The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing
Open accessAbstract
Fabrication of cellular constructs with spatial control of cell location (+/-5 microm) is essential to the advancement of a wide range of applications including tissue engineering, stem cell and cancer research. Precise cell placement, especially of multiple cell types in co- or multi-cultures and in three dimensions, can enable research possibilities otherwise impossible, such as the cell-by-cell assembly of complex cellular constructs. Laser-based direct writing, a printing technique first utilized in electronics applications, has been adapted to transfer living cells and other biological materials (e.g., enzymes, proteins and bioceramics). Many different cell types have been printed using laser-based direct writing, and this technique offers significant improvements when compared to conventional cell patterning techniques. The predominance of work to date has not been in application of the technique, but rather focused on demonstrating the ability of direct writing to pattern living cells, in a spatially precise manner, while maintaining cellular viability. This paper reviews laser-based additive direct-write techniques for cell printing, and the various cell types successfully laser direct-written that have applications in tissue engineering, stem cell and cancer research are highlighted. A particular focus is paid to process dynamics modeling and process-induced cell injury during laser-based cell direct writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
The Extracellular Matrix: Not Just Pretty Fibrils
Hynes, R. O. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176009 · Cited by 3,527
Anatomic Demarcation of Cells: Genes to Patterns
Chang, H. Y. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1175686 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration
Tang, D., Tare, R. S., Yang, L.-Y., Williams, D. F., Ou, K.-L., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 · Cited by 613
3D printing of functional microrobots
Li, J., & Pumera, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01062f · Cited by 303
Natural Hydrogel-Based Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Fatimi, A., Okoro, O. V., Podstawczyk, D., Siminska-Stanny, J., & Shavandi, A. (2022) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels8030179 · Cited by 276
Stepanovska, J., Supova, M., Hanzalek, K., Broz, A., & Matejka, R. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9091137 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiele, N. R., Corr, D. T., Huang, Y., Raof, N. A., Xie, Y., & Chrisey, D. B.
- Venue
- Biofabrication
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-07-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 032001
- ISSN
- 1758-5082 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5090
- OpenAlex
- W2128423968
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001
- The paper
- Schiele, N. R., Corr, D. T., Huang, Y., Raof, N. A., Xie, Y., & Chrisey, D. B. (2010). Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/032001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.