Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy consumption and constant current operation in membrane capacitive deionization

Open access
Zhao, R., Biesheuvel, P. M., van der Wal, A.·2012·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

Membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) is a water desalination technology based on applying a cell voltage between two oppositely placed porous electrodes sandwiching a spacer channel that transports the water to be desalinated. In the salt removal step, ions are adsorbed at the carbon–water interface within the micropores inside the porous electrodes. After the electrodes reach a certain adsorption capacity, the cell voltage is reduced or even reversed, which leads to ion release from the electrodes and a concentrated salt solution in the spacer channel, which is flushed out, after which the cycle can start over again. Ion-exchange membranes are positioned in front of each porous electrode, which has the advantage of preventing the co-ions from leaving the electrode region during ion adsorption, while also allowing for ion desorption at reversed voltage. Both effects significantly increase the salt removal capacity of the system per cycle. The classical operational mode of MCDI at a constant cell voltage results in an effluent stream of desalinated water of which the salt concentration varies with time. In this paper, we propose a different operational mode for MCDI, whereby desalination is driven by a constant electrical current, which leads to a constant salt concentration in the desalinated stream over long periods of time. Furthermore, we show how the salt concentration of the desalinated stream can be accurately adjusted to a certain setpoint, by either varying the electrical current level and/or the water flow rate. Finally, we present an extensive dataset for the energy requirements of MCDI, both for operation at constant voltage and at constant current, and in both cases also for the related technology in which membranes are not included (CDI). We find consistently that in MCDI the energy consumption per mole of salt removed is lower than that in CDI. Within the range 10–200 mM ionic strength of the water to be treated, we find for MCDI a constant energy consumption of ∼22 kT per ion removed. Results in this work are an essential tool to evaluate the economic viability of MCDI for the treatment of saltwater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2ee21737f

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, R., Biesheuvel, P. M., & van der Wal, A.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2012
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
9520
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2014559353
Cited by
521
References
2
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.