Cited by 33Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Machine Learning Applications in Solid Organ Transplantation and Related Complications

Open access
Balch, Jeremy A., Delitto, Daniel, Tighe, Patrick J., Zarrinpar, Ali, Efron, Philip A., Rashidi, Parisa, Upchurch, Gilbert R., Bihorac, Azra +1 more·2021·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

The complexity of transplant medicine pushes the boundaries of innate, human reasoning. From networks of immune modulators to dynamic pharmacokinetics to variable postoperative graft survival to equitable allocation of scarce organs, machine learning promises to inform clinical decision making by deciphering prodigious amounts of available data. This paper reviews current research describing how algorithms have the potential to augment clinical practice in solid organ transplantation. We provide a general introduction to different machine learning techniques, describing their strengths, limitations, and barriers to clinical implementation. We summarize emerging evidence that recent advances that allow machine learning algorithms to predict acute post-surgical and long-term outcomes, classify biopsy and radiographic data, augment pharmacologic decision making, and accurately represent the complexity of host immune response. Yet, many of these applications exist in pre-clinical form only, supported primarily by evidence of single-center, retrospective studies. Prospective investigation of these technologies has the potential to unlock the potential of machine learning to augment solid organ transplantation clinical care and health care delivery systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2021.739728

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balch, J. A., Delitto, D., Tighe, P. J., Zarrinpar, A., Efron, P. A., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G. R., Bihorac, A., & Loftus, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Loftus, Tyler J.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2021-09-16
Volume
12
Pages
739728-739728
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201203768
Cited by
33
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, solid organ transplantation, transplant complications, clinical decision-making, outcome prediction, radiographic image classification, pharmacokinetics, host immune response, organ allocation, clinical implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Machine Learning, Decision Support Techniques, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Graft Survival, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Organ Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review