The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving PEM fuel cell catalyst activity and durability using nitrogen-doped carbon supports: observations from model Pt/HOPG systems
Abstract
This study presents clear and compelling experimental evidence for the significant beneficial effects of nitrogen-doping on the activity of Pt/C catalyst systems for the methanol oxidation reaction. This evidence is obtained through the deployment of geometrically well-defined model catalytic systems consisting of tunable assemblies of Pt catalyst nanoparticles deposited onto undoped, Ar-doped, and N-doped highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrates. Both Ar- and N-doping were achieved via ion beam implantation, and Pt was electrodeposited from solutions of H2PtCl6 in aqueous HClO4. Morphology from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and aqueous electrochemical analysis of catalytic activity was utilized to examine the effect of N-doping compared to the undoped and Ar-doped control samples. The results strongly support the theory that doping nitrogen into a graphite support significantly affects both the morphology and the behavior of the overlying Pt nanoparticles. In particular, nitrogen-doping was observed to cause a significant decrease in the average Pt nanoparticle size, an increase in the Pt nanoparticle dispersion, and a significant increase in catalytic activity and durability for methanol oxidation. The model catalytic systems demonstrated here represent a versatile platform to study catalyst-support interactions in electrocatalytically relevant nanoparticle systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shao, Y., Sui, J., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2008) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.047 · Cited by 763
Shukla, A. K., Ravikumar, M. K., Roy, A., Barman, S. R., Sarma, D. D., Aricò, A. S., Antonucci, V., Pino, L., & Giordano, N. (1994) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2054955 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Nitrogen-doped carbon materials
Inagaki, M., Toyoda, M., Soneda, Y., & Morishita, T. (2018) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.024 · Cited by 867
Li, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, E., McLouth, T., Chiu, C.-Y., Huang, X., & Huang, Y. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3031449 · Cited by 490
Xiong, B., Zhou, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Chen, X., O’Hayre, R., & Shao, Z. (2013) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.019 · Cited by 299
Self-citationChen, Y., Wang, J., Liu, H., Banis, M. N., Li, R., Sun, X., Sham, T.-K., Ye, S., & Knights, S. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp108864y · Cited by 241
Perini, L., Durante, C., Favaro, M., Perazzolo, V., Agnoli, S., Schneider, O., Granozzi, G., & Gennaro, A. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am506916y · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., Pasquarelli, R., Holme, T., Berry, J., Ginley, D., & O'Hayre, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 7830
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2103192132
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving PEM fuel cell catalyst activity and durability using nitrogen-doped carbon supports: observations from model Pt/HOPG systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b910924b
- The paper
- Zhou, Y., Pasquarelli, R., Holme, T., Berry, J., Ginley, D., & O'Hayre, R. (2009). Improving PEM fuel cell catalyst activity and durability using nitrogen-doped carbon supports: observations from model Pt/HOPG systems. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/b910924b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.