Cited by 71Malaria Research and ControlBird parasitology and diseasesMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Only Viable Parasites Are Detected by PCR following Clearance of Rodent Malarial Infections by Drug Treatment or Immune Responses

Open access
Jarra, William, Snounou, Georges·1998·Infection and Immunity

Abstract

Detection and analysis of pathogens by PCR plays an important role in infectious disease research. The value of these studies would be diminished if nuclear material from dead parasites were found to remain in circulation for extended periods and thus result in positive amplification. This possibility was tested in experimental rodent malaria infections. Blood samples were obtained from infected mice during and following drug or immune clearance of Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi parasitemias. Detection of parasite DNA by a sensitive Plasmodium-specific PCR amplification assay was associated with the presence of viable parasites, as detected by subinoculation. No parasite DNA could be detected by PCR 48 h after the injection of killed parasites into mice. Nuclear material from parasites removed by drug or immune responses is rapidly cleared from the circulation and does not contribute significantly to amplification. Thus, results from PCR analysis of malaria-infected blood accurately reflect the presence of live parasites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/iai.66.8.3783-3787.1998

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarra, W., & Snounou, G.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Medical Research (TZ)
  • Northwick Park Hospital (GB)
Venue
Infection and Immunity
Published
1998-08
Volume
66
Issue
8
Pages
3783-3787
ISSN
  • 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5522
OpenAlex
W2144048008
Cited by
71
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
rodent malaria, Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi, parasite DNA detection, parasite viability, drug clearance, immune clearance, subinoculation
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Freezing, Malaria, Male, Mice, Inbred CBA, Sensitivity and Specificity, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plasmodium chabaudi, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review