The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using dean flows and differential migration
Abstract
Microparticle separation and concentration based on size has become indispensable in many biomedical and environmental applications. In this paper we describe a passive microfluidic device with spiral microchannel geometry for complete separation of particles. The design takes advantage of the inertial lift and viscous drag forces acting on particles of various sizes to achieve differential migration, and hence separation, of microparticles. The dominant inertial forces and the Dean rotation force due to the spiral microchannel geometry cause the larger particles to occupy a single equilibrium position near the inner microchannel wall. The smaller particles migrate to the outer half of the channel under the influence of Dean forces resulting in the formation of two distinct particle streams which are collected in two separate outputs. This is the first demonstration that takes advantage of the dual role of Dean forces for focusing larger particles in a single equilibrium position and transposing the smaller particles from the inner half to the outer half of the microchannel cross-section. The 5-loop spiral microchannel 100 microm wide and 50 microm high was used to successfully demonstrate a complete separation of 7.32 microm and 1.9 microm particles at Dean number De = 0.47. Analytical analysis supporting the experiments and models is also presented. The simple planar structure of the separator offers simple fabrication and makes it ideal for integration with on-chip microfluidic systems, such as micro total analysis systems (muTAS) or lab-on-a-chip (LOC) for continuous filtration and separation applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b820557b · Cited by 1,647
Hydrodynamic mechanisms of cell and particle trapping in microfluidics
Karimi, A., Yazdi, S., & Ardekani, A. M. (2013) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4799787 · Cited by 384
Inertial microfluidics for continuous particle filtration and extraction
Bhagat, A. A. S., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S., & Papautsky, I. (2009) · Microfluidics and Nanofluidics · doi:10.1007/s10404-008-0377-2 · Cited by 334
Self-citationAbdulla, A., Liu, W., Gholamipour-Shirazi, A., Sun, J., & Ding, X. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04210 · Cited by 131
An integrated microfluidic chip for one-step isolation of circulating tumor cells
Lee, T. Y., Hyun, K.-A., Kim, S.-I., & Jung, H.-I. (2017) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.163 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhagat, A. A. S., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S., & Papautsky, I.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1906
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2162444401
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using dean flows and differential migration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b807107a
- The paper
- Bhagat, A. A. S., Kuntaegowdanahalli, S. S., & Papautsky, I. (2008). Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using dean flows and differential migration. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b807107a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.