The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing Mechanical Strength of Gelatin Hydrogels by Divalent Metal Ion Removal
Open accessAbstract
The usage of gelatin hydrogel is limited due to its instability and poor mechanical properties, especially under physiological conditions. Divalent metal ions present in gelatin such as Ca 2+ and Fe 2+ play important roles in the gelatin molecule interactions. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of divalent ion removal on the stability and mechanical properties of gelatin gels with and without chemical crosslinking. The gelatin solution was purified by Chelex resin to replace divalent metal ions with sodium ions. The gel was then chemically crosslinked by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC). Results showed that the removal of divalent metal ions significantly impacted the formation of the gelatin network. The purified gelatin hydrogels had less interactions between gelatin molecules and form larger-pore network which enabled EDC to penetrate and crosslink the gel more efficiently. The crosslinked purified gels showed small swelling ratio, higher crosslinking density and dramatically increased storage and loss moduli. The removal of divalent ions is a simple yet effective method that can significantly improve the stability and strength of gelatin hydrogels. The in vitro cell culture demonstrated that the purified gelatin maintained its ability to support cell attachment and spreading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fabrication and Characterization of a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Nanofibrous Gelatin Matrix
Vogt, C., Xing, Q., He, W., Li, B., Frost, M. C., & Zhao, F. (2013) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm301984w · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Cited by
Li, H., Han, C., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Zhu, M., Pei, Z., Xue, Q., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Tang, Z., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee03232c · Cited by 931
Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink
Jia, W., Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S., Zhang, Y. S., Yue, K., Zhu, K., Liu, W., Pi, Q., Byambaa, B., Dokmeci, M. R., Shin, S. R., et al. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038 · Cited by 922
Polymeric hydrogel systems as emerging biomaterial platforms to enable hemostasis and wound healing
Pourshahrestani, S., Zeimaran, E., Kadri, N. A., Mutlu, N., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000905 · Cited by 448
Recent Advances in Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
Choi, J. R., Yong, K. W., Choi, J. Y., & Cowie, A. C. (2019) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/btn-2018-0083 · Cited by 403
Recent trends in protein and peptide-based biomaterials for advanced drug delivery
Varanko, A., Saha, S., & Chilkoti, A. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.08.008 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Xing, Q., Yates, K., Vogt, C., Qian, Z., Frost, M. C., & Zhao, F.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2014-04-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4706-4706
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966315709
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.