Cited by 102Genomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

In silico functional dissection of saturation mutagenesis: Interpreting the relationship between phenotypes and changes in protein stability, interactions and activity

Open access
Pires, Douglas E. V., Chen, Jing, Blundell, Tom L., Ascher, David B.·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Despite interest in associating polymorphisms with clinical or experimental phenotypes, functional interpretation of mutation data has lagged behind generation of data from modern high-throughput techniques and the accurate prediction of the molecular impact of a mutation remains a non-trivial task. We present here an integrated knowledge-driven computational workflow designed to evaluate the effects of experimental and disease missense mutations on protein structure and interactions. We exemplify its application with analyses of saturation mutagenesis of DBR1 and Gal4 and show that the experimental phenotypes for over 80% of the mutations correlate well with predicted effects of mutations on protein stability and RNA binding affinity. We also show that analysis of mutations in VHL using our workflow provides valuable insights into the effects of mutations, and their links to the risk of developing renal carcinoma. Taken together the analyses of the three examples demonstrate that structural bioinformatics tools, when applied in a systematic, integrated way, can rapidly analyse a given system to provide a powerful approach for predicting structural and functional effects of thousands of mutations in order to reveal molecular mechanisms leading to a phenotype. Missense or non-synonymous mutations are nucleotide substitutions that alter the amino acid sequence of a protein. Their effects can range from modifying transcription, translation, processing and splicing, localization, changing stability of the protein, altering its dynamics or interactions with other proteins, nucleic acids and ligands, including small molecules and metal ions. The advent of high-throughput techniques including sequencing and saturation mutagenesis has provided large amounts of phenotypic data linked to mutations. However, one of the hurdles has been understanding and quantifying the effects of a particular mutation, and how they translate into a given phenotype. One approach to overcome this is to use robust, accurate and scalable computational methods to understand and correlate structural effects of mutations with disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep19848

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The graph-based signatures concept has proven to be a powerful approach and has been widely applied to the study of protein structure, including how mutations alter protein stability, dynamics and interactions with other molecules.

    “Our previously described graph-based signatures concept has proven to be a powerful approach and has been widely applied to the study of protein structure, including how mutations alter protein stability (20,26), dynamics (27) and interactions with other molecules (20,28–34).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ascher D. et al. In Multifaceted Roles of Crystallography in Modern Drug Discovery (eds Scapin G., Patel D., Arnold E.). Ch. 12, 141– 163 (Springer, Netherlands, 2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pires, D. E. V., Chen, J., Blundell, T. L., & Ascher, D. B.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Pires, Douglas E. V.
  • Ascher, David B.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-01-22
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
19848-19848
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2418388116
Cited by
102
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arca - Repositório Institucional da Fiocruz (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Research Councils UK
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
  • Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N501864/1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1072476)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
saturation mutagenesis, missense mutations, non-synonymous mutations, protein stability, RNA binding affinity, protein-protein interaction, DBR1, GAL4, VHL, renal carcinoma, mutation effect prediction
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Computer Simulation, DNA, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA-Binding Proteins, von Hippel-Lindau Disease, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Mutation, Phenotype, Protein Binding, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, RNA Nucleotidyltransferases, Transcription Factors, Mutagenesis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Protein Stability, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review