The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensor arrays for liquid sensing – electronic tongue systems
Abstract
Electronic tongue systems are multisensor devices dedicated to automatic analysis of complicated composition samples and to the recognition of their characteristic properties. Recently, the number of publications covering this topic has significantly increased. Many possible architectures of such devices were proposed: potentiometric, voltammetric, as well as approaches embracing mass- and optical-sensors. For the analysis of sensor array data, various pattern recognition systems were proposed. All of these topics are summarized in this review. Moreover, additional problems are considered: miniaturization of electronic tongues and hybrid systems for liquid sensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Statistical pattern recognition: a review
Jain, A. K., Duin, P. W., & Mao, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.824819 · Cited by 6,767
Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Ripley, B. D. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812651 · Cited by 6,459
Bühlmann, P., Pretsch, E., & Bakker, E. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr970113+ · Cited by 1,859
Statistical Pattern Recognition
(2001) · Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB · doi:10.1201/9781420035636-10 · Cited by 1,740
Analysis of discrimination mechanisms in the mammalian olfactory system using a model nose
Persaud, K., & Dodd, G. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299352a0 · Cited by 1,592
Nelson, G., Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Feng, L., Zhao, G., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature726 · Cited by 1,518
Cross-Reactive Chemical Sensor Arrays
Albert, K. J., Lewis, N. S., Schauer, C. L., Sotzing, G. A., Stitzel, S. E., Vaid, T. P., & Walt, D. R. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr980102w · Cited by 1,284
Image processing with neural networks—a review
Egmont-Petersen, M., de Ridder, D., & Handels, H. (2002) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(01)00178-9 · Cited by 1,186
The cells and logic for mammalian sour taste detection
Huang, A. L., Chen, X., Hoon, M. A., Chandrashekar, J., Guo, W., Tränkner, D., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05084 · Cited by 808
Cited by
Self-assembled monolayers in organic electronics
Casalini, S., Bortolotti, C. A., Leonardi, F., & Biscarini, F. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00509h · Cited by 608
Green analytical chemistry—theory and practice
Tobiszewski, M., Mechlińska, A., & Namieśnik, J. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b926439f · Cited by 441
A practical approach to optical cross-reactive sensor arrays
Anzenbacher, Jr., Lubal, P., Buček, P., Palacios, M. A., & Kozelkova, M. E. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b926220m · Cited by 379
Review: Highlights in recent applications of electronic tongues in food analysis
Escuder-Gilabert, L., & Peris, M. (2010) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.017 · Cited by 302
Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples: An in-depth review
Monostori, P., Wittmann, G., Karg, E., & Túri, S. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.06.016 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciosek, P., & Wróblewski, W.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 963
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2092557227
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensor arrays for liquid sensing – electronic tongue systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b705107g
- The paper
- Ciosek, P., & Wróblewski, W. (2007). Sensor arrays for liquid sensing – electronic tongue systems. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/b705107g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
