Cited by 99Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsPlanetary Science and Exploration

The mechanical and structural properties of lunar regolith simulant based geopolymer under extreme temperature environment on the moon through experimental and simulation methods

Xiong, Guiyan, Guo, Xiaolu, Yuan, Shuting, Xia, Ming, Wang, Zhihao·2022·Construction and Building Materials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126679

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strength increase in geopolymers exposed to temperature cycles is explained by frozen moisture in pores, with ice contributing to strength at lower temperatures.

    “Xiong et al.’s explanation for the strength increase was that the moisture trapped in the pores was frozen, and since the strength of the ice was greater at lower temperatures, the ice in the pores contributed to the increase in the strength of the geopolymer [18].”
  • Geopolymer exposed to temperature cycles of −190~25 °C gains compressive strength, while samples exposed to 0~−30 °C cycles increase from 60 MPa to 80 MPa.

    “In another study by Xiong et al. (2022), geopolymer exposed to temperature cycles of −190~25 °C was found to have gained compressive strength while the compressive strength of samples exposed to 0~−30 °C cycles increased from 60 MPa to 80 MPa [18].”
  • Fabrication of geopolymer concrete is a low water-consuming process.

    “Fabrication of geopolymer concrete is a low water-consuming process [349]”
  • Geopolymers show superior mechanical properties and heat resistance compared to regular concretes.

    “Moreover, they show superior mechanical properties and heat resistance compared to regular concretes [349,350].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiong, G., Guo, X., Yuan, S., Xia, M., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Xiaolu
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
325
Pages
126679
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211195873
Cited by
99
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering (CAST-BISEE 2019-039)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178241)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0112600)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
lunar regolith simulant, geopolymer, lunar concrete, compressive strength, thermal shock, aluminosilicate structure, microstructure, lunar base construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review