Cited by 155Renal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcarePharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Application of Machine-Learning Models to Predict Tacrolimus Stable Dose in Renal Transplant Recipients

Open access
Tang, Jie, Liu, Rong, Zhang, Yue-Li, Liu, Mou-Ze, Hu, Yong-Fang, Shao, Ming-Jie, Zhu, Li-Jun, Xin, Hua-Wen +6 more·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and considerable variability in clinical use. Our goal was to compare the performance of multiple linear regression (MLR) and eight machine learning techniques in pharmacogenetic algorithm-based prediction of tacrolimus stable dose (TSD) in a large Chinese cohort. A total of 1,045 renal transplant patients were recruited, 80% of which were randomly selected as the "derivation cohort" to develop dose-prediction algorithm, while the remaining 20% constituted the "validation cohort" to test the final selected algorithm. MLR, artificial neural network (ANN), regression tree (RT), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), boosted regression tree (BRT), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), lasso regression (LAR) and Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) were applied and their performances were compared in this work. Among all the machine learning models, RT performed best in both derivation [0.71 (0.67-0.76)] and validation cohorts [0.73 (0.63-0.82)]. In addition, the ideal rate of RT was 4% higher than that of MLR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use machine learning models to predict TSD, which will further facilitate personalized medicine in tacrolimus administration in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep42192

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All three studies comparing logistic regression to machine learning algorithms for predicting stable tacrolimus dose in kidney transplant patients showed a superior predictive ability of machine learning tools over linear regression models, albeit with a relatively small difference.

    “All studies showed a superior predictive ability of machine learning tools over the linear regression models, albeit with a relatively small difference.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, J., Liu, R., Zhang, Y.-L., Liu, M.-Z., Hu, Y.-F., Shao, M.-J., Zhu, L.-J., Xin, H.-W., Feng, G.-W., Shang, W.-J., Meng, X.-G., Zhang, L.-R., Ming, Y.-Z., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Wei
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
42192-42192
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587106090
Cited by
154
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0905000, 2016YFC0905001, No 2016YFC0905000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
tacrolimus, kidney transplant recipients, pharmacogenetics, machine learning, regression trees, multiple linear regression, personalized medicine, immunosuppressive dosing, Chinese patients
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Drug Dosage Calculations, Precision Medicine, Transplant Recipients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review