Cited by 172Biofuel production and bioconversionIonic liquids properties and applicationsLignin and Wood Chemistry

Factors Affecting Wood Dissolution and Regeneration of Ionic Liquids

Li, Bin, Asikkala, Janne, Filpponen, Ilari, Argyropoulos, Dimitris S.·2010·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Three wood species, eucalyptus grandis (E. grandis), southern pine (S. pine), and Norway spruce thermomechanical pulp (N. spruce TMP) were pretreated by dissolution in the ionic liquid (IL) 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([AMIM]Cl). The wood was regenerated from the ionic liquid in high yield and the recycling of the ionic liquid was nearly quantitative. The lignin contents and the efficiencies of cellulase enzymatic hydrolyses of the regenerated wood were examined offering an understanding into the IL pretreatment efficiency. The components that remained within the recycled ILs were qualitatively characterized by 31 P NMR spectroscopy. Wood density, pulverization intensity, and the nature of the regeneration nonsolvents were investigated as factors affecting the overall process. An increase in the wood density decreased the efficiency of the pretreatment, whereas extended pulverization periods decreased the yield of the regenerated wood after the IL pretreatment,with more glucose being released during the enzymatic hydrolysis. The yield of wood after IL pretreatment using water as the regeneration nonsolvent was found to be much higher than that of using methanol. As the reuse cycles of IL increased the wood regeneration yield increased, while certain wood components enriched within the recycled IL. The efficiency of cellulase enzymatic hydrolysis on the regenerated wood decreased with increasing reuse cycles of the IL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie901560p

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Almost quantitative yield of glucose and cellobiose with very little HMF was achieved when hydrolysing pure cellulose in acidified [C4C1im]Cl with the incremental water method.

    “Almost quantitative yield of glucose and cellobiose with very little HMF was achieved when hydrolysing pure cellulose in acidified [C 4 C 1 im]Cl with the incremental water method.149”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [149]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, B., Asikkala, J., Filpponen, I., & Argyropoulos, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Argyropoulos, Dimitris S.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2010-01-29
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
2477-2484
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2045138835
Cited by
172
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
Keywords
ionic liquid pretreatment, wood dissolution, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, thermomechanical pulp, Eucalyptus grandis, southern pine, Norway spruce, lignin removal, ionic liquid recycling, wood density, pulverization, glucose yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review