The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced Materials From Fungal Mycelium: Fabrication and Tuning of Physical Properties
Open accessAbstract
In this work is presented a new category of self-growing, fibrous, natural composite materials with controlled physical properties that can be produced in large quantities and over wide areas, based on mycelium, the main body of fungi. Mycelia from two types of edible, medicinal fungi, Ganoderma lucidum and Pleurotus ostreatus, have been carefully cultivated, being fed by two bio-substrates: cellulose and cellulose/potato-dextrose, the second being easier to digest by mycelium due to presence of simple sugars in its composition. After specific growing times the mycelia have been processed in order to cease their growth. Depending on their feeding substrate, the final fibrous structures showed different relative concentrations in polysaccharides, lipids, proteins and chitin. Such differences are reflected as alterations in morphology and mechanical properties. The materials grown on cellulose contained more chitin and showed higher Young’s modulus and lower elongation than those grown on dextrose-containing substrates, indicating that the mycelium materials get stiffer when their feeding substrate is harder to digest. All the developed fibrous materials were hydrophobic with water contact angles higher than 120°. The possibility of tailoring mycelium materials’ properties by properly choosing their nutrient substrates paves the way for their use in various scale applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The quest for sustainable polyesters – insights into the future
Vilela, C., Sousa, A. F., Fonseca, A. C., Serra, A. C., Coelho, J. F. J., Freire, C. S. R., & Silvestre, A. J. D. (2014) · Polym. Chem. · doi:10.1039/c3py01213a · Cited by 527
Rydz, J., Sikorska, W., Kyulavska, M., & Christova, D. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16010564 · Cited by 303
Cited by
A comprehensive framework for the production of mycelium-based lignocellulosic composites
Elsacker, E., Vandelook, S., Van Wylick, A., Ruytinx, J., De Laet, L., & Peeters, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138431 · Cited by 308
Becoming Sustainable, The New Frontier in Soft Robotics
Hartmann, F., Baumgartner, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202004413 · Cited by 281
Physico-mechanical and thermodynamic properties of mycelium-based biocomposites: a review
Girometta, C., Picco, A. M., Baiguera, R. M., Dondi, D., Babbini, S., Cartabia, M., Pellegrini, M., & Savino, E. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11010281 · Cited by 276
Leather-like material biofabrication using fungi
Jones, M., Gandia, A., John, S., & Bismarck, A. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00606-1 · Cited by 259
Huang, S., Dong, Q., Che, S., Li, R., & Tang, K. H. D. (2025) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178911 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Haneef, M., Ceseracciu, L., Canale, C., Bayer, I. S., Heredia-Guerrero, J. A., & Athanassiou, A.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-01-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41292-41292
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580067168
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.