The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The gut microbiome and degradation enzyme activity of wild freshwater fishes influenced by their trophic levels
Open accessAbstract
Vertebrate gut microbiome often underpins the metabolic capability and provides many beneficial effects on their hosts. However, little was known about how host trophic level influences fish gut microbiota and metabolic activity. In this study, more than 985,000 quality-filtered sequences from 24 16S rRNA libraries were obtained and the results revealed distinct compositions and diversities of gut microbiota in four trophic categories. PCoA test showed that gut bacterial communities of carnivorous and herbivorous fishes formed distinctly different clusters in PCoA space. Although fish in different trophic levels shared a large size of OTUs comprising a core microbiota community, at the genus level a strong distinction existed. Cellulose-degrading bacteria Clostridium, Citrobacter and Leptotrichia were dominant in the herbivorous, while Cetobacterium and protease-producing bacteria Halomonas were dominant in the carnivorous. PICRUSt predictions of metagenome function revealed that fishes in different trophic levels affected the metabolic capacity of their gut microbiota. Moreover, cellulase and amylase activities in herbivorous fishes were significantly higher than in the carnivorous, while trypsin activity in the carnivorous was much higher than in the herbivorous. These results indicated that host trophic level influenced the structure and composition of gut microbiota, metabolic capacity and gut content enzyme activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar
Miller, G. L. (1959) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60147a030 · Cited by 28,963
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
David, L. A., Maurice, C. F., Carmody, R. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Button, J. E., Wolfe, B. E., Ling, A. V., Devlin, A. S., Varma, Y., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12820 · Cited by 10,100
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
The Intestinal Microbiota Modulates the Anticancer Immune Effects of Cyclophosphamide
Viaud, S., Saccheri, F., Mignot, G., Yamazaki, T., Daillère, R., Hannani, D., Enot, D. P., Pfirschke, C., Engblom, C., Pittet, M. J., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240537 · Cited by 2,050
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome
Li, R., Fan, W., Tian, G., Zhu, H., He, L., Cai, J., Huang, Q., Cai, Q., Li, B., Bai, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08696 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citationSite and Strain-Specific Variation in Gut Microbiota Profiles and Metabolism in Experimental Mice
Friswell, M. K., Gika, H., Stratford, I. J., Theodoridis, G., Telfer, B., Wilson, I. D., & McBain, A. J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008584 · Cited by 207
Cited by
The advancement of probiotics research and its application in fish farming industries
Banerjee, G., & Ray, A. K. (2017) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.01.016 · Cited by 334
Legrand, T. P. R. A., Wynne, J. W., Weyrich, L. S., & Oxley, A. P. A. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12375 · Cited by 265
Fish Gut Microbiome: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives
Talwar, C., Nagar, S., Lal, R., & Negi, R. K. (2018) · Indian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s12088-018-0760-y · Cited by 257
Microbial embryonal colonization during pipefish male pregnancy
Beemelmanns, A., Poirier, M., Bayer, T., Kuenzel, S., & Roth, O. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37026-3 · Cited by 78
Sun, F., & Xu, Z. (2021) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse9020104 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Guo, X., Gooneratne, R., Lai, R., Zeng, C., Zhan, F., & Wang, W.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24340-24340
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2337502624
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The gut microbiome and degradation enzyme activity of wild freshwater fishes influenced by their trophic levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep24340
- The paper
- Liu, H., Guo, X., Gooneratne, R., Lai, R., Zeng, C., Zhan, F., & Wang, W. (2016). The gut microbiome and degradation enzyme activity of wild freshwater fishes influenced by their trophic levels. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
