Toxicological and biochemical analyses demonstrate no toxic effect of Cry1C and Cry2A to Folsomia candida
Open accessAbstract
Collembolans are common soil arthropods that may be exposed to insecticidal proteins produced in genetically engineered (GE) plants by ingestion of crop residues or root exudates. In the present study, a dietary exposure assay was validated and used to assess the lethal and sublethal effects of two Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt) insecticidal proteins, Cry1C and Cry2A, on Folsomia candida. Using the insecticidal compounds potassium arsenate (PA), protease inhibitor (E-64) and Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) mixed into Baker’s yeast, we show that the assay used can detect adverse effects on F. candida. Survival and development were significantly reduced when F. candida was fed a diet containing PA, E-64 and GNA at 9, 75 and 100 μg/g diet, respectively, but not when fed a diet containing 300 μg/g Cry1C or 600 μg/g Cry2A. The activities of test antioxidant-, detoxification- and digestion-related enzymes in F. candida were unaltered by a diet containing 300 μg/g Cry1C or 600 μg/g Cry2A, but were significantly increased by a diet containing 75 μg/g E-64. The results confirm that Cry1C and Cry2A are not toxic to F. candida at concentrations that are much higher than those encountered under field conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Extrapolating non-target risk of <i>Bt</i> crops from laboratory to field
Duan, J. J., Lundgren, J. G., Naranjo, S., & Marvier, M. (2010) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0612 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of Bt crops on soil invertebrates: a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis
Krogh, P. H., Kostov, K., & Damgaard, C. F. (2020) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-020-00213-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Chen, X., Cheng, L., Cao, F., Romeis, J., Li, Y., & Peng, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hainan University (CN)
- Institute of Plant Protection (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Yunhe
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-10-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15619-15619
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4616050
- OpenAlex
- W2180652394
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- Folsomia candida, Cry1C, Cry2A, genetically modified crops, sublethal effects, antioxidant enzymes, detoxification enzymes, digestive enzymes, Galanthus nivalis agglutinin, potassium arsenate, soil arthropods, root exudates
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Bacterial Toxins, Protein Precursors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review