Cited by 126Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Siberian Arctic black carbon sources constrained by model and observation

Open access
Winiger, Patrik, Andersson, August, Eckhardt, Sabine, Stohl, Andreas, Semiletov, Igor P., Dudarev, Oleg V., Charkin, Alexander, Shakhova, Natalia +3 more·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: A successful mitigation strategy for climate warming agents such as black carbon (BC) requires reliable source information from bottom-up emission inventory data, which can only be verified by observation. We measured BC in one of the fastest-warming and, at the same time, substantially understudied regions on our planet, the northeastern Siberian Arctic. Our observations, compared with an atmospheric transport model, imply that quantification and spatial allocation of emissions at high latitudes, specifically in the Russian Arctic, need improvement by reallocating emissions and significantly shifting source contributions for the transport, domestic, power plant, and gas flaring sectors. This strong shift in reported emissions has potentially considerable implications for climate modeling and BC mitigation efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1613401114

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very few studies have tried to quantify the contribution of local power generation to pollution levels at the surface during winter in Arctic urban environments.

    “However, very few studies have tried to quantify the contribution of local power generation to pollution levels at the surface during winter in Arctic urban environments.8,12”

    From Estimating Power Plant Contributions to Surface Pollution in a Wintertime Arctic Environment (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The paper describes the Siberian Arctic as understudied and estimates that power plants contribute 9% of black carbon at a receptor near Tiksi (opening summary; Methods). It does not establish that very few studies have quantified *local* power generation’s contribution to surface pollution specifically during winter in Arctic urban environments. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analysis of BC data, including new measurements of carbon isotopes in BC, collected at Tiksi on the northern coast of eastern Siberia showed that emissions from transport and domestic heating contribute each more than one third to the atmospheric BC concentrations on average per year.

    “Analysis of BC data, including new measurements of carbon isotopes in BC, collected at Tiksi on the northern coast of eastern Siberia showed that emissions from transport and domestic heating contribute each more than one third to the atmospheric BC concentrations on average per year (Winiger et al., 2017).”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Winiger et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using measured isotope ratios, Winiger et al. (2017) showed that flaring BC emissions in Russia might have been overestimated, while emission distribution and source attribution were found faulty in available emission inventories.

    “Using measured isotope ratios, Winiger et al. (2017) showed that fl aring BC emissions in Russia might have been overestimated, while emission distribution and source attribution were found faulty in available emission inventories.”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Winiger et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Uttal T, Makshats A, Laurila T (2013) The Tiksi International Hydrometeorological Observatory. WMO Bull 62(1):22-26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winiger, P., Andersson, A., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Semiletov, I. P., Dudarev, O. V., Charkin, A., Shakhova, N., Klimont, Z., Heyes, C., & Gustafsson, Ö.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • NILU (NO)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
Corresponding author
Gustafsson, Örjan
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-01-30
Volume
114
Issue
7
Pages
E1054-E1061
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2581686942
Cited by
126
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Energimyndigheten (35450-2)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (PITN-GA-2010-264329, 282688)
  • Nordisk Ministerråd (Defrost)
  • Swedish Research Council Formas (942-2015-1070)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (14.Z50.31.0012/03.19.2014))
  • EC | European Research Council (695331)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
black carbon, Arctic aerosols, Siberian Arctic, Russian Arctic, source attribution, biomass burning, domestic emissions, transport emissions, gas flaring, power plant emissions, open fires, emission inventory, atmospheric dispersion modeling, dual isotope analysis, global warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review