Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-assembly and gelation properties of α-helix versus β-sheet forming peptides

Saiani, A., Mohammed, A., Frielinghaus, H., Collins, R., Hodson, N., Kielty, C. M., Sherratt, M. J., Miller, A. F.·2009·Soft Matter

Abstract

We have investigated the self-assembly and gelation properties of a set of four octa-peptides: AEAEAKAK, AEAKAEAK, FEFEFKFK and FEFKFEFK. The phenylalanine based peptides adopt β-sheet conformations in solution and the alanine based peptides form α-helices. No self-assembly in solution was observed for AEAKAEAK but AEAEAKAK was found to self-assemble forming thick, rigid fibres with a diameter of ∼6 nm. These fibres were composed of two fibrils aggregating side by side to form “pearl-necklace” morphologies. No gelation was observed for AEAEAKAK in the concentration range investigated (0 to 100 mg ml−1). In contrast, both phenylalanine based peptides were found to self-assemble in solution and to form hydrogels at an initial concentration of ∼8 mg ml−1. Similar morphologies were observed for both peptides corresponding to a relatively homogeneous dense network of semi-flexible fibres with a mesh size of ∼15 to 30 nm depending on the concentration. The fibre diameter was found to be ∼4 nm in good agreement with models found in the literature. TEM micrographs clearly showed that these fibres have a helicoidal or twisted structure. Comparison of TEM with AFM data highlighted the influence of substrate chemistry on the macromolecular assembly of small peptides. In contrast small angle neutron scattering (SANS) approaches, which allow for the probing of hydrogel morphology and structure without the need for sample preparation on solid substrates, provide vital data on hydrogel morphology in solution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b811288f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Saiani, A., Mohammed, A., Frielinghaus, H., Collins, R., Hodson, N., Kielty, C. M., Sherratt, M. J., & Miller, A. F.
Venue
Soft Matter
Published
2009
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
193-202
ISSN
  • 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6848
OpenAlex
W2036278706
Cited by
162
References
1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-assembly and gelation properties of α-helix versus β-sheet forming peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b811288f
The paper
Saiani, A., Mohammed, A., Frielinghaus, H., Collins, R., Hodson, N., Kielty, C. M., Sherratt, M. J., & Miller, A. F. (2009). Self-assembly and gelation properties of α-helix versus β-sheet forming peptides. Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/b811288f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.