Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mesoporous ZSM-22 zeolite obtained by desilication: peculiarities associated with crystal morphology and aluminium distribution

Verboekend, Danny, Chabaneix, André M., Thomas, Karine, Gilson, Jean-Pierre, Pérez-Ramírez, Javier·2011·CrystEngComm

Abstract

Mesoporous ZSM-22 zeolite (TON structure) is prepared by controlled silicon extraction in aqueous NaOH under different conditions of concentration, temperature, and time. The first challenge is to synthesize a pure ZSM-22 sample, since ZSM-5 and cristobalite impurities are hard to avoid. For this purpose, hydrothermal syntheses in autoclaves of 30–1000 cm3 using tumbling or magnetic mixing were conducted. The parent (calcined) and alkaline-treated samples are characterised by XRD, AAS, N2 and Ar adsorption, TEM, 27Al MAS NMR, and FTIR. The introduction of mesoporosity in ZSM-22 crystals is not straightforward due to their peculiar characteristics: the rod-like morphology of their small crystallites, the one-dimensionality of the ellipsoidal micropore system, and an uneven Al distribution. Compared to other zeolite frameworks such as MFI, the generation of up to 95 m2 g−1 of (both inter- and intracrystalline) mesopore surface area by NaOH treatment leads to a sizeable drop of the micropore volume (down to 0.006 cm3 g−1), attributed to blocking by re-deposited Al species. A subsequent mild acid treatment in aqueous HCl restores ca. 90% of the original micropore volume and increases the mesopore surface area to 114 m2 g−1. However, due to the particular Al distribution in the parent ZSM-22 crystals, only 37% of the original Brønsted acidity is recovered. A new descriptor ‘desilication efficiency’ is introduced to relate the mesopore area generated to the mass of zeolite dissolved. In the case of ZSM-22 nanorods and ferrierite platelets, the desilication efficiency is relatively low compared to ZSM-5, most likely due to the crystal morphology of the former two zeolites. The auxiliary mesoporosity developed in ZSM-22 brings new prospects to catalytic applications of the zeolite due to the extensive creation of pore mouths in the hierarchical sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0ce00966k

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Verboekend, D., Chabaneix, A. M., Thomas, K., Gilson, J.-P., & Pérez-Ramírez, J.
Venue
CrystEngComm
Published
2011
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
3408
ISSN
1466-8033 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970732589
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesoporous ZSM-22 zeolite obtained by desilication: peculiarities associated with crystal morphology and aluminium distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0ce00966k
The paper
Verboekend, D., Chabaneix, A. M., Thomas, K., Gilson, J.-P., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2011). Mesoporous ZSM-22 zeolite obtained by desilication: peculiarities associated with crystal morphology and aluminium distribution. CrystEngComm. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ce00966k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.