The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device
Abstract
Polymeric particles in custom designed geometries and with tunable chemical anisotropy are expected to enable a variety of new technologies in diverse areas such as photonics, diagnostics and functional materials. We present a simple, high throughput and high resolution microfluidic method to synthesize such polymeric particles. Building off earlier work that we have done on continuous flow lithography (CFL) (D. Dendukuri, D. C. Pregibon, J. Collins, T. A. Hatton, P. S. Doyle, Nat. Mater., 2006, 5, 365-369; ref. 1), we have devised and implemented a new setup that uses compressed air driven flows in preference to syringe pumps to synthesize particles using a technique that we call stop-flow lithography (SFL). A flowing stream of oligomer is stopped before polymerizing an array of particles into it, providing for much improved resolution over particles synthesized in flow. The formed particles are then flushed out at high flow rates before the cycle of stop-polymerize-flow is repeated. The high flow rates enable orders-of-magnitude improvements in particle throughput over CFL. However, the deformation of the PDMS elastomer due to the imposed pressure restricts how quickly the flow can be stopped before each polymerization event. We have developed a simple model that captures the dependence of the time required to stop the flow on geometric parameters such as the height, length and width of the microchannel, as well as on the externally imposed pressure. Further, we show that SFL proves to be superior to CFL even for the synthesis of chemically anisotropic particles with sharp interfaces between distinct sections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing materials for biology and medicine
Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02388 · Cited by 3,198
Cited by
Cambié, D., Bottecchia, C., Straathof, N. J. W., Hessel, V., & Noël, T. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00707 · Cited by 1,502
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Hydrogel microparticles for biomedical applications
Daly, A. C., Riley, L., Segura, T., & Burdick, J. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0148-6 · Cited by 1,249
Bio-inspired, bioengineered and biomimetic drug delivery carriers
Yoo, J.-W., Irvine, D. J., Discher, D. E., & Mitragotri, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3499 · Cited by 1,236
The Synthesis and Assembly of Polymeric Microparticles Using Microfluidics
Dendukuri, D., & Doyle, P. S. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200803386 · Cited by 654
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dendukuri, D., Gu, S. S., Pregibon, D. C., Hatton, T. A., & Doyle, P. S.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 818
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2122763604
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b703457a
- The paper
- Dendukuri, D., Gu, S. S., Pregibon, D. C., Hatton, T. A., & Doyle, P. S. (2007). Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b703457a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.