The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Virtual Microscopy Images: A Minimum-Model Approach
Open accessAbstract
Automated image analysis of cells and tissues has been an active research field in medical informatics for decades but has recently attracted increased attention due to developments in computer and microscopy hardware and the awareness that scientific and diagnostic pathology require novel approaches to perform objective quantitative analyses of cellular and tissue specimens. Model-based approaches use a priori information on cell shape features to obtain the segmentation, which may introduce a bias favouring the detection of cell nuclei only with certain properties. In this study we present a novel contour-based "minimum-model" cell detection and segmentation approach that uses minimal a priori information and detects contours independent of their shape. This approach avoids a segmentation bias with respect to shape features and allows for an accurate segmentation (precision = 0.908; recall = 0.859; validation based on ∼8000 manually-labeled cells) of a broad spectrum of normal and disease-related morphological features without the requirement of prior training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Histopathology Images
Al-Kofahi, Y., Lassoued, W., Lee, W., & Roysam, B. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2035102 · Cited by 681
Cited by
Nuclei Segmentation with Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Networks based U-Net (R2U-Net)
Alom, M. Z., Yakopcic, C., Taha, T. M., & Asari, V. K. (2018) · NAECON 2018 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference · doi:10.1109/naecon.2018.8556686 · Cited by 1,020
Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 Data Science Bowl
Caicedo, J. C., Goodman, A., Karhohs, K. W., Cimini, B. A., Ackerman, J., Haghighi, M., Heng, C., Becker, T., Doan, M., McQuin, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0612-7 · Cited by 809
Explosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms
Turnbull, L., Toyofuku, M., Hynen, A. L., Kurosawa, M., Pessi, G., Petty, N. K., Osvath, S. R., Cárcamo-Oyarce, G., Gloag, E. S., Shimoni, R., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11220 · Cited by 709
Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Analysis: A Review
Veta, M., Pluim, J. P. W., van Diest, P. J., & Viergever, M. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2303852 · Cited by 696
A Multi-Organ Nucleus Segmentation Challenge
Kumar, N., Verma, R., Anand, D., Zhou, Y., Onder, O. F., Tsougenis, E., Chen, H., Heng, P.-A., Li, J., Hu, Z., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2947628 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Wienert, S., Heim, D., Saeger, K., Stenzinger, A., Beil, M., Hufnagl, P., Dietel, M., Denkert, C., & Klauschen, F.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2012-07-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 503-503
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043034051
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Virtual Microscopy Images: A Minimum-Model Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep00503
- The paper
- Wienert, S., Heim, D., Saeger, K., Stenzinger, A., Beil, M., Hufnagl, P., Dietel, M., Denkert, C., & Klauschen, F. (2012). Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Virtual Microscopy Images: A Minimum-Model Approach. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.