Cited by 220Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Chemical transformation of CO2 during its capture by waste biomass derived biochars

Xu, Xiaoyun, Kan, Yue, Zhao, Ling, Cao, Xinde·2016·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Biochar is a porous carbonaceous material with high alkalinity and rich minerals, making it possible for CO2 capture. In this study, biochars derived from pig manure, sewage sludge, and wheat straw were evaluated for their CO2 sorption behavior. All three biochars showed high sorption abilities for CO2, with the maximum capacities reaching 18.2-34.4 mg g(-1) at 25 °C. Elevating sorption temperature and moisture content promoted the transition of CO2 uptake from physical to chemical process. Mineral components such as Mg, Ca, Fe, K, etc. in biochar induced the chemical sorption of CO2 via the mineralogical reactions which occupied 17.7%-50.9% of the total sorption. FeOOH in sewage sludge biochar was transformed by sorbed CO2 into Fe(OH)2CO3, while the sorbed CO2 in pig manure biochar was precipitated as K2Ca(CO3)2 and CaMg(CO3)2, which resulted in a dominant increase of insoluble inorganic carbon in both biochars. For wheat straw biochar, sorbed CO2 induced CaCO3 transformed into soluble Ca(HCO3)2, which led to a dominant increase of soluble inorganic carbons. The results obtained from this study demonstrated that biochar as a unique carbonaceous material could distinctly be a promising sorbent for CO2 capture in which chemical sorption induced by mineralogical reactions played an important role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.013

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Kan, Y., Zhao, L., & Cao, X.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cao, Xinde
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
213
Pages
533-540
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299492599
Cited by
220
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21537002, 21377081, 21428702)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
CO2 capture, biochar, chemical sorption, sewage sludge biochar, wheat straw biochar, inorganic carbon, calcium carbonate, bicarbonate, iron oxyhydroxide, biomass waste, CO2 sorption capacity
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Animals, Carbon Dioxide, Charcoal, Humidity, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Manure, Minerals, Sewage, Silage, Temperature, Triticum, Sus scrofa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review