The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneous immunoassays using magnetic beads on a digital microfluidic platform
Open accessAbstract
A digital microfluidic platform for performing heterogeneous sandwich immunoassays based on efficient handling of magnetic beads is presented in this paper. This approach is based on manipulation of discrete droplets of samples and reagents using electrowetting without the need for channels where the droplets are free to move laterally. Droplet-based manipulation of magnetic beads therefore does not suffer from clogging of channels. Immunoassays on a digital microfluidic platform require the following basic operations: bead attraction, bead washing, bead retention, and bead resuspension. Several parameters such as magnetic field strength, pull force, position, and buffer composition were studied for effective bead operations. Dilution-based washing of magnetic beads was demonstrated by immobilizing the magnetic beads using a permanent magnet and splitting the excess supernatant using electrowetting. Almost 100% bead retention was achieved after 7776-fold dilution-based washing of the supernatant. Efficient resuspension of magnetic beads was achieved by transporting a droplet with magnetic beads across five electrodes on the platform and exploiting the flow patterns within the droplet to resuspend the beads. All the magnetic-bead droplet operations were integrated together to generate standard curves for sandwich heterogeneous immunoassays on human insulin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) with a total time to result of 7 min for each assay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liquid-Infused Surfaces: A Review of Theory, Design, and Applications
Villegas, M., Zhang, Y., Abu Jarad, N., Soleymani, L., & Didar, T. F. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04129 · Cited by 459
Kartikasari, A. E. R., Huertas, C. S., Mitchell, A., & Plebanski, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.692142 · Cited by 343
Digital microfluidics: a versatile tool for applications in chemistry, biology and medicine
Jebrail, M. J., Bartsch, M. S., & Patel, K. D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40318h · Cited by 324
Bioanalytical Chemistry of Cytokines–a Review
Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.009 · Cited by 302
High Density DNA Data Storage Library via Dehydration with Digital Microfluidic Retrieval
Newman, S., Stephenson, A. P., Willsey, M., Nguyen, B. H., Takahashi, C. N., Strauss, K., & Ceze, L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09517-y · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Sista, R. S., Eckhardt, A. E., Srinivasan, V., Pollack, M. G., Palanki, S., & Pamula, V. K.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2188
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W1990211442
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneous immunoassays using magnetic beads on a digital microfluidic platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b807855f
- The paper
- Sista, R. S., Eckhardt, A. E., Srinivasan, V., Pollack, M. G., Palanki, S., & Pamula, V. K. (2008). Heterogeneous immunoassays using magnetic beads on a digital microfluidic platform. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b807855f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.