Cited by 463Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data

Open access
Fair, Damien A., Nigg, Joel T., Iyer, Swathi, Bathula, Deepti, Mills, Kathryn L., Dosenbach, Nico U. F., Schlaggar, Bradley L., Mennes, Maarten +14 more·2013·Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing enthusiasm that functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could achieve clinical utility for a broad range of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, several barriers remain. For example, the acquisition of large-scale datasets capable of clarifying the marked heterogeneity that exists in psychiatric illnesses will need to be realized. In addition, there continues to be a need for the development of image processing and analysis methods capable of separating signal from artifact. As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, and movement-related artifact being a significant confound in functional imaging studies, ADHD offers a unique challenge. As part of the ADHD-200 Global Competition and this special edition of Frontiers, the ADHD-200 Consortium demonstrates the utility of an aggregate dataset pooled across five institutions in addressing these challenges. The work aimed to (1) examine the impact of emerging techniques for controlling for "micro-movements," and (2) provide novel insights into the neural correlates of ADHD subtypes. Using support vector machine (SVM)-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) we show that functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes. The application of graph-theory revealed that the Combined (ADHD-C) and Inattentive (ADHD-I) subtypes demonstrated some overlapping (particularly sensorimotor systems), but unique patterns of atypical connectivity. For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum. Systematic motion-related artifact was noted, and highlighted the need for stringent motion correction. Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed. These data suggest that resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) data can be used to characterize individual patients with ADHD and to identify neural distinctions underlying the clinical heterogeneity of ADHD.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Using the aggregated ADHD-200 resting-state fMRI dataset, this paper shows that stringent micro-movement correction is necessary and that functional connectivity patterns can differentiate ADHD Combined and Inattentive subtypes from each other and from typically developing controls. The two subtypes show overlapping sensorimotor atypicality but distinct connectivity signatures, with ADHD-C involving default-network/insular regions and ADHD-I involving dorsolateral prefrontal and cerebellar regions.

Key findings

  • In 455 typically developing children and 193 children with ADHD, SVM-based MVPA classified ADHD subtypes from controls above chance after conservative motion correction: Procedure 5 gave 77.0% accuracy for ADHD-C vs. TDC (75% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity) and 80.8% for ADHD-I vs. TDC (78.9% sensitivity, 82.7% specificity); Procedure 10 gave 71.2% for ADHD-C vs. TDC and 82.7% for ADHD-I vs. TDC.
  • Three-group classification (chance = 33%) reached 69.2% overall with Procedure 5, 56.4% with Procedure 8, and 68.6% with Procedure 10.
  • Traditional motion parameters showed a non-linear relationship with whole-brain BOLD change (DVARS), and frame-to-frame measures such as FD also remained non-linear; several correction procedures reduced the short- vs. long-range connectivity distinction, while age prediction remained possible (e.g., R² = 0.36 for Procedure 1, R² = 0.46 for Procedure 9).
  • Graph-theory node-strength analyses showed ADHD-C atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components and insular cortex, whereas ADHD-I showed atypical patterns in dorsolateral prefrontal regions and cerebellum; both subtypes showed sensorimotor system involvement.

Methods

  • Design: retrospective aggregation of ADHD-200 rs-fcMRI data from multiple institutions; participants were youth ages 7–14 years, comprising 455 typically developing controls and 193 subjects with DSM-IV-TR ADHD (ADHD-I N = 80; ADHD-C N = 112 in Table 1).
  • Imaging/analysis: 160 a priori ROIs, single-subject 160 × 160 correlation matrices, Fisher r-to-z transformation, FDR correction, SVM/SVR-based MVPA with leave-one-out cross-validation, and graph-theory node-strength visualization.
  • Motion handling: ten motion correction procedures were compared, including traditional regression, frame-to-frame covariates, mean FD covariate/matching, frame censoring (FD > 0.2 mm or DVARS > 4), and polynomial r-value correction; diagnostic comparisons used Procedures 5, 8, and 10 and controlled for site, gender, and IQ via multiple regression.

Limitations

  • The paper states that movement correction still has room for improvement; data were aggregated across sites without coordinated recruitment, diagnostic, or imaging protocols, so marked site-related variation exists.
  • The paper notes that ADHD diagnosis relies on strict symptom counts and DSM-IV, and that ADHD-I includes participants subthreshold for hyperactivity; it also cannot rule out that differences reflect the effort required to remain still in ADHD.
  • Evident from the text: frame-removal procedures reduce sample size/power, interpolation added more noise than simple removal, classification algorithms were not optimized, and the hyperactive-impulsive subtype was omitted due to its relative rarity in the age range studied.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00080

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed.

    “Findings reported were robust to the specific motion correction strategy employed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For ADHD-I, atypical patterns were exhibited within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.

    “For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes (ADHD-C and ADHD-I).

    “Using support vector machine (SVM)-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) we show that functional connectivity patterns in individuals are capable of differentiating the two most prominent ADHD subtypes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.
  • Findingown data

    For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex.

    “For ADHD-C, atypical connectivity was prominent in midline default network components, as well as insular cortex; in contrast, the ADHD-I group exhibited atypical patterns within the dlPFC regions and cerebellum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Systematic motion-related artifact was present in the data.

    “Systematic motion-related artifact was noted, and highlighted the need for stringent motion correction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 44
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    With mean FD as a covariate (Procedure 5), the ability to make age predictions rose slightly from the original estimate (Procedure 1) to R2 = 0.39.

    “Interestingly, while the short-long range effect was reduced, the ability to make age predictions in the data rose slightly from the original estimate (i.e. Procedure 1) with the movement correction procedures (R2 = 0.39).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Node strength analysis for Procedures 5, 8, and 10 reveals a distributed pattern of connectivity predictive of age, with several subcortical structures highly predictive; connections that get stronger with age are within networks, and those that get weaker are between networks.

    “The figure shows a distributed pattern of connectivity with several subcortical structures being highly predictive. Connections that tended to get stronger with age appeared to be within networks, and connections that got weaker with age were between networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Findings for Procedure 8 were consistent across individual sites.

    “[Note: findings were consistent across individual sites (Figure A2)].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adding frame-to-frame displacement (FDi) or frame-to-frame 6 motion parameters as covariates in partial correlation estimates only modestly alters the distinction between short- and long-range connections' relationships with age, while maintaining age prediction ability.

    “As can be observed in Figures A1 and 4, the distinction between short- and long-range connections in terms of their relationships with age was only modestly altered by these additional correction procedures, while the ability to make age predictions was maintained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In simulation, the distance between original and simulated correlation matrices is low when few frames are removed, but the tight relationship degrades as the fraction of frames removed approaches 1.

    “As can be seen, the distance is low when few frames are removed; however, the tight relationship degrades as the fraction of frames removed approaches 1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Combining volume censoring with mean FD matching (Procedure 8) reduces short- and long-range relationships but shows a slight decline in age classification ability (R2 = 0.34).

    “This combined method also reduces the short- and long-range relationships (Figures 2 and 4), but shows a slight decline in the ability to make age classifications in individuals (R2 = 0.34).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Volume censoring with FDi > 0.2 mm (Procedure 7) reduces but does not completely remove the distinction between short- and long-range connectivity in their relationships with age.

    “While age-relationships were not completely removed, we once again see a reduction in the distinction noted between short- and long-range connectivity (Figures 2 and 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    With subject matching based on mean FDi (Procedure 6), the ability to make age predictions increased to R2 = 0.42.

    “The ability to make age predictions increased (R2 = 0.42) (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In typically developing children, functional connections that become stronger with increasing age tend to link distant regions (long-range), while connections that become weaker with age are primarily between proximal regions (short-range).

    “we found that connections that became stronger with increasing age, or “grew-up,” tended to link distant regions (i.e., long-range connections). Connections that became weaker with increasing age, or “grew-down,” were primarily found between proximal regions (i.e., short-range connections) (see Figures 2 and 4; p < 0.0001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    With r-value correction using polynomial regression (Procedure 10), short- and long-range distinctions in age relationships were significantly reduced, while age prediction ability remained (R2 = 0.40).

    “As with the other procedures, the short- and long-range distinctions in terms of age were significantly reduced, yet the ability to make age predictions remained (R2 = 0.40; Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is a positive but non-linear relationship between frame-to-frame motion parameters (FD) and changes in the whole brain BOLD signal.

    “while the relationship of frame-to-frame motion parameters (i.e., FD) and changes in the whole brain signal is positive, there is still a non-linear relationship (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In typically developing children, SVR-based MVPA using rs-fcMRI provides robust age predictions, with Von Bertalanffy's growth curve model fitting brain maturity (R2 = 0.36).

    “We also saw robust age-predictions for the TDC group. Von Bertalanffy's growth curve model ([a•(1 − e−bx)]) provided a significant fit for predicting brain maturity (Figure 3A) (R2 = 0.36).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect of FD on DVARS is similar across all ages (no strongly discernible relationship between movement effect on BOLD and age).

    “Because there appears to be no strongly discernible relationships between the effect of movement on the BOLD signal and age (i.e., the effect of FD on DVARS is similar for all ages—Figure 5)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Regional brain contributions associated with age or ADHD status were not equally distributed throughout the cortex, with some regions having many connections that strongly correlated with age or differentiated TDC from ADHD subjects and others having few or none.

    “Regional brain contributions associated with age or ADHD status were not equally distributed throughout the cortex.”
    • Also stated in: § Visualizing regional brain contributions · plain
      “Some regions had many connections that strongly correlated with age (or differentiated TDC from ADHD subjects), while others had few or none.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nodes most strongly differentiating ADHD-C from TDC were distributed across the cortex, most prominent in medial prefrontal and posterior parietal nodes of the default network, with other atypical regions in sensorimotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular systems.

    “Nodes most strongly differentiating ADHD-C and TDC were distributed across the cortex (Figure 8), but were most prominent in the medial prefrontal and posterior parietal nodes of the default network. Other atypical regions included nodes of the sensorimotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Many developmental principles identified previously are still present even after stringent motion correction, while others are not.

    “Similar to a recent report (Satterthwaite et al., 2012), our findings show that many of the developmental principles identified previously are still present even after stringent motion correction, while others are not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Network configuration appears similar to that of adults, even in younger ages, though not identical.

    “Network configuration, while not identical, appears to be similar to that of adults, even in our younger ages, as shown in Figure A7 and in Power et al. (2012a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Power et al. (2012a)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Age-related growth curves were improved with several motion correction procedures, with the strongest age-related effects when using DVARS and matching as the surrogate measure for frame removal.

    “Age-related growth curves were improved with several of the motion correction procedures, with the strongest age-related effects occurring when using DVARS and matching as the surrogate measure for frame removal (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For ADHD-I, consensus features were largely distributed across systems including prominent sensorimotor features, similar to ADHD-C, but the patterns between subtypes were distinct.

    “Findings with regard to consensus features and ADHD-I were similar to those of ADHD-C in that they were largely distributed across systems including prominent features in the sensorimotor systems; however, the patterns between the subtypes were also quite distinct.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Procedures 8 and 10 revealed largely consistent findings with regard to overall patterns (Figure A4).

    “As can be seen in Figure A4, procedures 8 and 10 revealed largely consistent findings with regard to overall patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Findings for both ADHD subtypes were relatively distributed, with each affecting only a subset of regions in any one network.

    “Findings for both subtypes were relatively distributed, with each affecting only a subset of regions in any one network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Simulations suggest that correlation structure can be altered with frame removal, but the concern appears largest only after significant portions of frames are removed.

    “Our simulations suggest that the correlation structure can be altered with frame removal; however, the concern appears to be largest only after significant portions of the frames are removed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While both subtypes revealed largely distributed atypical connectivity, findings for ADHD-C were more prominent in the default network.

    “While both subtypes revealed largely distributed atypical connectivity, findings for the ADHD-C were more prominent in the default network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Age-related predictions are still possible and were even improved with motion correction procedures.

    “For example, age-related predictions are still possible and were even improved with motion correction procedures (Dosenbach et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dosenbach et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Both populations showed atypical nodes in primary sensorimotor systems, supporting previous work implicating this system in ADHD.

    “Both populations showed atypical nodes in primary sensorimotor systems, supporting previous work implicating this system in ADHD (Mostofsky et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mostofsky et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Despite potential differences across centers, there are brain features related to the presence of ADHD and ADHD subtype that are robust to this variation.

    “Our findings suggest that despite potential differences across centers, there are brain features related to the presence of ADHD and ADHD subtype that are robust to this variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Abrupt head displacement typically manifests as signal loss in echo-planar imaging.

    “This measure is based on the fact that abrupt head displacement typically manifests as signal loss in echo-planar imaging (Smyser et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smyser et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The modules used to categorize regions had a high quality index (Q) and were the most resistant to perturbation by randomization, measured by variation of information (VOI).

    “The modules (i.e., communities) used to categorize regions had a high quality index (Q) and were the most resistant to perturbation by randomization, measured by variation of information (VOI) (Karrer et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karrer et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    These preprocessing steps are thought to reduce spurious variance unlikely to reflect neuronal activity.

    “These preprocessing steps are thought to reduce spurious variance unlikely to reflect neuronal activity (Fox and Raichle, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fox and Raichle, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Motion can artificially produce or obscure ADHD-related differences in rs-fcMRI metrics.

    “As a prototypical hyperkinetic disorder, ADHD presents exceptional challenges for fMRI-based research, due to importance of addressing the increased prevalence of motion in this population, which can artificially produce or obscure ADHD-related differences in rs-fcMRI metrics (Power et al., 2012a; Satterthwaite et al., 2012; Van Dijk et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Power et al., 2012a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Satterthwaite et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van Dijk et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    rs-fcMRI results are remarkably reliable across imaging centers.

    “and rs-fcMRI results are remarkably reliable across imaging centers (Biswal et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biswal et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Subsample size was matched to avoid biasing the classifier group.

    “To avoid biasing our classifier group, subsample size was matched (see Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    rs-fcMRI yields consistent results across subjects, scans, and days.

    “it yields consistent results across subjects, scans, and days (van de Ven et al., 2004; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Shehzad et al., 2009; Van Dijk et al., 2010),”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites van de Ven et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Damoiseaux et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shehzad et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Replacing traditional movement parameters with frame-to-frame motion parameters in linear regression preprocessing will assist but likely not fully account for movement artifact.

    “These data suggest that simply replacing traditional movement parameters with frame-to-frame motion parameters in traditional preprocessing steps (i.e., linear regression) will assist, but likely not fully account for potential movement artifact.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The continued association between age and mean FD after volume censoring is likely due to a small increase in movement in younger subjects for remaining frames and a small relationship between DVARS and FD even under the 0.2 mm cutoff.

    “This observation is likely due to a small increase in movement in younger subjects for the remaining frames and what can be observed as a small relationship of frame-to-frame changes in BOLD (i.e., DVARS) and FD even under this 0.2 mm cutoff (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Spontaneous neural activity is associated with correlated low-frequency (<~0.1 Hz) BOLD signal fluctuations in functionally related brain regions at rest.

    “rs-fcMRI is based on the discovery that spontaneous neural activity (Biswal et al., 1995; Leopold et al., 2003; Nir et al., 2006; Scholvinck et al., 2010) is associated with correlated low-frequency (<~0.1 Hz) blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in functionally related brain regions at rest (Biswal et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Biswal et al., 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Leopold et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nir et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Frame-to-frame changes in signal intensity related to movement are significantly greater than those caused by neurophysiologic changes in the BOLD signal.

    “Because frame-to-frame changes in signal intensity related to movement are significantly greater than those caused by neurophysiologic changes in the BOLD signal, this measure provides a natural parameter with which to directly examine the relationship of movement measurements and the BOLD response (Smyser et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smyser et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    rs-fcMRI can be used during sleep as well as during sedation.

    “Importantly, rs-fcMRI can be used during sleep as well as during sedation (Fukunaga et al., 2006, 2008; Vincent et al., 2007; Greicius, 2008; Horovitz et al., 2008);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fukunaga et al., 2006, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vincent et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greicius, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    As data for this investigation were aggregated retrospectively, slightly different ADHD assessment protocols were used across institutions.

    “As data for this investigation were aggregated retrospectively (as a large collaborative effort), slightly different ADHD assessment protocols were used across institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The large sample size in this study afforded the ability to examine conservative motion correction approaches, but other samples may not support the same opportunity.

    “The large sample size here afforded us the ability to examine these conservative approaches, but other samples may not support the same opportunity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These approaches perform respectably for reducing artifact induced by changes in head position, but more robust procedures are likely to emerge.

    “It should be emphasized, however, that while these approaches appear to perform respectably for reducing artifact induced by changes in head position, work in this area is currently ongoing and even more robust procedures are likely to emerge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent theories suggest the default network is associated with remembering the past, as well as planning for, and anticipating future events.

    “Recent theories suggest the default network is associated with remembering the past, as well as planning for, and anticipating future events (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Buckner et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buckner and Carroll, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buckner et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The fronto-parietal network is believed to be an important system for task level control.

    “The fronto-parietal network is believed to be an important system for task level control (Dosenbach et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dosenbach et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Children with ADHD show increased variability during performance of simple motor skills and during motor adaptation.

    “Furthermore, in parallel with numerous recent studies showing ADHD-associated increases in intrasubject response time variability (Castellanos et al., 2005; Vaurio et al., 2009; Epstein et al., 2011), children with ADHD show increased variability during performance of simple motor skills and during motor adaptation (Izawa et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Izawa et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our findings demonstrate the potential utility of functional MRI approaches in characterizing clinical heterogeneity in ADHD, which should be similarly useful with other psychiatric disorders.

    “In summary, our findings demonstrate the potential utility of functional MRI approaches in characterizing clinical heterogeneity in ADHD, which should be similarly useful with other psychiatric disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior.

    “To that end, recent studies of motor cortex physiology using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) and that lower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior (Gilbert et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gilbert et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies of gray matter thickness and connectivity measurements have shown that many of the same regions correspond to various forms of impulsivity measures.

    “Studies of gray matter thickness (Shaw et al., 2007) and connectivity measurements (Shannon et al., 2011) have shown that many of these same regions correspond to various forms of impulsivity measures, supporting this claim.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shaw et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shannon et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While significant changes occur throughout development, the general network structure appears intact at early ages.

    “Thus, while significant changes do occur throughout development, the general network structure appears to be intact at early ages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Changes in short- and long-range connectivity remain but are significantly reduced after motion correction procedures, indicating that the distance between connections that get weaker with age and those that get stronger overlap more than previously appreciated.

    “However, while the changes in short- and long-range connectivity appear to remain, this phenomena is significantly reduced after motion correction procedures (and becomes only weakly significant for some procedures)—highlighting that the distance between those connections that get weaker with age and those that get stronger overlap more than was previously appreciated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent studies of motor cortex physiology using TMS reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI).

    “To that end, recent studies of motor cortex physiology using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) reveal that subjects with ADHD show reduced Short Interval Cortical Inhibition (SICI) and that lower SICI is robustly correlated with parent ratings of more severe hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive behavior (Gilbert et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gilbert et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Impairments in incentive salience, motivation, and reward processing are increasingly appreciated in ADHD.

    “In particular, impairments in incentive salience, motivation, and reward processing are increasingly appreciated in ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sagvolden et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Musser et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nigg and Casey (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Children with ADHD often demonstrate difficulties with motor control, paralleling difficulties with higher-order executive control.

    “Children with ADHD often demonstrate difficulties with motor control, paralleling difficulties with higher-order executive control (Pennington and Ozonoff, 1996; Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pennington and Ozonoff, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mostofsky et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These findings for ADHD-C are consistent with a growing body of studies implicating the default network in ADHD.

    “These findings for ADHD-C are consistent with a growing body of studies implicating the default network in ADHD (Castellanos et al., 2008; Fassbender et al., 2009; Fair et al., 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Castellanos et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fassbender et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fair et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A consistent characteristic of children with ADHD is that they fail to meet age-norms on timed repetitive and sequential movements and manifest a greater amount of motor overflow than age-matched controls.

    “A consistent characteristic of children with ADHD is that they fail to meet age-norms on timed repetitive and sequential movements and manifest a greater amount of motor overflow than age-matched controls (Denckla and Rudel, 1978; Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Denckla and Rudel, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mostofsky et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both overflow and variability in motor execution have been found to be related to ADHD-associated impairments at the behavioral level.

    “Both overflow and variability in motor execution have been found to be related to ADHD-associated impairments at the behavioral level (Mostofsky et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mostofsky et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The dorsolateral prefrontal and cerebellar nodes have been empirically linked to fronto-parietal systems by community detection methods.

    “These particular nodes (see Figure A6) have been empirically linked with community detection methods to fronto-parietal systems (black/yellow) (Dosenbach et al., 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dosenbach et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    These data highlight the need to take careful consideration of movement-related artifact in all connectivity studies, particularly during classification of clinical samples.

    “Most importantly, however, these data in aggregate highlight the need to take careful consideration of movement related artifact in all connectivity studies, particularly during classification of clinical samples as noted below.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Procedure 10 cannot completely resolve the issues of frame removal; it still relies on a valid estimate of the correlation structure after removing frames and requires participant removal when a high degree of motion is present.

    “The results were promising, but the method is not able to completely resolve the issues noted by frame removal. The method still relies on a valid estimate of the correlation structure after removing frames, and thus still requires participant removal when a high degree of motion is present.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Several motion correction methods appeared relatively robust at controlling for motion artifact in the BOLD signal, and all reduced the distinction between short- and long-range connections in their relationships with age.

    “we found several methods that appeared relatively robust at controlling for motion artifact in the BOLD signal. All of these additional approaches reduced the distinction between short- and long-range connections in terms of their relationships with age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Frame-to-frame measurements (FD) also share a non-linear relationship with the BOLD signal, so simple linear regression of these measurements provides only limited improvement for motion artifacts.

    “while frame-to-frame measurements (i.e., FD), appear to be superior with relation to the assumption of linearity, they too share a non-linear relationship with the BOLD signal. Thus, simple linear regression of these measurements from the BOLD signal also provides only limited improvement with regard to motion artifacts (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Frame removal approaches reduce sample size due to matching or effectively removing subjects, thus reducing statistical power.

    “In particular, the approaches reduce sample size due to “matching” (i.e., subject exclusion) or, effectively removing subjects due to the high percentage of frames removed. Thus, statistical power is reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This work does not consider the possibility that the differences noted here could be unique to the effort required to remain still in the ADHD population.

    “Last, we mention that this work does not consider the possibility that the differences noted here could be unique to the effort required to remain still in the ADHD population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These results suggest that ADHD-I has distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in control systems, which may underlie the prominent inattentive symptoms in this population.

    “Taken together, these results suggest that ADHD-I has distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in control systems, which may underlie the prominent inattentive symptoms in this population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    While the study's movement correction procedures were carefully considered, there is still room for improvement in controlling for the movement confound.

    “Notably, while our movement correction procedures were carefully considered, there is still room for improvement in controlling for this confound.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ADHD-C also shows distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in systems such as the default network, which may mark for an inability to exert top-down attentional control-perhaps in the context of an inability to integrate contextual information supported by default mode processing.

    “ADHD-C also shows distributed atypical connectivity, with prominent findings in systems such as the default network, which may mark for an inability to exert top-down attentional control—perhaps in the context of an inability to integrate contextual information supported by default mode processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings point to potential distinct connectivity patterns underlying ADHD subtypes, but also emphasize the vast heterogeneity in these populations.

    “These findings point to potential distinct connectivity patterns underlying ADHD subtypes, but also emphasizes the vast heterogeneity in these populations, which will need to be considered in future clinical investigations of ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The findings presented here highlight the translational potential of rs-fcMRI for developmental neuropsychiatric disorders in general by demonstrating the ability of SVM-based MVPA to classify individuals with the disorder using rs-fcMRI.

    “Beyond a simple characterization of the neural signatures of ADHD subtypes, the findings presented here highlight the translational potential of rs-fcMRI for developmental neuropsychiatric disorders in general by demonstrating the ability of SVM-based MVPA to classify individuals with the disorder using the rs-fcMRI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
67 of 67
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hyperactive-impulsive subtype is relatively rare in the age ranges studied.

    “we omit the hyperactive-impulsive subtype due to its relative rarity in the age ranges studied”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.

    “given the growing consensus that the neural correlates of ADHD are distributed in nature, rather than being explained by abnormalities in any specific connection or region.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Imaging studies have generally ignored distinctions among ADHD subtypes.

    “imaging studies have generally ignored these distinctions.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.

    “Using mean FD as a covariate (i.e., Procedure 5) with age assumes that movement affects the BOLD signal similarly for any age group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The correlation matrix calculated from subjects with little to no movement represents the true correlation structure.

    “For each of these subjects we than calculated their correlation matrix across the 160 ROIs, which served as our baseline (i.e., the true correlation structure).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention.

    “Given that ADHD-I subtype symptoms are predominantly those of inattention”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ADHD relies on strict symptom counts and the DSM-IV system for identifying ADHD-I includes participants who are subthreshold for hyperactivity.

    “We note that ADHD relies on strict symptom counts and the DSM-IV system for identifying ADHD-I includes participants who are subthreshold for hyperactivity.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Stated age range excludes a reported site mean

    Major

    The Methods section limits participants to ages 7-14, but Table 1 reports a mean age of 16.09 for the 82 WashU controls. A group entirely within the stated range cannot have that mean.

  • ADHD-I total mean age disagrees with site means

    Minor

    Weighting the five reported ADHD-I site mean ages by their respective sample sizes gives 11.4065 years, or 11.41 to two decimal places, rather than the total-row value of 11.45. Rounding of the site means cannot account for the difference.

  • Procedure 6 age-movement p-value differs between text and figure caption

    Minor

    The text reports p = 0.63 for the relationship between mean FD and age after Procedure 6 matching, whereas the Figure 5 caption reports p = 0.62 for that same relationship.

  • Pooled dataset is described as coming from five institutions, but six are listed

    Minor

    The paper says the aggregate dataset was pooled across five institutions, but its Methods section names six institutions contributing data.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Conners C. K. (2008). Conners 3rd Edition Manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fair, D. A., Nigg, J. T., Iyer, S., Bathula, D., Mills, K. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Schlaggar, B. L., Mennes, M., Gutman, D., Bangaru, S., Buitelaar, J. K., Dickstein, D. P., Di Martino, A., Kennedy, D. N., Kelly, C., Luna, B., Schweitzer, J. B., Velanova, K., Wang, Y.-F., Mostofsky, S., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Ropar (IN)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fair, Damien A.
  • Milham, Michael P.
Venue
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
6
Pages
80-80
ISSN
1662-5137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148334755
Cited by
463
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 23
FWCI
38.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (90DD0596)
  • Autism Speaks
  • Leon Levy Foundation (R01MH083246)
  • Johns Hopkins University (RR025005)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • Children's Miracle Network Hospitals
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (175.010.200)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000128)
  • Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute
  • Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (HD-24061)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080243, K23MH087770, K99MH091238, K01MH082123, R01MH083246, R01MH085328, R00MH091238, R01MH096773, R01MH078160, R01MH086654, R01MH083320, R01MH091068, R01MH081218, K22MH074945, R01MH067924)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA031257)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS053425)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025005, P41RR015241)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057076, P30HD024061, P30HD004147)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
ADHD subtypes, resting-state functional connectivity, motion artifacts, combined type ADHD, inattentive type ADHD, multivariate pattern analysis, graph theory, default mode network, insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, clinical heterogeneity, hyperkinetic disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review