Cited by 38Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Evaluation of a tape-stripping technique for measuring dermal exposure to pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene

Kammer, Ronny, Tinnerberg, Håkan, Eriksson, Kåre·2011·Journal of Environmental Monitoring

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have shown an increased incidence of cancer among workers occupationally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As the dermal route is considered important for exposure to PAHs in the workplace, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a tape-stripping technique for monitoring dermal exposure to pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene. The tape-stripping method was evaluated by applying different concentrations of pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene directly onto tape strips (spiked tapes), clean glass plates, and on the skin of five volunteers. The glass plates were stripped using a single strip of tape and the skin of the volunteers was stripped with five consecutive strips of tape after 0 and 30 minutes. The method was also tested on five chimney sweeps at three exposure sites. High-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection was employed for the quantification of pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene. The mean recovery from the spiked tapes was 97% for pyrene and 93% for benzo(a)pyrene. The mean overall recovery from the glass plates was 88% and 76% for pyrene and 88 and 85% for benzo(a)pyrene. The recovery from human skin was 70% and 63% for pyrene and 60 and 54% for benzo(a)pyrene, after 0 and 30 minutes, respectively. A concentration gradient was clearly detected between the five consecutive strips. Detectable amounts of pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene were found on all chimney sweeps at all exposure sites. This method can thus be used to detect and quantify dermal exposure to pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene. The results also show that pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene may be taken up by the skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1em10245a

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination.

    “These studies all indicate that dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination (Fig. 1).”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kammer, R., Tinnerberg, H., & Eriksson, K.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
Corresponding author
Kammer, Ronny
Venue
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
Published
2011
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
2165
ISSN
  • 1464-0325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0333
OpenAlex
W2169880256
Cited by
38
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
tape stripping, dermal exposure, pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, occupational exposure, chimney sweeps, exposure monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Benzo(a)pyrene, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Middle Aged, Pyrenes, Skin, Occupational Exposure, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review