The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microsample preparation by dielectrophoresis: isolation of malaria
Open accessAbstract
An important enabling factor for realising integrated micro fluidic analysis instruments for medical diagnostics purposes is front-end sample preparation. Dielectrophoresis is a method that offers great potential for cell discrimination and isolation for sample processing, and here we have applied it to the problem of isolating malaria-infected cells from blood. During development of the malarial pathogen, Plasmodium falciparum, increases occur in the ionic permeability of the plasma membrane of infected erythrocytes. When challenged by suspension in a low conductivity medium, infected cells lose internal ions while uninfected cells retain them. The resultant dielectric differences between infected and uninfected cells were exploited by dielectrophoretic manipulation in spatially inhomogeneous, travelling electrical fields produced by two types of microelectrode arrays. Parasitised cells of ring form or later stage from cultures and clinical specimens were isolated by steric dielectric field-flow-fractionation, focused at the centre of a spiral electrode array, and identified and counted. The dielectrophoretic methods require only a few micro litres of blood, and should be applicable to the production of small, low-cost automated devices for assessing parasite concentrations with potential applicability to drug sensitivity studies and the diagnosis of malaria. By simple adjustment of the electrical field parameters, other cell subpopulations that characterise disease, such as residual cancer cells in blood, can be similarly isolated and analysed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jarra, W., & Snounou, G. (1998) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.66.8.3783-3787.1998 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images
Chiou, P. Y., Ohta, A. T., & Wu, M. C. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03831 · Cited by 1,444
Microfluidics for cell separation
Bhagat, A. A. S., Bow, H., Hou, H. W., Tan, S. J., Han, J., & Lim, C. T. (2010) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-010-0611-4 · Cited by 632
Toner, M., & Irimia, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108 · Cited by 623
Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare
Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., & Kramer, M. F. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.4.583-607.2005 · Cited by 417
Gupta, V., Jafferji, I., Garza, M., Melnikova, V. O., Hasegawa, D. K., Pethig, R., & Davis, D. W. (2012) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4731647 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Gascoyne, P., Mahidol, C., Ruchirawat, M., Satayavivad, J., Watcharasit, P., & Becker, F. F.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 70
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2125231985
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microsample preparation by dielectrophoresis: isolation of malaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b110990c
- The paper
- Gascoyne, P., Mahidol, C., Ruchirawat, M., Satayavivad, J., Watcharasit, P., & Becker, F. F. (2002). Microsample preparation by dielectrophoresis: isolation of malaria. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110990c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.