The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells
Abstract
This paper presents a microfluidic system for cell type classification using mechanical and electrical measurements on single cells. Cells are aspirated continuously through a constriction channel with cell elongations and impedance profiles measured simultaneously. The cell transit time through the constriction channel and the impedance amplitude ratio are quantified as cell's mechanical and electrical property indicators. The microfluidic device and measurement system were used to characterize osteoblasts (n=206) and osteocytes (n=217), revealing that osteoblasts, compared with osteocytes, have a larger cell elongation length (64.51 ± 14.98 μm vs. 39.78 ± 7.16 μm), a longer transit time (1.84 ± 1.48 s vs. 0.94 ± 1.07 s), and a higher impedance amplitude ratio (1.198 ± 0.071 vs. 1.099 ± 0.038). Pattern recognition using the neural network was applied to cell type classification, resulting in classification success rates of 69.8% (transit time alone), 85.3% (impedance amplitude ratio alone), and 93.7% (both transit time and impedance amplitude ratio as input to neural network) for osteoblasts and osteocytes. The system was also applied to test EMT6 (n=747) and EMT6/AR1.0 cells (n=770, EMT6 treated by doxorubicin) that have a comparable size distribution (cell elongation length: 51.47 ± 11.33 μm vs. 50.09 ± 9.70 μm). The effects of cell size on transit time and impedance amplitude ratio were investigated. Cell classification success rates were 51.3% (cell elongation alone), 57.5% (transit time alone), 59.6% (impedance amplitude ratio alone), and 70.2% (both transit time and impedance amplitude ratio). These preliminary results suggest that biomechanical and bioelectrical parameters, when used in combination, could provide a higher cell classification success rate than using electrical or mechanical parameter alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dynamic behavior of chemically “stiffened” red blood cells in microchannel flows
Forsyth, A. M., Wan, J., Ristenpart, W. D., & Stone, H. A. (2010) · Microvascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2010.03.008 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Clusters of circulating tumor cells traverse capillary-sized vessels
Au, S. H., Storey, B. D., Moore, J. C., Tang, Q., Chen, Y.-L., Javaid, S., Sarioglu, A. F., Sullivan, R., Madden, M. W., O’Keefe, R., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524448113 · Cited by 478
The influence of substrate stiffness on the behavior and functions of Schwann cells in culture
Gu, Y., Ji, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Ding, F., Gu, X., & Yang, Y. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.006 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., Zheng, Y., Tan, Q., Shojaei-Baghini, E., Zhang, Y. L., Li, J., Prasad, P., You, L., Wu, X. Y., & Sun, Y.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3174
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2012416957
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1lc20473d
- The paper
- Chen, J., Zheng, Y., Tan, Q., Shojaei-Baghini, E., Zhang, Y. L., Li, J., Prasad, P., You, L., Wu, X. Y., & Sun, Y. (2011). Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20473d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.