The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic devices for culturing primary mammalian neurons at low densities
Abstract
Microfluidic devices have been used to study high-density cultures of many cell types. Because cell-to-cell signaling is local, however, there exists a need to develop culture systems that sustain small numbers of neurons and enable analyses of the microenvironments. Such cultures are hard to maintain in stable form, and it is difficult to prevent cell death when using primary mammalian neurons. We demonstrate that postnatal primary hippocampal neurons from rat can be cultured at low densities within nanoliter-volume microdevices fabricated using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Doing so requires an additional fabrication step, serial extractions/washes of PDMS with several solvents, which removes uncrosslinked oligomers, solvent and residues of the platinum catalyst used to cure the polymer. We found this step improves the biocompatibility of the PDMS devices significantly. Whereas neurons survive for > or = 7 days in open channel microdevices, the ability to culture neurons in closed-channel devices made of untreated, native PDMS is limited to < or = 2 days. When the closed-channel PDMS devices are extracted, biocompatibility improves allowing for reliable neuron cultures at low densities for > or = 7 days. Comparisons made to autoclaved PDMS and native, untreated PDMS reveal that the solvent-treated polymer is superior in sustaining low densities of primary neurons in culture. When neuronal affinity for local substrates is observed directly, we find that axons localize to channel corners and prefer PDMS surfaces to glass in hybrid devices. When perfusing the channels with media by gravity flow, cultured hippocampal neurons survive for > or = 11 days. Extracting PDMS improves biocompatibility of microfluidic devices and thus enables the study of differentiation of identifiable neurons and the characterization of local extracellular signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solvent Compatibility of Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Microfluidic Devices
Lee, J. N., Park, C., & Whitesides, G. M. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0346712 · Cited by 2,643
The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture.
Dotti, C., Sullivan, C., & Banker, G. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-04-01454.1988 · Cited by 1,862
Cited by
Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia
Berthier, E., Young, E. W. K., & Beebe, D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc20982a · Cited by 799
Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture
Regehr, K. J., Domenech, M., Koepsel, J. T., Carver, K. C., Ellison-Zelski, S. J., Murphy, W. L., Schuler, L. A., Alarid, E. T., & Beebe, D. J. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b903043c · Cited by 719
Nanomaterials for Neural Interfaces
Kotov, N. A., Winter, J. O., Clements, I. P., Jan, E., Timko, B. P., Campidelli, S., Pathak, S., Mazzatenta, A., Lieber, C. M., Prato, M., et al. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200801984 · Cited by 504
Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience
Suh, W. H., Suslick, K. S., Stucky, G. D., & Suh, Y.-H. (2009) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.009 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Millet, L. J., Stewart, M. E., Sweedler, J. V., Nuzzo, R. G., & Gillette, M. U.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 987
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W1970622583
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.