The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp.
Abstract
Covering: up to June 2009 Pseudomonas is a diverse genus of Gammaproteobacteria with more than 60 species exhibiting varied life styles in a wide range of environments, including soil, water, plant surfaces, and animals. They are well known for their ubiquity in the natural world, capacity to utilize a striking variety of organic compounds as energy sources, resistance to a wide range of medically- and agriculturally-important antimicrobial compounds, and production of a remarkable array of secondary metabolites. Here, we provide an overview of the astonishing metabolic capacity of the Pseudomonads, summarize the knowledge of secondary metabolite biosynthesis in this group of organisms, and highlight the biological significance of these compounds to the diverse life styles exhibited by Pseudomonas spp. A consistent theme throughout this discussion is the central role of genomics in natural product discovery, characterization of metabolic gene clusters and patterns of their inheritance, and illuminaton of new aspects of Pseudomonas biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Islands in Pathogenic and Environmental Microorganisms
Dobrindt, U., Hochhut, B., Hentschel, U., & Hacker, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro884 · Cited by 1,188
Cited by
Raaijmakers, J. M., De Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O., & Ongena, M. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x · Cited by 1,131
Pierson, L. S., & Pierson, E. A. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2509-3 · Cited by 560
Dimkić, I., Janakiev, T., Petrović, M., Degrassi, G., & Fira, D. (2022) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101754 · Cited by 448
Wang, H., Fewer, D. P., Holm, L., Rouhiainen, L., & Sivonen, K. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1401734111 · Cited by 351
Dickson, R. P., Erb-Downward, J. R., Prescott, H. C., Martinez, F. J., Curtis, J. L., Lama, V. N., & Huffnagle, G. B. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01028-14 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, H., & Loper, J. E.
- Venue
- Natural Product Reports
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1408
- ISSN
- 0265-0568 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4752
- OpenAlex
- W2113284511
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b817075b
- The paper
- Gross, H., & Loper, J. E. (2009). Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. Natural Product Reports. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817075b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
