The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA assembly for synthetic biology: from parts to pathways and beyond
Abstract
The assembly of DNA from small fragments into large constructs has seen significant recent development, becoming a pivotal technology in the ability to implement the vision of synthetic biology. As the cost of whole gene synthesis is decreasing, whole genome synthesis at the other end of the spectrum has expanded our horizons to the prospect of fully engineered synthetic cells. However, the recently proven ability to synthesise genome-scale DNA is at odds with our ability to rationally engineer biological devices, which lags significantly behind. Most work in synthetic biology takes place on an intermediate scale with the combinatorial construction of networks and metabolic pathways from registries of modular biopart components. Implementation for rapid prototyping of engineered biological circuits requires quick and reliable DNA assembly according to specific architectures. It is apparent that DNA assembly is now a limiting technology in advancing synthetic biology. Current techniques employ standardised restriction enzyme assembly protocols such as BioBricks™, BglBricks and Golden Gate methods. Alternatively, sequence-independent overlap techniques, such as In-Fusion™, SLIC and Gibson isothermal assembly are becoming popular for larger assemblies, and in vivo DNA assembly in yeast and bacillus appears adept for chromosome fabrication. It is important to consider how the use of different technologies may impact the outcome of a construction, since the assembly technique can direct the architecture and diversity of systems that can be made. This review provides a critical examination of recent DNA assembly strategies and considers how this important facilitating aspect of synthetic biology may proceed in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast
Ro, D.-K., Paradise, E. M., Ouellet, M., Fisher, K. J., Newman, K. L., Ndungu, J. M., Ho, K. A., Eachus, R. A., Ham, T. S., Kirby, J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04640 · Cited by 2,805
Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution
Wang, H. H., Isaacs, F. J., Carr, P. A., Sun, Z. Z., Xu, G., Forest, C. R., & Church, G. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08187 · Cited by 1,529
The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems
Purnick, P. E. M., & Weiss, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2698 · Cited by 1,181
Next-generation synthetic gene networks
Lu, T. K., Khalil, A. S., & Collins, J. J. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1591 · Cited by 365
Cited by
GoldenBraid: an iterative cloning system for standardized assembly of reusable genetic modules.
Sarrion-Perdigones, A., Falconi, E. E., Zandalinas, S. I., Juárez, P., Fernández-del-Carmen, A., Granell, A., & Orzaez, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021622 · Cited by 348
Bricks and blueprints: methods and standards for DNA assembly.
Casini, A., Storch, M., Baldwin, G. S., & Ellis, T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4014 · Cited by 286
Self-citationePathBrick: A Synthetic Biology Platform for Engineering Metabolic Pathways in E. coli
Xu, P., Vansiri, A., Bhan, N., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2012) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb300016b · Cited by 255
Gene clustering in plant specialized metabolism
Nützmann, H.-W., & Osbourn, A. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.10.009 · Cited by 255
Moses, T., Pollier, J., Thevelein, J. M., & Goossens, A. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12325 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, T., Adie, T., & Baldwin, G. S.
- Venue
- Integrative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-118
- ISSN
- 1757-9694 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-9708
- OpenAlex
- W2113000430
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA assembly for synthetic biology: from parts to pathways and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0ib00070a
- The paper
- Ellis, T., Adie, T., & Baldwin, G. S. (2011). DNA assembly for synthetic biology: from parts to pathways and beyond. Integrative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ib00070a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.