The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high electrical and mechanical performances
Abstract
Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high mechanical and electrical performances was reported in this study by combining reduced graphene oxide sheets (RGO) and amine-modified nanofibrillated cellulose (A-NFC) in a well-controlled manner. By adjusting the GO content, various graphene/cellulose nanocomposites with 0.1–10 wt% content of graphene were obtained. The RGO/A-NFC nanocomposite synthesized by the developed method exhibits an electrical percolation threshold of 0.3 wt% with an electrical conductivity of 4.79 × 10−4 S m−1, which is well above the antistatic value. Furthermore, with 10 wt% of graphene, a high conductivity of 71.8 S m−1 was measured for the nanocomposite. Moreover, it was found that on addition of only 0.3 wt% of graphene, the tensile strength increased by 1.2 fold and 2.3 folds compared to that of the neat cellulose and graphene oxide paper, respectively, revealing an excellent reinforcement of graphene sheets. Moreover, the elongation at break of the composite with graphene content was 8.5%, which is similar to that of A-NFC paper and much higher than that of GO paper. It is noteworthy to mention that with 5 wt% of graphene, the RGO/A-NFC composite paper showed a significantly enhanced tensile strength of 273 MPa that is 1.4 fold and 2.8 folds higher than that of the cellulose papers and graphene oxide paper, respectively. Such a high enhancement of electrical and mechanical properties in cellulose paper by graphene has never been reported before for any carbon-based material/cellulose composite paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene
Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0731872 · Cited by 13,823
Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L., & Kim, P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04235 · Cited by 13,435
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Cited by
Electrically conductive polymers and composites for biomedical applications
Kaur, G., Adhikari, R., Cass, P., Bown, M., & Gunatillake, P. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra01851j · Cited by 836
Yang, W., Zhao, Z., Wu, K., Huang, R., Liu, T., Jiang, H., Chen, F., & Fu, Q. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c7tc00400a · Cited by 363
Pracella, M., Haque, M. M.-U., & Puglia, D. (2014) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.071 · Cited by 193
Faradilla, R. H. F., Lee, G., Roberts, J., Martens, P., Stenzel, M., & Arcot, J. (2018) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1537-x · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Luong, N. D., Pahimanolis, N., Hippi, U., Korhonen, J. T., Ruokolainen, J., Johansson, L.-S., Nam, J.-D., & Seppälä, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13991
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2036881735
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high electrical and mechanical performances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1jm12134k
- The paper
- Luong, N. D., Pahimanolis, N., Hippi, U., Korhonen, J. T., Ruokolainen, J., Johansson, L.-S., Nam, J.-D., & Seppälä, J. (2011). Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high electrical and mechanical performances. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12134k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.