or 11.41 to two decimal places, rather than the total-row value of 11.45. Rounding of the site means cannot account for the difference.
“| Total | 455 | 14.39 | 50 | 0.10 | 80 | 11.45 | 27 | 0.11 | 112 | 10.31 | 19 | 0.11 |”
“| Brown | 6 | 12.38 | 83 | 0.11 | 1 | 14.70 | 0 | 0.00 | 5 | 11.86 | 80 | 0.11 | | NYU | 65 | 15.54 | 54 | 0.10 | 15 | 10.54 | 47 | 0.12 | 37 | 9.95 | 16 | 0.11 | | Beijing Normal | 176 | 13.63 | 44 | 0.10 | 48 | 12.14 | 17 | 0.11 | 40 | 11.25 | 05 | 0.11 | | JHU | 70 | 13.78 | 53 | 0.09 | 5 | 11.27 | 20 | 0.08 | 14 | 9.77 | 50 | 0.09 | | OHSU | 56 | 13.94 | 59 | 0.11 | 11 | 9.15 | 45 | 0.11 | 16 | 8.80 | 13 | 0.11 |”
Procedure 6 age-movement p-value differs between text and figure caption
MinorThe text reports p = 0.63 for the relationship between mean FD and age after Procedure 6 matching, whereas the Figure 5 caption reports p = 0.62 for that same relationship.
“there was no relationship between the measure and age (p = 0.63) as shown in Figure 5C”
“(C) Mean FD as a function of age for Procedure 6 (matching only without frame removal). Again, here there is no relationship with mean FD and age (p = 0.62).”
Pooled dataset is described as coming from five institutions, but six are listed
MinorThe paper says the aggregate dataset was pooled across five institutions, but its Methods section names six institutions contributing data.
“an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions”
“Data from Brown University, Beijing Normal University, Kennedy Krieger Institute, New York University Child Study Center, Washington University at St. Louis, and Oregon Health and Science University were aggregated”
Cites
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256 · see citing works
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798 · see citing works
KAUFMAN, J., BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D., RAO, U., FLYNN, C., MORECI, P., WILLIAMSON, D., & RYAN, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · Cited by 10,148 · see citing works
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812 · see citing works
<i>The Brain's Default Network</i>: <i>Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease</i>
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761 · see citing works
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553 · see citing works
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565 · see citing works
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 · Cited by 7,429 · see citing works
Self-citationSpontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700 · see citing works
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects
Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601417103 · Cited by 4,326 · see citing works
Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research
Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, G., Kafkafi, N., & Golani, I. (2001) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00297-2 · Cited by 4,146 · see citing works
SHAFFER, D., FISHER, P., LUCAS, C. P., DULCAN, M. K., & SCHWAB-STONE, M. E. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014 · Cited by 3,505 · see citing works
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Children with ADHD often demonstrate difficulties with motor control, paralleling difficulties with higher-order executive control (Pennington and Ozonoff, 1996; Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
BackgroundToward discovery science of human brain function
Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X.-N., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., Beckmann, C. F., Adelstein, J. S., Buckner, R. L., Colcombe, S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107 · Cited by 2,970 · see citing works
Self-citationBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691 · see citing works
Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Miezin, F. M., Cohen, A. L., Wenger, K. K., Dosenbach, R. A. T., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Raichle, M. E., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704320104 · Cited by 2,632 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Van Dijk, K. R. A., Sabuncu, M. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044 · Cited by 2,344 · see citing works
Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data
Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.005 · Cited by 2,271 · see citing works
Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Nardos, B., Cohen, A. L., Fair, D. A., Power, J. D., Church, J. A., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Vogel, A. C., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194144 · Cited by 2,183 · see citing works
Self-citation(1998) · Cited by 2,026 · see citing works
A dual-networks architecture of top-down control
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.001 · Cited by 1,931 · see citing works
Self-citationVan Dijk, K. R. A., Hedden, T., Venkataraman, A., Evans, K. C., Lazar, S. W., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00783.2009 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation
Shaw, P., Eckstrand, K., Sharp, W., Blumenthal, J., Lerch, J. P., Greenstein, D., Clasen, L., Evans, A., Giedd, J., & Rapoport, J. L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707741104 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain
Vincent, J. L., Patel, G. H., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Baker, J. T., Van Essen, D. C., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, L. H., Corbetta, M., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05758 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview
Pereira, F., Mitchell, T., & Botvinick, M. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.007 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
Functional brain networks develop from a local to distributed organization
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Power, J. D., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
Self-citationThe maturing architecture of the brain's default network
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Barch, D. M., Raichle, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800376105 · Cited by 1,314 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of distinct control networks through segregation and integration
Fair, D. A., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Cohen, A. L., Brahmbhatt, S., Miezin, F. M., Barch, D. M., Raichle, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705843104 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
Self-citationResting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders
Greicius, M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e328306f2c5 · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction
Castellanos, F. X., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Milham, M. P., & Tannock, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.011 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Self-citationA Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex
Van Essen, D. C. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Loughead, J., Ruparel, K., Elliott, M. A., Hakonarson, H., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex
Essen, D. C. V., Drury, H. A., Dickson, J., Harwell, J., Hanlon, D., & Anderson, C. H. (2001) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2001.0080443 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
sagvolden, T., johansen, E. B., aase, H., & russell, V. A. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000075 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Miezin, F. M., Maccotta, L., Ollinger, J., Petersen, S., & Buckner, R. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0568 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity
Schölvinck, M. L., Maier, A., Ye, F. Q., Duyn, J. H., & Leopold, D. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107 · Cited by 939 · see citing works
The Resting Brain: Unconstrained yet Reliable
Shehzad, Z. E., Kelly, C. A. M., Reiss, P. T., Gee, D. G., Gotimer, K., Uddin, L. Q., Lee, S. H., Margulies, D. S., Roy, A. K., Biswal, B. B., et al. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn256 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citationCATTELL, J. M. (1923) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/000271622311000117 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes.
Willcutt, E. G., Nigg, J. T., Pennington, B. F., Solanto, M. V., Rohde, L. A., Tannock, R., Loo, S. K., Carlson, C. L., McBurnett, K., & Lahey, B. B. (2012) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027347 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Self-citationWeight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.069 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Castellanos, F. X., Margulies, D. S., Kelly, C., Uddin, L. Q., Ghaffari, M., Kirsch, A., Shaw, D., Shehzad, Z., Di Martino, A., Biswal, B., et al. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.025 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of large-scale functional brain networks in children
Supekar, K., Musen, M., & Menon, V. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000157 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Longitudinal Analysis of Neural Network Development in Preterm Infants
Smyser, C. D., Inder, T. E., Shimony, J. S., Hill, J. E., Degnan, A. J., Snyder, A. Z., & Neil, J. J. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq035 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks
Meunier, D., Achard, S., Morcom, A., & Bullmore, E. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.062 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain
Hagmann, P., Sporns, O., Madan, N., Cammoun, L., Pienaar, R., Wedeen, V. J., Meuli, R., Thiran, J.-P., & Grant, P. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009073107 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Very Slow Activity Fluctuations in Monkey Visual Cortex: Implications for Functional Brain Imaging
Leopold, D. A. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/13.4.422 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Fair, D. A., Schlaggar, B. L., Cohen, A. L., Miezin, F. M., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Wenger, K. K., Fox, M., Snyder, A. Z., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Self-citationNIGG, J. T., & CASEY, B. J. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050376 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationHorovitz, S. G., Fukunaga, M., de Zwart, J. A., van Gelderen, P., Fulton, S. C., Balkin, T. J., & Duyn, J. H. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20428 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Development of Anterior Cingulate Functional Connectivity from Late Childhood to Early Adulthood
Kelly, A. M. C., Di Martino, A., Uddin, L. Q., Shehzad, Z., Gee, D. G., Reiss, P. T., Margulies, D. S., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn117 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Self-citationVarieties of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Related Intra-Individual Variability
Castellanos, F. X., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Scheres, A., Di Martino, A., Hyde, C., & Walters, J. R. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.005 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Self-citationvan de Ven, V. G., Formisano, E., Prvulovic, D., Röder, C. H., & Linden, D. E. J. (2004) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20022 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Milham, M. P., Fair, D. A., Mennes, M., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2012) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Self-citationResponse Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Mostofsky, S. H., & Simmonds, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20500 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Self-citationMartino, F. D., Valente, G., Staeren, N., Ashburner, J., Goebel, R., & Formisano, E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.037 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Fair, D. A., Bathula, D., Nikolas, M. A., & Nigg, J. T. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115365109 · Cited by 464 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…datasets, with coordinated recruitment, deep phenotyping, multimodal data acquisition (e.g., rs-fcMRI, diffusion imaging, ASL), and likely improved homogeneity in our subgrouping (Fair et al., 2012) that a fair assessment of the predictive potential of MR-based approaches will be realized.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFukunaga, M., Horovitz, S. G., van Gelderen, P., de Zwart, J. A., Jansma, J. M., Ikonomidou, V. N., Chu, R., Deckers, R., Leopold, D. A., & Duyn, J. H. (2006) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.04.018 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Atypical default network connectivity in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Fair, D. A., Posner, J., Nagel, B. J., Bathula, D., Dias, T. G. C., Mills, K. L., Blythe, M. S., Giwa, A., Schmitt, C. F., & Nigg, J. T. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.003 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationRobustness of community structure in networks
Karrer, B., Levina, E., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.046119 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Steps toward optimizing motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.017 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationApplications of fMRI in translational medicine and clinical practice
Matthews, P. M., Honey, G. D., & Bullmore, E. T. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1929 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
A lack of default network suppression is linked to increased distractibility in ADHD
Fassbender, C., Zhang, H., Buzy, W. M., Cortes, C. R., Mizuiri, D., Beckett, L., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.070 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Self-citationA modality‐independent approach to spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain
Lancaster, J. L., Glass, T. G., Lankipalli, B. R., Downs, H., Mayberg, H. S., & Fox, P. T. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030305 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Vaurio, R. G., Simmonds, D. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.022 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationEpstein, J. N., Langberg, J. M., Rosen, P. J., Graham, A., Narad, M. E., Antonini, T. N., Brinkman, W. B., Froehlich, T., Simon, J. O., & Altaye, M. (2011) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0022155 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Anomalies of motor development in hyperactive boys
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1978) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410030308 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Cao, X., Cao, Q., Long, X., Sun, L., Sui, M., Zhu, C., Zuo, X., Zang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.029 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationNir, Y., Hasson, U., Levy, I., Yeshurun, Y., & Malach, R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.018 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Mostofsky, S. H., Rimrodt, S. L., Schafer, J. G. B., Boyce, A., Goldberg, M. C., Pekar, J. J., & DENCKLA, M. B. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.011 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationIzawa, J., Pekny, S. E., Marko, M. K., Haswell, C. C., Shadmehr, R., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2012) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1222 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationCosta Dias, T. G., Wilson, V. B., Bathula, D. R., Iyer, S. P., Mills, K. L., Thurlow, B. L., Stevens, C. A., Musser, E. D., Carpenter, S. D., Grayson, D. S., et al. (2013) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.10.015 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationMusser, E. D., Backs, R. W., Schmitt, C. F., Ablow, J. C., Measelle, J. R., & Nigg, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9499-1 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimizing the order of operations for movement scrubbing: Comment on Power et al.
Carp, J. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.061 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Overflow Movements Predict Impaired Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD
Mostofsky, S. H., Newschaffer, C. J., & DENCKLA, M. B. (2003) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1315 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationLahey, B. B., & Willcutt, E. G. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2010.517173 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Premotor functional connectivity predicts impulsivity in juvenile offenders
Shannon, B. J., Raichle, M. E., Snyder, A. Z., Fair, D. A., Mills, K. L., Zhang, D., Bache, K., Calhoun, V. D., Nigg, J. T., Nagel, B. J., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1108241108 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationMills, K. L., Bathula, D., Dias, T. G. C., Iyer, S. P., Fenesy, M. C., Musser, E. D., Stevens, C. A., Thurlow, B. L., Carpenter, S. D., Nagel, B. J., et al. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00002 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationRizk-Jackson, A., Stoffers, D., Sheldon, S., Kuperman, J., Dale, A., Goldstein, J., Corey-Bloom, J., Poldrack, R. A., & Aron, A. R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.273 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Gilbert, D. L., Ridel, K. R., Sallee, F. R., Zhang, J., Lipps, T. D., & Wassermann, E. M. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300806 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Metabolic Origin of Bold Signal Fluctuations in the Absence of Stimuli
Fukunaga, M., Horovitz, S. G., de Zwart, J. A., van Gelderen, P., Balkin, T. J., Braun, A. R., & Duyn, J. H. (2008) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2008.25 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Erhardt, D., March, J. S., & Swanson, J. M. (1997) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.467 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Fair, D. A., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370877-9.00027-x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationOVERFLOW MOVEMENTS PREDICT IMPAIRED RESPONSE INHIBITION IN CHILDREN WITH ADHD
Mostofsky, S. H. (2003) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.97.7.1315-1331 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Conners C. K. (2008). Conners 3rd Edition Manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging
Yan, C., Wang, X., Zuo, X., & Zang, Y. (2016) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4 · Cited by 3,906 · see citing works
Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X.-N., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 · Cited by 3,657 · see citing works
Di Martino, A., Yan, C.-G., Li, Q., Denio, E., Castellanos, F. X., Alaerts, K., Anderson, J. S., Assaf, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., Dapretto, M., et al. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2013.78 · Cited by 2,780 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites
Casey, B. J., Cannonier, T., Conley, M. I., Cohen, A. O., Barch, D. M., Heitzeg, M. M., Soules, M. E., Teslovich, T., Dellarco, D. V., Garavan, H., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001 · Cited by 2,167 · see citing works
Self-citationICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data
Pruim, R. H. R., Mennes, M., van Rooij, D., Llera, A., Buitelaar, J. K., & Beckmann, C. F. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.064 · Cited by 1,684 · see citing works
Self-citationFunction in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior
Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., Corbetta, M., Glasser, M. F., Curtiss, S., Dixit, S., Feldt, C., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.033 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Self-citationYan, C.-G., Cheung, B., Kelly, C., Colcombe, S., Craddock, R. C., Di Martino, A., Li, Q., Zuo, X.-N., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004 · Cited by 1,461 · see citing works
Self-citationPrecision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains
Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Gilmore, A. W., Newbold, D. J., Greene, D. J., Berg, J. J., Ortega, M., Hoyt-Drazen, C., Gratton, C., Sun, H., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.011 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Self-citationImage processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study
Hagler, D. J., Hatton, S. N., Cornejo, M. D., Makowski, C., Fair, D. A., Dick, A. S., Sutherland, M. T., Casey, B. J., Barch, D. M., Harms, M. P., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Self-citationCiric, R., Wolf, D. H., Power, J. D., Roalf, D. R., Baum, G. L., Ruparel, K., Shinohara, R. T., Elliott, M. A., Eickhoff, S. B., Davatzikos, C., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.020 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls
Arbabshirani, M. R., Plis, S., Sui, J., & Calhoun, V. D. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Gratton, C., Laumann, T. O., Nielsen, A. N., Greene, D. J., Gordon, E. M., Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., Coalson, R. S., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Self-citationFarahani, F. V., Karwowski, W., & Lighthall, N. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00585 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Deriving reproducible biomarkers from multi-site resting-state data: An Autism-based example
Abraham, A., Milham, M. P., Di Martino, A., Craddock, R. C., Samaras, D., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.045 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II
Martino, A. D., O’Connor, D. A., Chen, B., Alaerts, K., Anderson, J. S., Assaf, M., Balsters, J. H., Baxter, L. C., Beggiato, A., Bernaerts, S., et al. (2017) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.10 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Self-citationZuo, X., & Xing, X.-X. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Menon, V. (2015) · Brain Mapping · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00052-x · Cited by 625 · see citing works
The Heterogeneity Problem: Approaches to Identify Psychiatric Subtypes
Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Marr, M., Graham, A. M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.009 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Self-citationYan, C.-G., Craddock, R. C., Zuo, X.-N., Zang, Y.-F., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.081 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Self-citationReduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor
Muschelli, J., Nebel, M. B., Caffo, B. S., Barber, A. D., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.028 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
Römer, D., Reyna, V. F., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Grayson, D. S., & Fair, D. A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.079 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
“…consistently implicated in Schizophrenia (Baker et al., 2014; Khadka et al., 2013; Satterthwaite et al., 2015), ADHD (Castellanos and Aoki, 2016; Fair et al., 2012b), and Autism (Kessler et al., 2016; Moseley et al., 2015; Supekar et al., 2013) – though a thorough examination of this literature…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationLinked Sex Differences in Cognition and Functional Connectivity in Youth
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Roalf, D. R., Ruparel, K., Erus, G., Vandekar, S., Gennatas, E. D., Elliott, M. A., Smith, A. C. W., Hakonarson, H. H., et al. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu036 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Rudolph, M. D., Graham, A. M., Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Rasmussen, J. M., Nardos, R., Entringer, S., Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., & Fair, D. A. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0128-y · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerson, R. W., Adams, C., Nishino, T., Hazlett, H. C., Wolff, J. J., Zwaigenbaum, L., Constantino, J. N., Shen, M. D., Swanson, M. R., Elison, J. T., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2882 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Neuro Bureau ADHD-200 Preprocessed repository
Bellec, P., Chu, C., Chouinard-Decorte, F., Benhajali, Y., Margulies, D. S., & Craddock, R. C. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.034 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Segregated Systems of Human Brain Networks
Wig, G. S. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.006 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Unraveling the Miswired Connectome: A Developmental Perspective
Martino, A. D., Fair, D. A., Kelly, C. A. M., Satterthwaite, T. D., Castellanos, F. X., Thomason, M. E., Craddock, R. C., Luna, B., LEVENTHAL, B. L., Zuo, X., et al. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.050 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationChildhood Trauma Exposure Disrupts the Automatic Regulation of Emotional Processing
Marusak, H. A., Martin, K. R., Etkin, A., & Thomason, M. E. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.311 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Developmental pathways to functional brain networks: emerging principles
Menon, V. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.015 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Karalunas, S. L., Fair, D., Musser, E. D., Aykes, K., Iyer, S. P., & Nigg, J. T. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.763 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractedThe contribution of network organization and integration to the development of cognitive control
Marek, S., Hwang, K., Foran, W., Hallquist, M. N., & Luna, B. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002328 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationLenartowicz, A., & Loo, S. K. (2014) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-014-0498-0 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Du, Y., Fu, Z., & Calhoun, V. D. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00525 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Clinical applications of the functional connectome
Castellanos, F. X., Di Martino, A., Craddock, R. C., Mehta, A. D., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.083 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-citationLongitudinal Growth Curves of Brain Function Underlying Inhibitory Control through Adolescence
Ordaz, S. J., Foran, W., Velanova, K., & Luna, B. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1741-13.2013 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Koller, J. M., Earl, E., Miranda-Domínguez, Ó., Klein, R. L., Van, A. N., Snyder, A. Z., Nagel, B. J., Nigg, J. T., Nguyen, A. L., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.025 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Self-citationGraham, A. M., Rasmussen, J. M., Rudolph, M. D., Heim, C. M., Gilmore, J. H., Styner, M., Potkin, S. G., Entringer, S., Wadhwa, P. D., Fair, D. A., et al. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.027 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurobiological basis of head motion in brain imaging
Zeng, L., Wang, D., Fox, M., Sabuncu, M. R., Hu, D., Ge, M., Buckner, R. L., & Liu, H. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317424111 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Erus, G., Ruparel, K., Elliott, M. A., Gennatas, E. D., Hopson, R., Jackson, C., Prabhakaran, K., Bilker, W. B., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2345-13.2013 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Stoodley, C. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00092 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development
Mills, K. L., & Tamnes, C. K. (2014) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.04.004 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Self-citationPosner, J., Park, C., & Wang, Z. (2014) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9251-z · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior
Siegel, J. S., Mitra, A., Laumann, T. O., Seitzman, B. A., Raichle, M. E., Corbetta, M., & Snyder, A. Z. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw253 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Ruparel, K., Erus, G., Elliott, M. A., Eickhoff, S. B., Gennatas, E. D., Jackson, C., Prabhakaran, K., Smith, A., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.045 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Sripada, C., Kessler, D. A., & Angstadt, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1407787111 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
The development of brain network hubs
Oldham, S., & Fornito, A. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.005 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis
Khosla, M., Jamison, K. W., Ngo, G. H., Kuceyeski, A. F., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.031 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
A review of resting-state fMRI and its use to examine psychiatric disorders
Canario, E., Chen, D. Y., & Biswal, B. B. (2021) · Psychoradiology · doi:10.1093/psyrad/kkab003 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates
Fair, D. A., Miranda-Domínguez, Ó., Snyder, A. Z., Perrone, A. J., Earl, E., Van, A. N., Koller, J. M., Feczko, E., Tisdall, M. D., van der Kouwe, A. J. W., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116400 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman Connectomics across the Life Span
Zuo, X., He, Y., Betzel, R. F., Colcombe, S. J., Sporns, O., & Milham, M. P. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.005 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationWolfers, T., Beckmann, C. F., Hoogman, M., Buitelaar, J. K., Franke, B., & Marquand, A. F. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719000084 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationGraham, A. M., Rasmussen, J. M., Entringer, S., Ben Ward, E., Rudolph, M. D., Gilmore, J. H., Styner, M., Wadhwa, P. D., Fair, D. A., & Buss, C. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.06.023 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Reorganization of the Locomotor Network in Parkinson Patients with Freezing of Gait
Fling, B. W., Cohen, R. G., Mancini, M., Carpenter, S. D., Fair, D. A., Nutt, J. G., & Horak, F. B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100291 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationConnectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome
Miranda-Dominguez, O., Mills, B. D., Carpenter, S. D., Grant, K. A., Kroenke, C. D., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111048 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationBehavioral interventions for reducing head motion during MRI scans in children
Greene, D. J., Koller, J. M., Hampton, J. M., Wesevich, V. G., Van, A. N., Nguyen, A. L., Hoyt, C. R., McIntyre, L., Earl, E., Klein, R. L., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.023 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationAddressing head motion dependencies for small-world topologies in functional connectomics
Yan, C., Craddock, R. C., Yong He, A., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00910 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationDisrupted network architecture of the resting brain in attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Sripada, C., Kessler, D. A., Fang, Y., Welsh, R. C., Kumar, K. P., & Angstadt, M. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22504 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Structural and functional rich club organization of the brain in children and adults
Grayson, D. S., Ray, S., Carpenter, S., Iyer, S., Dias, T. G. C., Stevens, C., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088297 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationCastellanos, F. X., & Aoki, Y. Y. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.004 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationA multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies
Shehzad, Z. E., Kelly, C. A. M., Reiss, P. T., Craddock, R. C., Emerson, J. W., McMahon, K. L., Copland, D. A., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.024 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationGuo, X., Dominick, K. C., Minai, A. A., Li, H., Erickson, C. A., & Lu, L. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00460 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm
Feczko, E., Balba, N. M., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Cordova, M., Karalunas, S. L., Irwin, L., Demeter, D. V., Hill, A. P., Langhorst, B. H., Grieser Painter, J., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.044 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationSripada, R. K., Swain, J. E., Evans, G. W., Welsh, R. C., & Liberzon, I. (2014) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.75 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Prediction complements explanation in understanding the developing brain
Rosenberg, M. D., Casey, B. J., & Holmes, A. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02887-9 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Functional Evidence for a Cerebellar Node of the Dorsal Attention Network
Brissenden, J. A., Levin, E. J., Osher, D. E., Halko, M. A., & Somers, D. C. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0344-16.2016 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Deshpande, G., Wang, P., Rangaprakash, D., & Wilamowski, B. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2379621 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Towards a brain‐based predictome of mental illness
Rashid, B., & Calhoun, V. D. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25013 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Sun, H., Chen, Y., Huang, Q., Lui, S., Huang, X., Shi, Y., Xu, X., Sweeney, J. A., & Gong, Q. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170226 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Functional and structural connectivity of frontostriatal circuitry in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Delmonte, S., Gallagher, L., O’Hanlon, E., McGrath, J., & Balsters, J. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00430 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Imaging Functional and Structural Brain Connectomics in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Cao, M., Shu, N., Cao, Q., Wang, Y., & Yong He, A. (2014) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-014-8685-x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationRay, S., Miller, M., Karalunas, S., Robertson, C., Grayson, D. S., Cary, R. P., Hawkey, E., Painter, J. G., Kriz, D., Fombonne, E., et al. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22603 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationToward Developmental Connectomics of the Human Brain
Cao, M., Huang, H., Peng, Y., Dong, Q., & Yong He, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00025 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Imaging the ADHD brain: disorder-specificity, medication effects and clinical translation
Rubia, K., Alegria, A., & Brinson, H. (2014) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.907526 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Prediction of brain maturity in infants using machine-learning algorithms
Smyser, C. D., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Smyser, T. A., Snyder, A. Z., Rogers, C. E., Inder, T. E., Schlaggar, B. L., & Neil, J. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.029 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationMonti, M. M., Lutkenhoff, E. S., Rubinov, M., Boveroux, P., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Gosseries, O., Bruno, M., Noirhomme, Q., Boly, M., & Laureys, S. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003271 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Unsupervised Classification During Time-Series Model Building
Gates, K. M., Lane, S., Varangis, E. M. L., Giovanello, K. S., & Guiskewicz, K. (2016) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1256187 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Toward a revised nosology for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder heterogeneity
Nigg, J. T., Karalunas, S. L., Feczko, E., & Fair, D. A. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.005 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationMiranda-Dominguez, O., Mills, B. D., Grayson, D., Woodall, A., Grant, K. A., Kroenke, C. D., & Fair, D. A. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4229-13.2014 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationIntrinsic Functional Brain Architecture Derived from Graph Theoretical Analysis in the Human Fetus
Thomason, M. E., Brown, J. A., Dassanayake, M. T., Shastri, R., Marusak, H. A., Hernandez-Andrade, E., Yeo, L., Mody, S., Berman, S., Hassan, S. S., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094423 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Machine Learning With Neuroimaging: Evaluating Its Applications in Psychiatry
Nielsen, A. N., Barch, D. M., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., & Greene, D. J. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.007 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationAltered amygdala connectivity in urban youth exposed to trauma
Thomason, M. E., Marusak, H. A., Tocco, M. A., Vila, A. M., McGarragle, O., & Rosenberg, D. R. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv030 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“Overall, residual movement was well within accepted standards (< 1.5 mm translational rms; cf. Fair et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialEslami, T., Almuqhim, F., Raiker, J. S., & Saeed, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2020.575999 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Computational neuroscience approach to biomarkers and treatments for mental disorders
Yahata, N., Kasai, K., & Kawato, M. (2016) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12502 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
FOCUS: Detecting ADHD Patients by an EEG-Based Serious Game
Alchalabi, A. E., Shirmohammadi, S., Eddin, A. N., & Elsharnouby, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2018.2838158 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?
Zhang, J., Kucyi, A., Raya, J., Nielsen, A. N., Nomi, J. S., Damoiseaux, J. S., Greene, D. J., Horovitz, S. G., Uddin, L. Q., & Whitfield, S. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118466 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Hierarchical functional system development supports executive function
Keller, A. S., Sydnor, V. J., Pines, A. R., Fair, D. A., Bassett, D. S., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.005 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationImplications of newborn amygdala connectivity for fear and cognitive development at 6-months-of-age
Graham, A. M., Buss, C., Rasmussen, J. M., Rudolph, M. D., Demeter, D. V., Gilmore, J. H., Styner, M., Entringer, S., Wadhwa, P. D., & Fair, D. A. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.09.006 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationMarek, S. A., Tervo‐Clemmens, B., Nielsen, A. N., Wheelock, M. D., Miller, R. L., Laumann, T. O., Earl, E., Foran, W., Cordova, M., Doyle, O. J., et al. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100706 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Matthews, M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2013) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45758-0_249 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationHeritability of the human connectome: A connectotyping study
Miranda-Domínguez, Ó., Feczko, E., Grayson, D. S., Walum, H., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2017) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00029 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI
Baum, G. L., Roalf, D. R., Cook, P. A., Ciric, R., Rosen, A. F. G., Xia, C., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., Verma, R., Tunç, B., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The potential of infant fMRI research and the study of early life stress as a promising exemplar
Graham, A. M., Pfeifer, J. H., Fisher, P. A., Lin, W., Gao, W., & Fair, D. A. (2015) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.09.005 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationEnsemble learning with 3D convolutional neural networks for functional connectome-based prediction
Khosla, M., Jamison, K. W., Kuceyeski, A. F., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.012 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Harikumar, A., Evans, D. W., Dougherty, C. C., Carpenter, K. L. H., & Michael, A. M. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2020.0865 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Regional homogeneity changes in patients with primary insomnia
Wang, T., Li, S., Jiang, G., Lin, C., Li, M., Ma, X., Zhan, W., Jin, F., Li, L., Li, C., et al. (2015) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3960-4 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091322 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationQureshi, M. N. I., Min, B., Jo, H. J., & Lee, B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160697 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Developmental sex differences in resting state functional connectivity of amygdala sub-regions
Alarcón, G., Cservenka, A., Rudolph, M. D., Fair, D. A., & Nagel, B. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.013 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fair, D. A., Nigg, J. T., Iyer, S., Bathula, D., Mills, K. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Schlaggar, B. L., Mennes, M., Gutman, D., Bangaru, S., Buitelaar, J. K., Dickstein, D. P., Di Martino, A., Kennedy, D. N., Kelly, C., Luna, B., Schweitzer, J. B., Velanova, K., Wang, Y.-F., Mostofsky, S., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Indian Institute of Technology Ropar (IN)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Brown University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fair, Damien A.
- Milham, Michael P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 80-80
- ISSN
- 1662-5137 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3563110
- OpenAlex
- W2148334755
- Semantic Scholar
- 4a1e1056f60486684c36e5d5cc0c4d93e7824fb2
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 23
- FWCI
- 38.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (90DD0596)
- Autism Speaks
- Leon Levy Foundation (R01MH083246)
- Johns Hopkins University (RR025005)
- Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
- Children's Miracle Network Hospitals
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (175.010.200)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000128)
- Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (HD-24061)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080243, K23MH087770, K99MH091238, K01MH082123, R01MH083246, R01MH085328, R00MH091238, R01MH096773, R01MH078160, R01MH086654, R01MH083320, R01MH091068, R01MH081218, K22MH074945, R01MH067924)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA031257)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS053425)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025005, P41RR015241)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057076, P30HD024061, P30HD004147)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- ADHD subtypes, resting-state functional connectivity, motion artifacts, combined type ADHD, inattentive type ADHD, multivariate pattern analysis, graph theory, default mode network, insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, clinical heterogeneity, hyperkinetic disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review