Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors for quantifying the ‘heat’ of chilli peppers: the adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of capsaicin

Kachoosangi, Roohollah Torabi, Wildgoose, Gregory G., Compton, Richard G.·2008·The Analyst

Abstract

A sensitive electroanalytical methodology for the determination of capsaicin using adsorptive stripping voltammetry (AdsSV) at a multiwalled carbon nanotube modified basal plane pyrolytic graphite electrode (MWCNT-BPPGE) is presented. This analytical method is then further developed using a multiwalled carbon nanotube screen-printed electrode (MWCNT-SPE) demonstrating the proof-of-concept that this approach can easily be incorporated into a sensing device which is both facile to use and inexpensive to produce. Capsaicin is the chemical responsible for the hot taste of chilli peppers, and measuring the concentration of capsaicin is an indicator of how hot any given chilli pepper, hot sauce and other related foodstuffs are. Standard additions plots for AdsSV of capsaicin at open circuit potential at a MWCNT-BPPGE exhibits two linear ranges, from 0.5 to 15 microM and from 15 to 60 microM. Using the first range of calibration curve, a detection limit of 0.31 microM (based on 3sigma) is obtained. The plot of standard additions of capsaicin determined using the disposable MWCNT-SPE shows a linear range between 0.5 and 35 microM and a detection limit of 0.45 microM. MWCNT-BPPGE and MWCNT-SPE are successfully utilized for the determination of capsaicin in real samples, such as a few commercially available hot pepper sauces, and the determined values are in excellent agreement and correlation with the average Scoville unit values reported in the literature for these sauces. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first electroanalytical method using MWCNT-BPPGE or MWCNT-SPE reported for the determination of capsaicin. This method offers advantages such as precision and objectivity over the well-known but potentially subjective Scoville method (based on organoleptic testing by human tasting panels) and is facile and inexpensive compared to existing HPLC methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b803588a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Kachoosangi, R. T., Wildgoose, G. G., & Compton, R. G.
Venue
The Analyst
Published
2008
Volume
133
Issue
7
Pages
888
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W1968028676
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors for quantifying the ‘heat’ of chilli peppers: the adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of capsaicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b803588a
The paper
Kachoosangi, R. T., Wildgoose, G. G., & Compton, R. G. (2008). Carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors for quantifying the ‘heat’ of chilli peppers: the adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of capsaicin. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/b803588a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.