Cited by 491Biofuel production and bioconversionIonic liquids properties and applicationsCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquid–water mixtures

Brandt, Agnieszka, Ray, Michael J., To, Trang Q., Leak, David J., Murphy, Richard J., Welton, Tom·2011·Green Chemistry

Abstract

Ground lignocellulosic biomass (Miscanthus giganteus, pine (Pinus sylvestris) and willow (Salix viminalis)) was pretreated with ionic liquid–water mixtures of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium methyl sulfate and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate. A solid fraction enriched in cellulose was recovered, which was subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis. Up to 90% of the glucose and 25% of the hemicellulose contained in the original biomass were released by the combined ionic liquid pretreatment and the enzymatic hydrolysis. After the pretreatment, the ionic liquid liquor contained the majority of the lignin and the hemicellulose. The lignin portion was partially precipitated from the liquor upon dilution with water. The amount of hemicellulose monomers in the ionic liquid liquor and their conversion into furfurals was also examined. The performance of ionic liquid–water mixtures containing 1,3-dialkylimidazolium ionic liquids with acetate, methanesulfonate, trifluoromethanesulfonate and chloride anions was investigated. The applicability of the ionic liquid 1-butylimidazolium hydrogensulfate for lignocellulose pretreatment was also examined. It was found that ionic liquid liquors containing methyl sulfate, hydrogen sulfate and methanesulfonate anions were most effective in terms of lignin/cellulose fractionation and enhancement of cellulose digestibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1gc15374a

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandt, A., Ray, M. J., To, T. Q., Leak, D. J., Murphy, R. J., & Welton, T.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Welton, Tom
Venue
Green Chemistry
Published
2011
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
2489
ISSN
  • 1463-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9270
OpenAlex
W2144258722
Cited by
491
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
FWCI
16.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Green Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
ionic liquid pretreatment, lignocellulosic biomass, Miscanthus × giganteus, Pinus sylvestris, Salix viminalis, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate, ionic liquid-water mixtures, enzymatic hydrolysis, cellulose digestibility, lignin fractionation, hemicellulose, furfural formation, anion effects, lignocellulose conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review