The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clean coal conversion processes – progress and challenges
Abstract
Although the processing of coal is an ancient problem and has been practiced for centuries, the constraints posed on today's coal conversion processes are unprecedented, and utmost innovations are required for finding the solution to the problem.With a strong demand for an affordable energy supply which is compounded by the urgent need for a CO2 emission control, the clean and efficient utilization of coal presents both a challenge and an opportunity to the current global R&D efforts in this area. This paper provides a historical perspective on the utilization of coal as an energy source as well as describing the progress and challenges and the future prospect of clean coal conversion processes. It provides background on the historical utilization of coal as an energy source, along with particular emphasis on the constraints in current coal conversion technologies. It addresses the energy conversion efficiencies for current coal combustion and gasification processes and for the membrane and looping based novel processes which are currently under development at various stages of testing. The control technologies for pollutants including CO2 in flue gas or syngas are also discussed. The coal conversion process efficiencies under a CO2 constrained environment are illustrated based on data and ASPEN Plus® simulations. The challenges for future R&D efforts in novel coal conversion process development are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,542
Cited by
Dean, C. C., Blamey, J., Florin, N. H., Al-Jeboori, M. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.013 · Cited by 375
Calcium looping sorbents for CO2 capture
Erans, M., Manovic, V., & Anthony, E. J. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.074 · Cited by 369
Performance Enhancement of Calcium Oxide Sorbents for Cyclic CO2 Capture—A Review
Liu, W., An, H., Qin, C., Yin, J., Wang, G., Feng, B., & Xu, M. (2012) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef300220x · Cited by 320
Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review on Technology Readiness Level
Hekmatmehr, H., Esmaeili, A., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Abedi, A., Ali Abuswer, M., Nedeljkovic, D., Latifi, M., Farag, S., & Mohaddespour, A. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 · Cited by 189
Guo, L., Jin, H., Ge, Z., Lu, Y., & Cao, C. (2015) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-015-5967-0 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, F., & Fan, L.-S.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2098763698
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clean coal conversion processes – progress and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b809218b
- The paper
- Li, F., & Fan, L.-S. (2008). Clean coal conversion processes – progress and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/b809218b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.