Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anion recognition in water

Kubik, Stefan·2010·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Anion recognition by synthetic receptors in water is not a new field, indeed the first receptors that were shown to interact with anionic species exhibited high affinity in aqueous solutions. Anion recognition in aqueous solution was, however, for a long time the domain of receptors containing multiple positive charges and/or metal ions while interactions of neutral receptors with anions were believed to be too weak to be efficient in water. Independent work in several groups has recently shown that this assumption is not necessarily correct. As a consequence, a much wider range of receptors is now available with which anion recognition in competitive aqueous media can be achieved. This tutorial review presents selected examples of synthetic anion receptors active in aqueous solutions and guidelines to achieve anion recognition in water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b926166b

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Kubik, S.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2010
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
3648
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W1981941593
Cited by
531
References
29
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.