The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfabrication-based modulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation
Open accessAbstract
Embryonic stem (ES) cells form spontaneous aggregates during differentiation, and cell-cell communication in the aggregates plays an important role in differentiation. The development of a controlled differentiation scheme for ES cells has been hindered by the lack of a reliable method to produce uniform aggregate sizes. Conventional techniques, such as hanging drop and suspension cultures, do not allow precise control over size of ES cell aggregates. To surmount this problem, we microfabricated adhesive stencils to make mouse ES (mES) cell aggregates of specific sizes ranging from 100 microm to 500 microm in diameter. With this technique, we studied the effect of the initial aggregate size on ES cell differentiation. After 20 days of induction of differentiation, we analyzed the stem cell populations using gene and protein expression assays as well as biochemical functions. Notably, we found that germ layer differentiation depends on the initial size of the ES cell aggregate. Among the ES cell aggregate sizes tested, the aggregates with 300 microm diameter showed similar differentiation profiles of three germ layers as embryoid bodies made using the "hanging drop" technique. The smaller (100 microm) aggregates showed the increased expression of ectodermal markers compared to the larger (500 microm) aggregates, while the 500 microm aggregates showed the increased expression of mesodermal and endodermal markers compared to the 100 microm aggregates. These results indicate that the initial size of the aggregate is an important factor for ES cell differentiation, and can affect germ layer selection as well as the extent of differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1883 · Cited by 890
Self-citationSteinberg, M. S., & Takeichi, M. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.1.206 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Recent advances in three‐dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research
Lin, R., & Chang, H. (2008) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.200700228 · Cited by 1,264
Bioprinting for stem cell research
Tasoglu, S., & Demirci, U. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.005 · Cited by 422
Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing
Schiele, N. R., Corr, D. T., Huang, Y., Raof, N. A., Xie, Y., & Chrisey, D. B. (2010) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001 · Cited by 334
Advances and challenges in stem cell culture
McKee, C., & Chaudhry, G. R. (2017) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.07.051 · Cited by 323
A Hollow Sphere Soft Lithography Approach for Long-Term Hanging Drop Methods
Lee, W. G., Ortmann, D., Hancock, M. J., Bae, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0248 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J., Cho, C. H., Parashurama, N., Li, Y., Berthiaume, F., Toner, M., Tilles, A. W., & Yarmush, M. L.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1018
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2038852722
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfabrication-based modulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b704739h
- The paper
- Park, J., Cho, C. H., Parashurama, N., Li, Y., Berthiaume, F., Toner, M., Tilles, A. W., & Yarmush, M. L. (2007). Microfabrication-based modulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b704739h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.