Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apoptosis as a mechanism of neuronal cell death following acute experimental spinal cord injury

Lou, J, Lenke, L G, Ludwig, F J, O'Brien, M F·1998·Spinal Cord

Abstract

The complex biochemical interactions following acute spinal cord injury have undergone considerable investigation recently. Progress has been made in discovering both primary and secondary injury cascades that combine to produce the ultimate neurologic insult. Traditionally, neuronal and supporting cell death following spinal cord injury have focused on necrotic death pathways resulting passively from the actual mechanical tissue damage and inflammatory processes which follow. However, the occurrence of programmed apoptotic cell death which is an actively mediated cellular process may occur following acute spinal cord injury and, if present, may play a role in the ultimate neurologic insult. In this study, we document a chronologically-specific course of apoptotic cell death by the TUNEL assay technique following an acute experimental spinal cord injury in the rat model. In this manner, apoptotic cell death following acute spinal cord injury may play a pivotal role in the secondary injury cascade which produces the ultimate neurologic insult and may allow potential for mediating neuronal survival via anti-apoptotic factors such as the protooncogene Bcl-2.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.sc.3100632

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 108

Metadata

Authors
Lou, J., Lenke, L. G., Ludwig, F. J., & O'Brien, M. F.
Venue
Spinal Cord
Published
1998-06-30
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
683-690
ISSN
  • 1362-4393
  • 1476-5624
Cited by
108
References
21
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.