The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water and ion transport through functionalised carbon nanotubes: implications for desalination technology
Abstract
The use of semipermeable membranes containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) that form continuous pores has been suggested as a way to reduce the cost of desalination viareverse osmosis. Example membranes containing aligned CNTs have been fabricated, but obtaining only the very narrow pores that are able to block the passage of ions while allowing a rapid flow of water remains a challenge and previous computational studies have focused on idealised tubes. Here molecular dynamics simulations are used to examine water and ion transport through functionalised CNTs with the aim of investigating whether such chemical modification allows the performance of CNT based membranes to be improved, or for larger diameter pores to be used. A range of different charged and polar functional groups were added to a 1.1 nm diameter (8,8) CNT that was previously found to be only moderately effective at rejecting ions. These CNTs were incorporated into membranes and simulations were conducted with a hydrostatic pressure difference to determine the ion rejection and flux of water passing through each as well as the energy barriers presented to ions and water molecules. The results show that the addition of charges at the entrance of the pore can help to prevent the passage of ions, however, any functionalisation also reduces the flow of water through the membrane due to increased electrostatic interactions between the water molecules and the CNT. Assuming pore densities that have previously been achieved, the performance of these membranes in the simulations is still many times better than existing technology and thus the inclusion of functionalised CNTs in desalination membranes may prove to be useful in achieving salt rejection and rapid water flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Cited by
Rao, R., Pint, C. L., Islam, A. E., Weatherup, R. S., Hofmann, S., Meshot, E. R., Wu, F., Zhou, C., Dee, N., Amama, P. B., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b06511 · Cited by 588
Critical Knowledge Gaps in Mass Transport through Single-Digit Nanopores: A Review and Perspective
Faucher, S., Aluru, N., Bazant, M. Z., Blankschtein, D., Brozena, A. H., Cumings, J., Pedro de Souza, J., Elimelech, M., Epsztein, R., Fourkas, J. T., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02178 · Cited by 365
Intrapore energy barriers govern ion transport and selectivity of desalination membranes
Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Epsztein, R., Zhan, C., Li, W., Fortner, J. D., Pham, T. A., Kim, J.-H., & Elimelech, M. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd9045 · Cited by 367
Patel, S. K., Ritt, C. L., Deshmukh, A., Wang, Z., Qin, M., Epsztein, R., & Elimelech, M. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee00341g · Cited by 336
Daer, S., Kharraz, J., Giwa, A., & Hasan, S. W. (2015) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.030 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Corry, B.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 751
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2060313935
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.