Cited by 227Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop Yield

Changes in soil organic carbon in croplands subjected to fertilizer management: a global meta-analysis

Open access
Han, Pengfei, Zhang, Wen, Wang, Guocheng, Sun, Wenjuan, Huang, Yao·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Cropland soil organic carbon (SOC) is undergoing substantial alterations due to both environmental and anthropogenic changes. Although numerous case studies have been conducted, there remains a lack of quantification of the consequences of such environmental and anthropogenic changes on the SOC sequestration across global agricultural systems. Here, we conducted a global meta-analysis of SOC changes under different fertilizer managements, namely unbalanced application of chemical fertilizers (UCF), balanced application of chemical fertilizers (CF), chemical fertilizers with straw application (CFS), and chemical fertilizers with manure application (CFM). We show that topsoil organic carbon (C) increased by 0.9 (0.7–1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI)) g kg−1 (10.0%, relative change, hereafter the same), 1.7 (1.2–2.3) g kg−1 (15.4%), 2.0 (1.9–2.2) g kg−1 (19.5%) and 3.5 (3.2–3.8) g kg−1 (36.2%) under UCF, CF, CFS and CFM, respectively. The C sequestration durations were estimated as 28–73 years under CFS and 26–117 years under CFM but with high variability across climatic regions. At least 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 C input is needed to maintain the SOC in ~85% cases. We highlight a great C sequestration potential of applying CF, and adopting CFS and CFM is highly important for either improving or maintaining current SOC stocks across all agro–ecosystems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep27199

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Lal R. Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Science 304, 1623– 1627 (2004). 15192216
  2. Monfreda C., Ramankutty N. & Foley J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem Cy 22, doi: 10.1029/2007GB002947 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Luo Z., Wang E. & Sun O. J. Soil carbon change and its responses to agricultural practices in Australian agro-ecosystems: a review and synthesis. Geoderma 155, 211– 223 (2010).
  4. Liu C., Lu M., Cui J., Li B. & Fang C. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta‐analysis. Global Change Biol, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12517 (2014). 24395454 · DOI
  5. Maillard É. & Angers D. A. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol 20, 666– 679 (2014). 24132954
  6. Gattinger A.. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109, 18226– 18231 (2012). 23071312 PMC3497757
  7. Wang G., Luo Z., Han P., Chen H. & Xu J. Critical carbon input to maintain current soil organic carbon stocks in global wheat systems. Sci Rep 6, doi: 10.1038/srep19327 (2016). PMC4725856 26759192 · DOI
  8. Gray J. M.. Direct human influence on atmospheric CO2 seasonality from increased cropland productivity. Nature 515, 398– 401 (2014). 25409830
  9. Zeng N.. Agricultural Green Revolution as a driver of increasing atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude. Nature 515, 394– 397 (2014). 25409829
  10. Khan S. A., Mulvaney R. L., Ellsworth T. R. & Boast C. W. The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 36, 1821– 1832 (2007). 17965385
  11. Liu L. & Greaver T. L. A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Lett 13, 819– 828 (2010). 20482580
  12. Qin W., Hu C. & Oenema O. Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 5, doi: 10.1038/srep16210 (2015). PMC4653642 26586114 · DOI
  13. Mystakidis S., Davin E. L., Gruber N. & Seneviratne S. I. Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using observation‐based water and carbon flux estimates. Global Change Biol, doi: 10.1111/gcb.13217 (2016). 26732346 · DOI
  14. Lin D., Xia J. & Wan S. Climate warming and biomass accumulation of terrestrial plants: a meta‐analysis. New Phytol 188, 187– 198 (2010). 20609113
  15. Bemmelen J. M. V. Über die Bestimmung des Wassers, des Humus, des Schwefels, der in den colloïdalen Silikaten gebundenen Kieselsäure, des Mangans usw im Ackerboden. Die Landwirthschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen 37, pp. 279– 290 (1890).
  16. Luo Y., Hui D. & Zhang D. Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology 87, 53– 63 (2006). 16634296
  17. Guo L. B. & Gifford R. M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis [Review]. Global Change Biol 8, 345– 360 (2002).
  18. Chen J.. Stronger warming effects on microbial abundances in colder regions. Sci Rep 5, doi: 10.1038/srep18032 (2015). PMC4674839 26658882 · DOI
  19. Treseder K. K. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett 11, 1111– 1120 (2008). 18673384

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, P., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Sun, W., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Wen
  • Huang, Yao
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-06-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
27199-27199
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409952857
Cited by
227
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41573069, 31370492, 41321064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon, cropland, fertilizer management, carbon sequestration, mineral fertilizers, straw application, manure application, balanced fertilization, topsoil organic carbon, agroecosystems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review