Cited by 79Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsBuilding materials and conservation

Development of near-zero water consumption cement materials via the geopolymerization of tektites and its implication for lunar construction

Open access
Wang, Kai-tuo, Tang, Qing, Cui, Xue-min, He, Yan, Liu, Le-ping·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The environment on the lunar surface poses some difficult challenges to building long-term lunar bases; therefore, scientists and engineers have proposed the creation of habitats using lunar building materials. These materials must meet the following conditions: be resistant to severe lunar temperature cycles, be stable in a vacuum environment, have minimal water requirements, and be sourced from local Moon materials. Therefore, the preparation of lunar building materials that use lunar resources is preferred. Here, we present a potential lunar cement material that was fabricated using tektite powder and a sodium hydroxide activator and is based on geopolymer technology. Geopolymer materials have the following properties: approximately zero water consumption, resistance to high- and low-temperature cycling, vacuum stability and good mechanical properties. Although the tektite powder is not equivalent to lunar soil, we speculate that the alkali activated activity of lunar soil will be higher than that of tektite because of its low Si/Al composition ratio. This assumption is based on the tektite geopolymerization research and associated references. In summary, this study provides a feasible approach for developing lunar cement materials using a possible water recycling system based on geopolymer technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep29659

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Geopolymer concretes can be fabricated for Lunar applications containing up to 90% of Lunar regolith.

    “Research studies show that geopolymer concretes can be fabricated for Lunar applications containing up to 90% of Lunar regolith [348].”

    From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [348]

    The Discussion says lunar regolith could supply 70–80% of the concrete as aggregate and that, if lunar soil can be geopolymerized, more than 90% of the materials could be indigenous lunar materials. It describes lunar concrete fabrication as hypothetical and says the study did not synthesize geopolymers from lunar soil. Thus it does not demonstrate fabrication of concrete containing 90% lunar regolith. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using Wang et al.'s process with a water recycling device, water consumption would be near zero.

    “Using this method, water consumption would be near zero [348].”
  • Geopolymers have good vacuum stability and radiation shielding properties.

    “They also have good vacuum stability [348] as well as radiation shielding properties [119].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ouyang Z. Review of lunar exploration and introduction of Chinese lunar exploration project. Chinese Journal of Nature 27, 253– 258 (2005).
  2. Davidovits J. Geopolymers. Journal of thermal analysis 37, 1633– 1656 (1991).
  3. MacKenzie K. J. & Smith M. E. Multinuclear solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of inorganic materials. Vol. 6 (ed. MacKenzie K. J..) Ch.5, 359– 369 (Elsevier, 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, K.-T., Tang, Q., Cui, X.-M., He, Y., & Liu, L.-P.
Affiliations
Guangxi University (CN)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-07-13
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
29659-29659
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2466286445
Cited by
79
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21566006, 51561135012)
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Building materials and conservation
Keywords
lunar base construction, lunar regolith, sodium hydroxide activator, water reuse, thermal cycling resistance, vacuum stability, Si/Al ratio, alkali activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review