The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immobilisation of enzymes on mesoporous silicate materials
Abstract
Mesoporous silicates (MPS) are attractive materials for the immobilisation of enzymes. They possess ordered pore structures, narrow pore size distributions, large surface areas, high stability and can be chemically modified with various functional groups. The properties of MPS materials are reviewed in terms of their ability to act as supports for enzymes for use in biocatalysis with a particular focus on the ability to tailor the surface functionalization of the MPS to suit a specific enzyme. While many reports of the immobilisation of enzymes on MPS have been described, their use as biocatalytic supports is limited. Large scale reactors based on MPS will require continuous flow systems where the properties of the support can be tailored while allowing fluid flow at reasonable low pressure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among many available ways of immobilisation, the most widely preferred ones are adsorption, entrapment or encapsulation and covalent bonding.
“Among many available ways of immobilisation as shown in Figure 2, the most widely preferred ones are adsorption, entrapment or encapsulation and covalent bonding 174 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [174]
There are many extensive reviews on methods and supports used for enzyme immobilisation focusing on a specific support, immobilisation method or enzyme.
“There are many extensive reviews on methods and supports used for enzyme immobilisation 172, 173 focusing on a specific support (e.g. 174 ), immobilisation method (e.g. 175, 176 ) or enzyme (e.g. 177 ).”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [174]
The favouring of adsorption on inorganic matrices is possibly due to extensive research available on those materials and their wide industrial presence, allowing easier industrial implementation of the immobilized biocatalyst.
“This is possibly due to the extensive research available on those materials 174, 200 and their wide industrial presence 201 , thus allowing easier industrial implementation of the immobilized biocatalyst.”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [174]
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates
Wan, Y., & Zhao (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068020s · Cited by 2,371
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Nelson, 1916, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 38, 1109, 10.1021/ja02262a018 · DOI
- Hanefeld, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 453, 10.1039/B711564B · DOI · Paper page
- Schoffelen, 2012, Soft Matter, 8, 1736, 10.1039/C1SM06452E · DOI
- Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
- Lopez-Gallego, 2010, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 14, 174, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.023 · DOI
- Bornscheuer, 2003, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 42, 3336, 10.1002/anie.200301664 · DOI
- Falk, 2012, Biosens. Bioelectron., 37, 38, 10.1016/j.bios.2012.04.030 · DOI
- Krishnan, 2012, Chem. Sci., 3, 1015, 10.1039/c2sc01103d · DOI
- Clark, 1962, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 102, 29, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb13623.x · DOI · Paper page
- Hall, 2011, Chem. Soc. Rev., 111, 4088, 10.1021/cr200013n · DOI
- Barrett, 1951, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 373, 10.1021/ja01145a126 · DOI
- Ravikovitch, 2001, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 6817, 10.1021/jp010621u · DOI
- Weetall, 1976, Methods Enzymol., 44, 776, 10.1016/S0076-6879(76)44056-9 · DOI
- Jin, 2002, Anal. Chim. Acta, 461, 1, 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00229-5 · DOI
- Beck, 1992, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 10834, 10.1021/ja00053a020 · DOI
- Yiu, 2005, J. Mater. Chem., 15, 3690, 10.1039/b506090g · DOI
- Hartmann, 2010, J. Mater. Chem., 20, 844, 10.1039/B907869J · DOI
- Hudson, 2008, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 47, 8582, 10.1002/anie.200705238 · DOI
- Hoffmann, 2006, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 45, 3216, 10.1002/anie.200503075 · DOI
- Zhao, 1998, Science, 279, 548, 10.1126/science.279.5350.548 · DOI
- Gaffney, 2012, Top. Catal., 55, 1101, 10.1007/s11244-012-9899-7 · DOI
- Secundo, 2011, J. Mater. Chem., 21, 15619, 10.1039/c1jm11475a · DOI
- Asefa, 1999, Nature, 402, 867, 10.1038/47229 · DOI
- Hudson, 2005, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 19496, 10.1021/jp052102n · DOI
- Takahashi, 2000, Chem. Mater., 12, 3301, 10.1021/cm000487a · DOI
- Deere, 2004, Langmuir, 20, 532, 10.1021/la035358y · DOI
- Deere, 2003, Biotechnol. Prog., 19, 1238, 10.1021/bp0340537 · DOI
- Qiao, 2008, Chem.–Eur. J., 14, 151, 10.1002/chem.200701102 · DOI
- Jung, 2008, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 113, 523, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.009 · DOI
- Piras, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 7338, 10.1039/c1cc11840d · DOI
- Kadima, 1990, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 3473, 10.1128/AEM.56.11.3473-3477.1990 · DOI
- Hudson, 2007, Chem. Mater., 19, 2049, 10.1021/cm070180c · DOI
- Hochuli, 1987, J. Chromatogr., 411, 177, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)93969-4 · DOI
- Gaffney, 2010, Chem. Commun., 46, 1124, 10.1039/B915169A · DOI
- Jung, 2008, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 113, 523, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.009 · DOI
- Babin, 2007, New J. Chem., 31, 1907, 10.1039/b711544j · DOI
- Szymańska, Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
- Luckarift, 2008, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 31, 1568, 10.1080/10826070802125959 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Magner, E.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6213
- ISSN
- 0306-0012
- 1460-4744
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
