CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State tomography via weak measurements

Wu, Shengjun·2013·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/srep01193PMC PMC3562073
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep01193

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 (a) Compatible aspects are combined in classical physics, (b) while complementary aspects are combined in quantum physics.
Figure 1 (a) Compatible aspects are combined in classical physics, (b) while complementary aspects are combined in quantum physics.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2 (a) A strong measurement only reveals a certain aspect of the quantum state, (b) while a weak measurement enables us to perceive (measure) incompatible aspects of the quantum state simultaneously.
Figure 2 (a) A strong measurement only reveals a certain aspect of the quantum state, (b) while a weak measurement enables us to perceive (measure) incompatible aspects of the quantum state simultaneously.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Bohr, N. The quantum postulate and the recent developments of atomic theory. Naturwissenschaften 16, 245–257 (1928). · DOI
  2. Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z. & Vaidman, L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351–1354 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kocsis, S., et al. Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer. Science 332, 1170–1173 (2011). · DOI
  4. Lundeen, J. S., Sutherland, B., Patel, A., Stewart, C. & Bamber, C. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature 474, 188–191 (2011). · DOI
  5. Ritchie, N. W. M., Story, J. G. & Hulet, R. G. Realization of a measurement of a weak value. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107–1110 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pryde, G. J., O'Brien, J. L., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Wiseman, H. M. Measurement of quantum weak values of photon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220405 (2005). · DOI
  7. Hosten, O. & Kwiat, P. Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 319, 787 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Aharonov, Y., Botero, A., Popescu, S., Reznik, B. & Tollaksen, J. Revisiting Hardy's paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values. Phys. Lett. A 301, 130 (2002). · DOI
  9. Wiseman, H. M. Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and bayesianism. New J. Phys. 9, 165 (2007). · DOI
  10. Mir, R., Lundeen, J. S., Mitchell, M. W., Steinberg, A. M., Garretson, J. L. & Wiseman, H. M. A double-slit ‘which way’ experiment on the complementarity-uncertainty debate. New J. Phys. 9, 287 (2007). · DOI
  11. Williams, N. S. & Jordan, A. N. Weak values and the Leggett-Garg inequality in solid-state qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 026804 (2008). · DOI
  12. Johansen, L. M. Weak Measurements with Arbitrary Probe States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120402 (2004). · DOI
  13. Hosten, O. & Kwiat, P. Observation of the spin hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 319, 787 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dixon, P. B., Starling, D. J., Jordan, A. N. & Howell, J. C. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173601 (2009). · DOI
  15. Starling, D. J., Dixon, P. B., Jordan, A. N. & Howell, J. C. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values. Phys. Rev. A 80, 041803(R) (2009). · DOI
  16. Brunner, N. & Simon, C. Measuring Small Longitudinal Phase Shifts: Weak Measurements or Standard Interferometry? Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010405 (2010). · DOI
  17. Zilberberg, O., Romito, A. & Gefen, Y. Charge sensing amplification via weak values measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080405 (2011). · DOI
  18. Feizpour, A., Xing, X. & Steinberg, A. M. Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133603 (2011). · DOI
  19. Agarwal, G. S. & Pathak, P. K. Realization of quantum-mechanical weak values of observables using entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032108 (2007). · DOI
  20. Wu, S. & Żukowski, M. Feasible optical weak measurements of complementary observables via a single Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 080403 (2012). · DOI
  21. Jozsa, R. Complex weak values in quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007). · DOI
  22. Duck, I. M., Stevenson, P. M. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. The sense in which a ”weak measurement” of a spin-1/2 particle's spin component yields a value 100. Phys. Rev. D 40, 2112 (1989). · DOI
  23. Starling, D. J., Dixon, P. B., Williams, N. S., Jordan, A. N. & Howell, J. C. Continuous phase amplification with a Sagnac interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 82, 011802(R) (2010). · DOI
  24. Geszti, T. Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value. Phys. Rev. A 81, 044102 (2010). · DOI
  25. Wiseman, H. M. Weak values, quantum trajectories and the cavity-QED experiment on wave-particle correlation. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032111 (2002). · DOI
  26. Wu, S. & Mølmer, K. Weak measurements with a qubit meter. Phys. Lett. A 374, 34 (2009). · DOI
  27. Wu, S. & Li Y. Weak measurements beyond the Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman formalism. Phys. Rev. A 83, 052106 (2011). · DOI
  28. Zhu, X. et al. Quantum measurements with preselection and postselection. Phys. Rev. A 84, 052111 (2011). · DOI
  29. Nakamura, K., Nishizawa, A. & Fujimoto, M.-K. Evaluation of weak measurements to all orders. Phys. Rev. A 85, 012113 (2012). · DOI
  30. Pang, S., Wu, S. & Chen, Z.-B. Weak measurement with orthogonal preselection and postselection. Phys. Rev. A 86, 022112 (2012). · DOI
  31. Kofman, A. G., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Nonperturbative theory of weak pre- and post-selected measurements. Phys. Rep. 520, 43–133 (2012). · DOI
  32. Dressel, J., Agarwal, S. & Jordan, A. N. Contextual values of observables in quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 240401 (2010). · DOI
  33. Kedem, Y. & Vaidman, L. Modular values and weak values of quantum observables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230401 (2010). · DOI
  34. Lundeen, J. S. & Bamber, C. Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070402 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Johansen, L. M. Quantum theory of successive projective measurements. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012119 (2007). · DOI
  36. Hofmann, H. F. Complex joint probabilities as expressions of reversible transformations in quantum mechanics. New J. Phys. 14, 043031 (2012). · DOI
  37. Resch, K. J. Amplifying a tiny optical effect. Science 319, 733 (2008). · DOI
  38. Aharonov, Y., Popescu, S. & Tollaksen, J. A time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics. Phys. Today 63, 27 (2010). · DOI
  39. Salvail, J. Z. et al. Full characterisation of polarisation states of light via direct measurement. ArXiv:1206.2618 [quant-ph]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, S.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-02-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/srep01193
PMC
PMC3562073
Cited by
84
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review