The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elemental carbon-based method for occupational monitoring of particulate diesel exhaust: methodology and exposure issues
Abstract
Diesel exhaust has been classified a probable human carcinogen, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recommended that employers reduce workers' exposures. Because diesel exhaust is a chemically complex mixture containing thousands of compounds, some measure of exposure must be selected. Previously used methods involving gravimetry or analysis of the soluble organic fraction of diesel soot lack adequate sensitivity and selectivity for low-level determination of particulate diesel exhaust; a new analytical approach was therefore needed. In this paper, results of investigation of a thermal-optical technique for the analysis of the carbonaceous fraction of particulate diesel exhaust are discussed. With this technique, speciation of organic and elemental carbon is accomplished through temperature and atmosphere control and by an optical feature that corrects for pyrolytically generated carbon, or "char,' which is formed during the analysis of some materials. The thermal-optical method was selected because the instrument has desirable design features not present in other carbon analysers. Although various carbon types are determined by the method, elemental carbon is the superior marker of diesel particulate matter because elemental carbon constitutes a large fraction of the particulate mass, it can be quantified at low levels and its only significant source in most workplaces is the diesel engine. Exposure-related issues and sampling methods for particulate diesel exhaust also are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Chang, M. C. O., Robinson, N. F., Trimble, D., & Kohl, S. (2007) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.9.1014 · Cited by 854
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., & Fung, K. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034936u · Cited by 652
Summary of Organic and Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., & Chen, L.-W. A. (2005) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2005.06.0006 · Cited by 371
Solid-fuel household cook stoves: Characterization of performance and emissions
Jetter, J. J., & Kariher, P. (2009) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.014 · Cited by 309
Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation
Winiger, P., Andersson, A., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Semiletov, I. P., Dudarev, O. V., Charkin, A., Shakhova, N., Klimont, Z., Heyes, C., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613401114 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Birch, M. E., & Cary, R. A.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1183
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2170235526
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elemental carbon-based method for occupational monitoring of particulate diesel exhaust: methodology and exposure issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/an9962101183
- The paper
- Birch, M. E., & Cary, R. A. (1996). Elemental carbon-based method for occupational monitoring of particulate diesel exhaust: methodology and exposure issues. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9962101183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.